Solaris Resources Inc.
Solaris Resources Inc. (SLS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLS.TO | CA$13.28 | -4.53% | 2.3B | -38.06 | -CA$0.36 | N/A |
| CGG.TO | CA$28.66 | -1.78% | 11.5B | 18.02 | CA$1.61 | +2.20% |
| GMIN.TO | CA$48.02 | +2.00% | 11.3B | 27.69 | CA$1.71 | N/A |
| TFPM.TO | CA$43.26 | -0.23% | 8.8B | 26.58 | CA$1.61 | +0.73% |
| ARIS.TO | CA$24.20 | -0.33% | 5B | 43.41 | CA$0.56 | N/A |
| PPTA.TO | CA$36.85 | -1.81% | 4.7B | -25.39 | -CA$1.47 | N/A |
| EDR.TO | CA$12.54 | +0.00% | 3.7B | -21.98 | -CA$0.57 | N/A |
| ABRA.TO | CA$16.85 | +4.79% | 2.7B | -44.87 | -CA$0.38 | N/A |
| SIL.TO | CA$15.01 | -8.64% | 2.2B | 18.30 | CA$0.82 | N/A |
| MUX.TO | CA$28.88 | -1.70% | 1.7B | 35.64 | CA$0.81 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLS.TO vs CGG.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CGG.TO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while CGG.TO trades at CA$28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas CGG.TO's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CGG.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to CGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check CGG.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs GMIN.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GMIN.TO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while GMIN.TO trades at CA$48.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas GMIN.TO's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GMIN.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to GMIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check GMIN.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs TFPM.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TFPM.TO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while TFPM.TO trades at CA$43.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas TFPM.TO's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TFPM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to TFPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check TFPM.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs ARIS.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARIS.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ARIS.TO trades at CA$24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ARIS.TO's P/E ratio is 43.41. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ARIS.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ARIS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ARIS.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs PPTA.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PPTA.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while PPTA.TO trades at CA$36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas PPTA.TO's P/E ratio is -25.39. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PPTA.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to PPTA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check PPTA.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs EDR.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EDR.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while EDR.TO trades at CA$12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas EDR.TO's P/E ratio is -21.98. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to EDR.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to EDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check EDR.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs ABRA.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ABRA.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ABRA.TO trades at CA$16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ABRA.TO's P/E ratio is -44.87. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ABRA.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ABRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ABRA.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs SIL.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SIL.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while SIL.TO trades at CA$15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas SIL.TO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SIL.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to SIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check SIL.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs MUX.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MUX.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while MUX.TO trades at CA$28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas MUX.TO's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MUX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to MUX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check MUX.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs ASM.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ASM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ASM.TO trades at CA$8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ASM.TO's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ASM.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ASM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ASM.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs GATO.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GATO.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while GATO.TO trades at CA$21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas GATO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GATO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to GATO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check GATO.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs NUAG.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NUAG.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while NUAG.TO trades at CA$8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas NUAG.TO's P/E ratio is -256.33. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NUAG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to NUAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check NUAG.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs GGD.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GGD.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while GGD.TO trades at CA$2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas GGD.TO's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GGD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to GGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check GGD.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs GSKR.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GSKR.V has a market cap of 721.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while GSKR.V trades at CA$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas GSKR.V's P/E ratio is -10.92. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GSKR.V's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to GSKR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check GSKR.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs VOXR.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VOXR.TO has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while VOXR.TO trades at CA$7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas VOXR.TO's P/E ratio is 51.79. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to VOXR.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to VOXR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check VOXR.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs PTM.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PTM.TO has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while PTM.TO trades at CA$2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas PTM.TO's P/E ratio is -34.29. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PTM.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to PTM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check PTM.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs KCP.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KCP.V has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while KCP.V trades at CA$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas KCP.V's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to KCP.V's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to KCP.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check KCP.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs ALLI.NE Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ALLI.NE has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ALLI.NE trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ALLI.NE's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ALLI.NE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ALLI.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ALLI.NE's competition here
SLS.TO vs SM.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SM.V has a market cap of 274.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while SM.V trades at CA$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas SM.V's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SM.V's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to SM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check SM.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs HSLV.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HSLV.CN has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while HSLV.CN trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas HSLV.CN's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HSLV.CN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to HSLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check HSLV.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs ORV.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ORV.TO has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ORV.TO trades at CA$1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ORV.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ORV.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ORV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ORV.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs WPG.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WPG.V has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while WPG.V trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas WPG.V's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to WPG.V's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to WPG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check WPG.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs XAM.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XAM.TO has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while XAM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas XAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to XAM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to XAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check XAM.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs OCG.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OCG.TO has a market cap of 119M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while OCG.TO trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas OCG.TO's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to OCG.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to OCG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check OCG.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs AGA.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGA.V has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while AGA.V trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas AGA.V's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AGA.V's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to AGA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check AGA.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs ELR.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ELR.TO has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ELR.TO trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ELR.TO's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ELR.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ELR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ELR.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs LUC.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LUC.TO has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while LUC.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas LUC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to LUC.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to LUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check LUC.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs FNM.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FNM.V has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while FNM.V trades at CA$1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas FNM.V's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to FNM.V's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to FNM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check FNM.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs CGNT.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CGNT.V has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while CGNT.V trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas CGNT.V's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CGNT.V's ROE of -3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to CGNT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check CGNT.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs EMPS.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EMPS.CN has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while EMPS.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas EMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to EMPS.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to EMPS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check EMPS.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs DMET.NE Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DMET.NE has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while DMET.NE trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas DMET.NE's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to DMET.NE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to DMET.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check DMET.NE's competition here
SLS.TO vs CUAU.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CUAU.CN has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while CUAU.CN trades at CA$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas CUAU.CN's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CUAU.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to CUAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check CUAU.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs SGO.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SGO.V has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while SGO.V trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas SGO.V's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SGO.V's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to SGO.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check SGO.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs NVRO.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NVRO.CN has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while NVRO.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas NVRO.CN's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NVRO.CN's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to NVRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check NVRO.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs PAU.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PAU.CN has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while PAU.CN trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas PAU.CN's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PAU.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to PAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check PAU.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs ESAU.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ESAU.CN has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ESAU.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ESAU.CN's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ESAU.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ESAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ESAU.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs CLCO.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CLCO.V has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while CLCO.V trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas CLCO.V's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CLCO.V's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to CLCO.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check CLCO.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs ITKO.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ITKO.CN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ITKO.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ITKO.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ITKO.CN's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to ITKO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ITKO.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs AUCU.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AUCU.CN has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while AUCU.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas AUCU.CN's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AUCU.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to AUCU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check AUCU.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs CAM.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CAM.V has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while CAM.V trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas CAM.V's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CAM.V's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to CAM.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check CAM.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs DIAM.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DIAM.TO has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while DIAM.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas DIAM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to DIAM.TO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to DIAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check DIAM.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs CUPR.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CUPR.CN has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while CUPR.CN trades at CA$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas CUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CUPR.CN's ROE of -19.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to CUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check CUPR.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs FTEL.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FTEL.CN has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while FTEL.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas FTEL.CN's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to FTEL.CN's ROE of +4.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to FTEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check FTEL.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs ATHA.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ATHA.CN has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ATHA.CN trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ATHA.CN's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ATHA.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to ATHA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ATHA.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs ELY.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ELY.V has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ELY.V trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ELY.V's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ELY.V's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to ELY.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ELY.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs AUAG.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AUAG.CN has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while AUAG.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas AUAG.CN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AUAG.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to AUAG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check AUAG.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs LECR.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LECR.CN has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while LECR.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas LECR.CN's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to LECR.CN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to LECR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check LECR.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs MPVD.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MPVD.TO has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while MPVD.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas MPVD.TO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MPVD.TO's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to MPVD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check MPVD.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs PNGC.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PNGC.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while PNGC.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas PNGC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PNGC.CN's ROE of +2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to PNGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check PNGC.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs CFE.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CFE.CN has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while CFE.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas CFE.CN's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CFE.CN's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to CFE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check CFE.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs IGLD.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IGLD.CN has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while IGLD.CN trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas IGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to IGLD.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLS.TO has daily volatility of 3.34 and IGLD.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check IGLD.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs SIZE.NE Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SIZE.NE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while SIZE.NE trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas SIZE.NE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SIZE.NE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to SIZE.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check SIZE.NE's competition here
SLS.TO vs TT.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TT.V has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while TT.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas TT.V's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TT.V's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to TT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check TT.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs ACDX.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ACDX.CN has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ACDX.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ACDX.CN's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ACDX.CN's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ACDX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ACDX.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs WDGY.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WDGY.CN has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while WDGY.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas WDGY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to WDGY.CN's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to WDGY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check WDGY.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs GMO.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GMO.TO has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while GMO.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas GMO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GMO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to GMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check GMO.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs HML.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HML.CN has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while HML.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas HML.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HML.CN's ROE of -18.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to HML.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check HML.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs KNOX.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KNOX.V has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while KNOX.V trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas KNOX.V's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to KNOX.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to KNOX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check KNOX.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs PMS.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PMS.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while PMS.CN trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas PMS.CN's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PMS.CN's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to PMS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check PMS.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs MLKM.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MLKM.CN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while MLKM.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas MLKM.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MLKM.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to MLKM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check MLKM.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs COMT.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COMT.CN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while COMT.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas COMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to COMT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to COMT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check COMT.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs AUMN.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AUMN.TO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while AUMN.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas AUMN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AUMN.TO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to AUMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check AUMN.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs ORGN.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ORGN.CN has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while ORGN.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas ORGN.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ORGN.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to ORGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check ORGN.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs WLR.V Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WLR.V has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while WLR.V trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas WLR.V's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to WLR.V's ROE of +28.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to WLR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check WLR.V's competition here
SLS.TO vs NVR.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NVR.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while NVR.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas NVR.CN's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NVR.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to NVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check NVR.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs CRC.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CRC.CN has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while CRC.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas CRC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CRC.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to CRC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check CRC.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs RGN.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RGN.CN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while RGN.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas RGN.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to RGN.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to RGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check RGN.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs GLDS.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GLDS.CN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while GLDS.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas GLDS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GLDS.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to GLDS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check GLDS.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs LTHM.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LTHM.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while LTHM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas LTHM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to LTHM.CN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to LTHM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check LTHM.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs TAI.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TAI.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while TAI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas TAI.CN's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TAI.CN's ROE of -11.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to TAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check TAI.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs SAND.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SAND.CN has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while SAND.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas SAND.CN's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SAND.CN's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to SAND.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check SAND.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs TGLD.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TGLD.CN has a market cap of 943.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while TGLD.CN trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas TGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TGLD.CN's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to TGLD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check TGLD.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs FABL.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FABL.CN has a market cap of 869.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while FABL.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas FABL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to FABL.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to FABL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check FABL.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs TAUR.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TAUR.CN has a market cap of 707.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while TAUR.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas TAUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TAUR.CN's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to TAUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check TAUR.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs AGE.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGE.CN has a market cap of 327.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while AGE.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas AGE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AGE.CN's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to AGE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check AGE.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs MUSK.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MUSK.CN has a market cap of 76.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while MUSK.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas MUSK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MUSK.CN's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to MUSK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check MUSK.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs MMX.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MMX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while MMX.TO trades at CA$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas MMX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MMX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to MMX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check MMX.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs NSR.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NSR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while NSR.TO trades at CA$9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas NSR.TO's P/E ratio is 967.00. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NSR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to NSR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check NSR.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs AXU.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AXU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while AXU.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas AXU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AXU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to AXU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check AXU.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs GCM.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GCM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while GCM.TO trades at CA$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas GCM.TO's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GCM.TO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to GCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check GCM.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs FOXY.CN Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FOXY.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while FOXY.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas FOXY.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to FOXY.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is less volatile compared to FOXY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check FOXY.CN's competition here
SLS.TO vs XGC.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XGC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while XGC.TO trades at CA$30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas XGC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to XGC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to XGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check XGC.TO's competition here
SLS.TO vs PFB.TO Comparison May 2026
SLS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLS.TO stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PFB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLS.TO is priced at CA$13.28, while PFB.TO trades at CA$24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -38.06, whereas PFB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SLS.TO's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PFB.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLS.TO is more volatile compared to PFB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLS.TO.Check PFB.TO's competition here