Imperial Brands PLC

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, PM has a market cap of 264.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while PM trades at $169.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas PM's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, MO has a market cap of 100.12B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while MO trades at $59.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas MO's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MO's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to MO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, BTI has a market cap of 91.35B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while BTI trades at $41.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas BTI's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BTI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to BTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, BTAFF has a market cap of 90.69B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while BTAFF trades at $41.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas BTAFF's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BTAFF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to BTAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, JAPAY has a market cap of 55.43B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while JAPAY trades at $15.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas JAPAY's P/E ratio is 44.60. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JAPAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to JAPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, JAPAF has a market cap of 51.75B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while JAPAF trades at $29.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas JAPAF's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JAPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to JAPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, IMBBF has a market cap of 33.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while IMBBF trades at $39.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas IMBBF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IMBBF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to IMBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, SWMAY has a market cap of 16.07B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while SWMAY trades at $10.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas SWMAY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SWMAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to SWMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, SMORF has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while SMORF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas SMORF's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SMORF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to SMORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, VGR has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while VGR trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas VGR's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VGR's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to VGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, PHJMF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while PHJMF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas PHJMF's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PHJMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PHJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, RLX has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while RLX trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas RLX's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RLX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to RLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, PHPMF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while PHPMF trades at $795.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas PHPMF's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PHPMF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PHPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, UVV has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while UVV trades at $57.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas UVV's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UVV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to UVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, TPB has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while TPB trades at $74.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas TPB's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TPB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to TPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, STBGY has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while STBGY trades at $7.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas STBGY's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to STBGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to STBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, SNDVF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while SNDVF trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas SNDVF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SNDVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to SNDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, GDNGY has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while GDNGY trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas GDNGY's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GDNGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GDNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, GGNPF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while GGNPF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas GGNPF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GGNPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GGNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, KCIGF has a market cap of 828.00M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while KCIGF trades at $300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas KCIGF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KCIGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to KCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, ISPR has a market cap of 172.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while ISPR trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas ISPR's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ISPR's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to ISPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, PYYX has a market cap of 94.00M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while PYYX trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas PYYX's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PYYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PYYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, CHUC has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while CHUC trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CHUC's P/E ratio is -9.05. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CHUC's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to CHUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, GRAM has a market cap of 10.93M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while GRAM trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas GRAM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GRAM's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, KAVL has a market cap of 6.82M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while KAVL trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas KAVL's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KAVL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to KAVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, GGII has a market cap of 6.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while GGII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas GGII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GGII's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, VAPR has a market cap of 4.34M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while VAPR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas VAPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VAPR's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to VAPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, VPRB has a market cap of 3.33M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while VPRB trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas VPRB's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VPRB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to VPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, XXII has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while XXII trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas XXII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XXII's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to XXII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, WSRRF has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while WSRRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas WSRRF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WSRRF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to WSRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, LBRG has a market cap of 2.08M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while LBRG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas LBRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LBRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to LBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, TOBAF has a market cap of 1.61M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while TOBAF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas TOBAF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TOBAF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to TOBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, CBDW has a market cap of 879110.00. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while CBDW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CBDW's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CBDW's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to CBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, HUMBF has a market cap of 521590.00. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while HUMBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas HUMBF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HUMBF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to HUMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, VPOR has a market cap of 273017.00. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while VPOR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas VPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VPOR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to VPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, IDLSF has a market cap of 80117.00. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while IDLSF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas IDLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IDLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to IDLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, MEDH has a market cap of 67390.00. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while MEDH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas MEDH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MEDH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to MEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, GNLN has a market cap of 60860.00. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while GNLN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas GNLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GNLN's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GNLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, ASHI has a market cap of 9205.00. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while ASHI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas ASHI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ASHI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to ASHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.

IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 33.79B. In comparison, SWMAF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $40.21, while SWMAF trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas SWMAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SWMAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to SWMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.