Idle Lifestyle Inc.
Idle Lifestyle Inc. (IDLSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IDLSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Tobacco Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDLSF | $0.02 | +0.00% | 80.1K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BTAFF | $55.05 | +4.54% | 120.3B | 30.08 | $1.83 | +5.67% |
| JAPAF | $32.04 | +6.80% | 56.9B | 43.89 | $0.73 | +3.89% |
| JAPAY | $15.35 | +3.02% | 54.3B | 41.35 | $0.37 | N/A |
| IMBBF | $39.62 | -0.08% | 33.3B | 9.86 | $4.02 | +5.57% |
| IMBBY | $39.21 | +0.33% | 33B | 9.81 | $4.00 | +5.56% |
| SWMAY | $10.57 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 27.82 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SMORF | $1.25 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 41.67 | $0.03 | +1.07% |
| PHJMF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 5.8B | 5.00 | $0.01 | +6.86% |
| PHPMF | $869.36 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 15.15 | $57.38 | +6.52% |
Stock Comparison
IDLSF vs BTAFF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, BTAFF has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while BTAFF trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTAFF's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTAFF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to BTAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check BTAFF's competition here
IDLSF vs JAPAF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, JAPAF has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while JAPAF trades at $32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAPAF's P/E ratio is 43.89. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to JAPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and JAPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAPAF's competition here
IDLSF vs JAPAY Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, JAPAY has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while JAPAY trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAPAY's P/E ratio is 41.35. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to JAPAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to JAPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check JAPAY's competition here
IDLSF vs IMBBF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, IMBBF has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while IMBBF trades at $39.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMBBF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to IMBBF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to IMBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check IMBBF's competition here
IDLSF vs IMBBY Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, IMBBY has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while IMBBY trades at $39.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMBBY's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to IMBBY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to IMBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check IMBBY's competition here
IDLSF vs SWMAY Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, SWMAY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while SWMAY trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWMAY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SWMAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and SWMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWMAY's competition here
IDLSF vs SMORF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, SMORF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while SMORF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMORF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMORF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to SMORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check SMORF's competition here
IDLSF vs PHJMF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, PHJMF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while PHJMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHJMF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHJMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and PHJMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHJMF's competition here
IDLSF vs PHPMF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, PHPMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while PHPMF trades at $869.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHPMF's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHPMF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to PHPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check PHPMF's competition here
IDLSF vs GGNPF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, GGNPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while GGNPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGNPF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to GGNPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to GGNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check GGNPF's competition here
IDLSF vs STBGY Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, STBGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while STBGY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBGY's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to STBGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and STBGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STBGY's competition here
IDLSF vs GDNGY Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, GDNGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while GDNGY trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDNGY's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to GDNGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and GDNGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDNGY's competition here
IDLSF vs SNDVF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, SNDVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while SNDVF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDVF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNDVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to SNDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check SNDVF's competition here
IDLSF vs KCIGF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, KCIGF has a market cap of 828M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while KCIGF trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCIGF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to KCIGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and KCIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KCIGF's competition here
IDLSF vs PYYX Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, PYYX has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while PYYX trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYYX's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PYYX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and PYYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYYX's competition here
IDLSF vs CHUC Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, CHUC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while CHUC trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHUC's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHUC's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to CHUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check CHUC's competition here
IDLSF vs GRAM Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, GRAM has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while GRAM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to GRAM's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to GRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check GRAM's competition here
IDLSF vs VPRB Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, VPRB has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while VPRB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPRB's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to VPRB's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to VPRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check VPRB's competition here
IDLSF vs VAPR Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, VAPR has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while VAPR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to VAPR's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to VAPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check VAPR's competition here
IDLSF vs GGII Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, GGII has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while GGII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to GGII's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to GGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check GGII's competition here
IDLSF vs LBRG Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, LBRG has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while LBRG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and LBRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBRG's competition here
IDLSF vs WSRRF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, WSRRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while WSRRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRRF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to WSRRF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to WSRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check WSRRF's competition here
IDLSF vs TOBAF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, TOBAF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while TOBAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOBAF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TOBAF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and TOBAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOBAF's competition here
IDLSF vs HUMBF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, HUMBF has a market cap of 521.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while HUMBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUMBF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HUMBF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and HUMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUMBF's competition here
IDLSF vs CBDW Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, CBDW has a market cap of 307.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while CBDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBDW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CBDW's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to CBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check CBDW's competition here
IDLSF vs MEDH Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, MEDH has a market cap of 56.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while MEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MEDH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to MEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check MEDH's competition here
IDLSF vs VPOR Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, VPOR has a market cap of 27.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while VPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to VPOR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and VPOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VPOR's competition here
IDLSF vs ASHI Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, ASHI has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while ASHI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASHI's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASHI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF is less volatile compared to ASHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDLSF.Check ASHI's competition here
IDLSF vs SWMAF Comparison August 2025
IDLSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDLSF stands at 80.1K. In comparison, SWMAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IDLSF is priced at $0.02, while SWMAF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWMAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDLSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SWMAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDLSF and SWMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWMAF's competition here