Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IIPR-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIPR-PA | $22.31 | -0.45% | 1.4B | 4.62 | $4.83 | +14.42% |
| PLD | $131.75 | -0.11% | 122.5B | 37.02 | $3.56 | +3.06% |
| PSA | $297.72 | -0.01% | 52.2B | 33.75 | $8.82 | +4.00% |
| PSA-PK | $18.83 | -0.89% | 47.7B | 1.83 | $10.29 | +4.00% |
| PSA-PH | $22.66 | +0.04% | 46.8B | 2.20 | $10.29 | +4.00% |
| EXR | $141.37 | +0.85% | 29.8B | 30.86 | $4.58 | +4.58% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | +3.29% |
| EGP | $187.61 | -0.44% | 10B | 38.60 | $4.86 | +3.14% |
| CUBE | $38.65 | +1.15% | 8.8B | 26.47 | $1.46 | +5.41% |
| REXR-PB | $21.87 | -0.11% | 8.5B | 24.71 | $0.89 | +4.98% |
Stock Comparison
IIPR-PA vs PLD Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PLD trades at $131.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PLD's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA trades at $297.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PK Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PK trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PK's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PH Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PH trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PH's competition here
IIPR-PA vs EXR Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while EXR trades at $141.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check EXR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LSI Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LSI's competition here
IIPR-PA vs EGP Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while EGP trades at $187.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check EGP's competition here
IIPR-PA vs CUBE Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while CUBE trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check CUBE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs REXR-PB Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while REXR-PB trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check REXR-PB's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LINE Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while LINE trades at $36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -84.72. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LINE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs REXR Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while REXR trades at $34.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check REXR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs FR Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while FR trades at $60.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check FR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs STAG Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while STAG trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check STAG's competition here
IIPR-PA vs TRNO Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while TRNO trades at $62.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check TRNO's competition here
IIPR-PA vs REXR-PC Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while REXR-PC trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check REXR-PC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs RCC Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while RCC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check RCC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PF Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PF's competition here
IIPR-PA vs GRP-UN Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while GRP-UN trades at $59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check GRP-UN's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PG Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PG trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PG's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PI Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PI trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PI's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PJ Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PL Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PL trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PL's competition here
IIPR-PA vs COLD Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while COLD trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check COLD's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PM Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PM trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PM's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PS Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PS trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PS's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PP Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PP trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PP's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PR Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PR trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LXP Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while LXP trades at $46.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LXP's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PQ Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LXP-PC Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while LXP-PC trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.26. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LXP-PC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PO Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PO trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PO's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PN Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PSA-PN trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PN's competition here
IIPR-PA vs NSA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while NSA trades at $30.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check NSA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs NYMTI Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NYMTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while NYMTI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas NYMTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYMTI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check NYMTI's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PMTU Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PMTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IIPR-PA has daily volatility of 1.44 and PMTU has daily volatility of N/A.Check PMTU's competition here
IIPR-PA vs NSA-PA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while NSA-PA trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check NSA-PA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs IIPR Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while IIPR trades at $52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check IIPR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SCCD Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while SCCD trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SCCD's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SCCF Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while SCCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IIPR-PA has daily volatility of 1.44 and SCCF has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCF's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SCCE Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while SCCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IIPR-PA has daily volatility of 1.44 and SCCE has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PLYM Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PLYM trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PLYM's competition here
IIPR-PA vs DHCNI Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 893.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while DHCNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IIPR-PA has daily volatility of 1.44 and DHCNI has daily volatility of N/A.Check DHCNI's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LANDO Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 723.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while LANDO trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -69.44. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LANDO's competition here
IIPR-PA vs NHPAP Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 544M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while NHPAP trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check NHPAP's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LAND Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while LAND trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LAND's competition here
IIPR-PA vs ILPT Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 403.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while ILPT trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check ILPT's competition here
IIPR-PA vs TFSA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while TFSA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IIPR-PA has daily volatility of 1.44 and TFSA has daily volatility of N/A.Check TFSA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs TPTA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 339.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while TPTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IIPR-PA has daily volatility of 1.44 and TPTA has daily volatility of N/A.Check TPTA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LANDM Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while LANDM trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -208.93. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LANDM's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PLYM-PA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs AJXA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check AJXA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SCCB Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SCCB's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SACC Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SACC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LPA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while LPA trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LPA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SELF Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while SELF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SELF's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PW-PA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while PW-PA trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PW-PA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs QTS-PB Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check QTS-PB's competition here
IIPR-PA vs MNR-PC Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check MNR-PC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs QTS-PA Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check QTS-PA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs DRE Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check DRE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs CONE Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check CONE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs QTS Comparison March 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $22.31, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.62, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check QTS's competition here