i3 Energy Plc
i3 Energy Plc ITE.TO Peers
See (ITE.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITE.TO | $0.23 | +2.22% | 276.56M | 11.50 | $0.02 | +7.35% |
| CNQ.TO | $43.96 | +3.36% | 92.28B | 15.42 | $2.85 | +5.02% |
| TOU.TO | $63.69 | +1.82% | 23.84B | 18.15 | $3.51 | +2.13% |
| ARX.TO | $27.62 | +1.58% | 16.18B | 12.22 | $2.26 | +2.61% |
| OVV.TO | $53.29 | +5.86% | 13.85B | 16.35 | $3.26 | +3.16% |
| CPG.TO | $11.72 | -0.34% | 7.24B | 23.92 | $0.49 | +5.22% |
| ERF.TO | $26.78 | -3.36% | 5.66B | 10.93 | $2.45 | +1.09% |
| SCR.TO | $26.08 | -0.19% | 5.59B | 9.25 | $2.82 | +2.93% |
| PSK.TO | $23.66 | +2.25% | 5.57B | 24.91 | $0.95 | +4.27% |
| MEG.TO | $21.41 | +1.90% | 5.50B | 9.19 | $2.33 | +1.40% |
Stock Comparison
ITE.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 92.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while CNQ.TO trades at $43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 23.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while TOU.TO trades at $63.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 16.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while ARX.TO trades at $27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 13.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while OVV.TO trades at $53.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while CPG.TO trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while ERF.TO trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 5.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while SCR.TO trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PSK.TO trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while MEG.TO trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while WCP.TO trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PEY.TO trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while NVA.TO trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs POU.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while POU.TO trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while ATH.TO trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while IPCO.TO trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while TVE.TO trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while FRU.TO trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while BTE.TO trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while AAV.TO trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -59.83. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while BIR.TO trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while HWX.TO trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs VET.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while VET.TO trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -31.07. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while AOI.TO trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while KEL.TO trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PXT.TO trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs CR.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while CR.TO trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 968.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while CJ.TO trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 841.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while VLE.TO trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 737.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while KEC.TO trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 842.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while BIR-PA.TO trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 568.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while SDE.TO trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PIPE.TO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 540.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while TAL.TO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 496.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while OBE.TO trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 416.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while GFR.TO trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 404.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while TNZ.TO trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -52.39. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 399.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while FEC.TO trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while TGL.TO trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 353.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while SOIL.TO trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 297.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while KEI.TO trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 231.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while GTE.TO trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 226.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while IPO.TO trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 207.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PNE.TO trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 166.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while RBY.TO trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 165.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PRQ.TO trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is -129.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while GXE.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 123.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while BNE.TO trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 109.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while CDR.TO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -23.14. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 108.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while JOY.TO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 103.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while CNE.TO trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 98.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while QEC.TO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PEA.TO trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 92.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while YGR.TO trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while FORZ.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 85.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while TXP.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 49.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PPR.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while PMT.TO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while XOP.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ITE.TO has daily volatility of 2.20 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
ITE.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 7.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while BNG.TO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 6.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while TCF.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while SQX.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while OIL.CN trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while JBR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while BDR.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 917420.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while VIK.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791812.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while WOGC.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520922.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while GTOO.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.
ITE.TO vs EI.CN Comparison
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.56M. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466583.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at $0.23, while EI.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.