i3 Energy Plc
i3 Energy Plc (ITE.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITE.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITE.TO | CA$0.23 | +2.22% | 276.6M | 11.50 | CA$0.02 | +2.01% |
| CNQ.TO | CA$43.86 | -0.58% | 91.8B | 12.32 | CA$3.56 | +6.50% |
| TOU.TO | CA$58.97 | -6.29% | 22.8B | 17.45 | CA$3.38 | +5.10% |
| ARX.TO | CA$27.05 | -2.59% | 15.8B | 11.97 | CA$2.26 | +2.68% |
| OVV.TO | CA$57.09 | -2.38% | 14.7B | 18.30 | CA$3.12 | +2.89% |
| WCP.TO | CA$10.46 | -1.87% | 12.9B | 7.16 | CA$1.46 | +6.86% |
| SCR.TO | CA$34.02 | -2.55% | 7.3B | 10.28 | CA$3.31 | +3.05% |
| CPG.TO | CA$11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | CA$0.49 | +5.03% |
| MEG.TO | CA$27.31 | -0.94% | 6.9B | 11.72 | CA$2.33 | +1.46% |
| ERF.TO | CA$26.78 | -3.36% | 5.7B | 10.93 | CA$2.45 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ITE.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while CNQ.TO trades at CA$43.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check CNQ.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while TOU.TO trades at CA$58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check TOU.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while ARX.TO trades at CA$27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check ARX.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while OVV.TO trades at CA$57.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check OVV.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while WCP.TO trades at CA$10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check WCP.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while SCR.TO trades at CA$34.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check SCR.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while CPG.TO trades at CA$11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check CPG.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while MEG.TO trades at CA$27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check MEG.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while ERF.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check ERF.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PSK.TO trades at CA$23.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PSK.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PEY.TO trades at CA$19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PEY.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs POU.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while POU.TO trades at CA$21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check POU.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while ATH.TO trades at CA$5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check ATH.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while NVA.TO trades at CA$14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check NVA.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while TVE.TO trades at CA$5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check TVE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while IPCO.TO trades at CA$23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check IPCO.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while BTE.TO trades at CA$2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check BTE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while FRU.TO trades at CA$13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check FRU.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while AAV.TO trades at CA$11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -61.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check AAV.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while BIR.TO trades at CA$6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check BIR.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs VET.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while VET.TO trades at CA$11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -54.14. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check VET.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while HWX.TO trades at CA$7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO and HWX.TO have similar daily volatility (2.20).Check HWX.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PXT.TO trades at CA$16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PXT.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while KEL.TO trades at CA$7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check KEL.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while AOI.TO trades at CA$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check AOI.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs CR.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while CR.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check CR.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while CJ.TO trades at CA$7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check CJ.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while KEC.TO trades at CA$22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO and KEC.TO have similar daily volatility (2.20).Check KEC.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 991.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while VLE.TO trades at CA$9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check VLE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 936.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while SDE.TO trades at CA$4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 42.55. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check SDE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 729.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while SGY.TO trades at CA$7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check SGY.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while BIR-PA.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check BIR-PA.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while TAL.TO trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check TAL.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 586.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while OBE.TO trades at CA$8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check OBE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PIPE.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PIPE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 506.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while TNZ.TO trades at CA$18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -40.91. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check TNZ.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 502.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while SOIL.TO trades at CA$2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check SOIL.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 449.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while GFR.TO trades at CA$6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check GFR.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while FEC.TO trades at CA$6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check FEC.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while TGL.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check TGL.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while KEI.TO trades at CA$8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check KEI.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 297.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while IPO.TO trades at CA$10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check IPO.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PNE.TO trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.83. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PNE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while GTE.TO trades at CA$6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check GTE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 199.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while RBY.TO trades at CA$2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check RBY.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 186.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PRQ.TO trades at CA$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 144.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PRQ.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while JOY.TO trades at CA$2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check JOY.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while QEC.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check QEC.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while BNE.TO trades at CA$3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check BNE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while GXE.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check GXE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 114.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while CDR.TO trades at CA$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check CDR.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while YGR.TO trades at CA$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check YGR.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PEA.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PEA.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while FORZ.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check FORZ.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while CNE.TO trades at CA$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check CNE.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while TXP.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check TXP.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PPR.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PPR.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while PMT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check PMT.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while XOP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ITE.TO has daily volatility of 2.20 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check XOP.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while BNG.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check BNG.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while TCF.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check TCF.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while SQX.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check SQX.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while OIL.CN trades at CA$4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check OIL.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while BDR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of -80.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check BDR.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while SHP.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is less volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check SHP.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while VIK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check VIK.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 810.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while JBR.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check JBR.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while WOGC.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check WOGC.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while GTOO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check GTOO.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs EI.CN Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while EI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check EI.CN's competition here
ITE.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while SRX.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check SRX.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while CPI.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check CPI.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while BIR-PC.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check BIR-PC.TO's competition here
ITE.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison August 2025
ITE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITE.TO stands at 276.6M. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITE.TO is priced at CA$0.23, while CNU.TO trades at CA$121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITE.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITE.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITE.TO.Check CNU.TO's competition here