Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V.
Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. IBA Peers
See (IBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | N/A |
| ADM | $52.78 | +0.00% | 26.2B | 19.17 | $2.84 | +3.71% |
| TSN | $55.94 | +0.00% | 20B | 22.32 | $2.57 | +3.47% |
| BG | $80.28 | +0.00% | 10.8B | 10.30 | $7.79 | +3.40% |
| SFD | $23.53 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 10.67 | $2.27 | +1.04% |
| CALM | $99.63 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 5.03 | $20.24 | +6.62% |
| AGRO | $9.14 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 14.62 | $0.63 | +3.78% |
| VITL | $38.52 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 35.20 | $1.12 | N/A |
| FDP | $32.42 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 10.90 | $3.05 | +3.31% |
| DOLE | $13.99 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 11.57 | $1.23 | +2.28% |
Stock Comparison
IBA vs ADM Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while ADM trades at $52.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs TSN Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while TSN trades at $55.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs BG Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while BG trades at $80.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs SFD Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while SFD trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs CALM Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CALM trades at $99.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AGRO Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AGRO trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs VITL Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while VITL trades at $38.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs FDP Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while FDP trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs DOLE Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while DOLE trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs LND Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 391.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while LND trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs CHSCN Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 340.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCN trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs CHSCP Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 339.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCP trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs CHSCM Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCM trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs CHSCL Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCL trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs CHSCO Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 336.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while CHSCO trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs LMNR Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while LMNR trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -122.77. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs ALCO Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while ALCO trades at $32.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AFRI Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 209.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AFRI trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AGFS Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs VFF Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 128.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while VFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs LOCL Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while LOCL trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs PME Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs DTCK Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while DTCK trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTCK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AFRIW Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AFRIW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -18.26. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs APPHW Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs APPH Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs SDOT Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while SDOT trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs EDBLW Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while EDBLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs EDBL Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while EDBL trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs SANW Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while SANW trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AQB Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AQB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AGRI Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AGRI trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs KALWW Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs KAL Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AAGRW Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 315.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AGRIW Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.
IBA vs AAGR Comparison
IBA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IBA is priced at $53.00, while AAGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IBA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBA is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBA.