Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation HYMCZ Peers
See (HYMCZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYMCZ | $0.04 | -42.62% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NEM | $52.66 | +0.04% | 58.61B | 12.00 | $4.39 | +1.89% |
| AEM | $114.59 | -0.90% | 57.93B | 24.33 | $4.71 | +1.39% |
| WPM | $84.58 | -0.81% | 38.37B | 62.19 | $1.36 | +0.74% |
| GOLD | $18.69 | -0.72% | 32.13B | 15.32 | $1.22 | +2.14% |
| FNV | $164.02 | -1.00% | 31.59B | 51.10 | $3.21 | +0.89% |
| AU | $42.87 | -0.84% | 21.58B | 19.66 | $2.18 | +2.12% |
| GFI | $22.04 | +0.09% | 19.73B | 15.97 | $1.38 | +2.46% |
| KGC | $14.49 | -1.06% | 17.82B | 14.78 | $0.98 | +0.82% |
| RGLD | $176.73 | -1.65% | 11.63B | 29.26 | $6.04 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
HYMCZ vs NEM Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 58.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NEM trades at $52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs AEM Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 57.93B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AEM trades at $114.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs WPM Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while WPM trades at $84.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 62.19. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs GOLD Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 32.13B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GOLD trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs FNV Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 31.59B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while FNV trades at $164.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs AU Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 21.58B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AU trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs GFI Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 19.73B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GFI trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs KGC Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 17.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while KGC trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs RGLD Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.63B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while RGLD trades at $176.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs AGI Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AGI trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs HMY Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HMY trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs AUY Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.63B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs CDE Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CDE trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs OR Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while OR trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 146.18. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs BTG Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while BTG trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs SBSW Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while SBSW trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs EGO Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while EGO trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs IAG Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 3.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while IAG trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs NGD Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NGD trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs ORLA Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while ORLA trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs HL-PB Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HL-PB trades at $51.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1727.33. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs HL Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HL trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 41.79. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs EQX Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while EQX trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs SAND Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while SAND trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 85.20. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs SSRM Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while SSRM trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs NVAWW Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NVAWW trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs CGAU Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CGAU trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs NG Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NG trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs DRD Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while DRD trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs SA Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while SA trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -110.41. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs ARMN Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while ARMN trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 38.28. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs CNL Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 904.44M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CNL trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -22.21. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs GSS Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.33M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs IAUX Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 410.11M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while IAUX trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs GAU Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 349.74M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GAU trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs DC Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 326.72M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while DC trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs CMCL Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 319.91M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CMCL trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs ODV Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 258.19M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while ODV trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs NFGC Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 257.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NFGC trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs CTGO Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 225.02M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CTGO trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs IDR Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 174.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while IDR trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs THM Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 169.51M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while THM trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -40.77. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs GSV Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 155.95M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs VGZ Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 150.42M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while VGZ trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs GLDG Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 149.45M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GLDG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs USAU Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 132.51M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while USAU trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs DC-WT Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 104.40M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while DC-WT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs TRX Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 87.85M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while TRX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -31.14. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs GORO Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 79.81M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GORO trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs HYMC Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 73.70M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HYMC trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs PZG Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 34.01M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while PZG trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs ODVWZ Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 30.42M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while ODVWZ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs AAU Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.10M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs AUST Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 16.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AUST trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs HYMCL Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 477183.00. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.
HYMCZ vs HYMCW Comparison
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at N/A. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 24983.00. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.