Imperial Brands PLC
Imperial Brands PLC IMBBY Peers
See (IMBBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Tobacco Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMBBY | $39.35 | +0.95% | 32.5B | 9.54 | $4.06 | +5.64% |
| BTAFF | $45.50 | -2.56% | 106.1B | 26.20 | $1.85 | +6.40% |
| JAPAY | $14.62 | -1.08% | 52.9B | 42.60 | $0.35 | +2.96% |
| JAPAF | $29.13 | -6.03% | 51.7B | 42.22 | $0.69 | +4.28% |
| IMBBF | $39.36 | -1.00% | 32.9B | 9.65 | $4.06 | +5.74% |
| SWMAY | $10.57 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 27.82 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SMORF | $1.25 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 41.67 | $0.03 | +0.64% |
| PHJMF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 5.8B | 5.00 | $0.01 | +6.86% |
| PHPMF | $869.36 | -0.64% | 1.7B | 15.43 | $56.35 | +6.47% |
| GGNPF | $0.58 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 29.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IMBBY vs BTAFF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, BTAFF has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while BTAFF trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas BTAFF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BTAFF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to BTAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs JAPAY Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, JAPAY has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while JAPAY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas JAPAY's P/E ratio is 42.60. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to JAPAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to JAPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs JAPAF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, JAPAF has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while JAPAF trades at $29.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas JAPAF's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to JAPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to JAPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs IMBBF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, IMBBF has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while IMBBF trades at $39.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas IMBBF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IMBBF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to IMBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs SWMAY Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, SWMAY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while SWMAY trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas SWMAY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SWMAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to SWMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs SMORF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, SMORF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while SMORF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas SMORF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SMORF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to SMORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs PHJMF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, PHJMF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while PHJMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas PHJMF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PHJMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PHJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs PHPMF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, PHPMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while PHPMF trades at $869.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas PHPMF's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PHPMF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to PHPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs GGNPF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, GGNPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while GGNPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas GGNPF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GGNPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GGNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs GDNGY Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, GDNGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while GDNGY trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas GDNGY's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GDNGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to GDNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs STBGY Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, STBGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while STBGY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas STBGY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to STBGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to STBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs SNDVF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, SNDVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while SNDVF trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas SNDVF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SNDVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to SNDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs KCIGF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, KCIGF has a market cap of 828M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while KCIGF trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas KCIGF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KCIGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to KCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs PYYX Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, PYYX has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while PYYX trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas PYYX's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PYYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PYYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs CHUC Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, CHUC has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while CHUC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas CHUC's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CHUC's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to CHUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs GRAM Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, GRAM has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while GRAM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas GRAM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GRAM's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs GGII Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, GGII has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while GGII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas GGII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GGII's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to GGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs VAPR Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, VAPR has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while VAPR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas VAPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VAPR's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to VAPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs VPRB Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, VPRB has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while VPRB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas VPRB's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VPRB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to VPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs LBRG Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, LBRG has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while LBRG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas LBRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LBRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to LBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs CBDW Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, CBDW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while CBDW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas CBDW's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CBDW's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to CBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs WSRRF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, WSRRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while WSRRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas WSRRF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WSRRF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to WSRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs TOBAF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, TOBAF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while TOBAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas TOBAF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TOBAF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to TOBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs HUMBF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, HUMBF has a market cap of 521.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while HUMBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas HUMBF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HUMBF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to HUMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs MEDH Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, MEDH has a market cap of 89.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while MEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas MEDH's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MEDH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to MEDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs IDLSF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, IDLSF has a market cap of 80.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while IDLSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas IDLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IDLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to IDLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs VPOR Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, VPOR has a market cap of 27.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while VPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas VPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VPOR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to VPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs ASHI Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, ASHI has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while ASHI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas ASHI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ASHI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to ASHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.
IMBBY vs SWMAF Comparison
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 32.5B. In comparison, SWMAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $39.35, while SWMAF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.54, whereas SWMAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SWMAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to SWMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.