Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMCZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HYMCZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYMCZ | $0.04 | -42.62% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NEM | $65.75 | +6.89% | 73.2B | 11.91 | $5.52 | +1.52% |
| AEM | $126.85 | +0.84% | 64.1B | 27.06 | $4.69 | +1.26% |
| WPM | $93.98 | -0.03% | 42.7B | 69.10 | $1.36 | +0.68% |
| GOLD | $21.16 | +1.37% | 36.4B | 16.03 | $1.32 | +1.89% |
| FNV | $162.85 | +0.13% | 31.4B | 50.89 | $3.20 | +0.91% |
| AU | $50.16 | -0.71% | 25.3B | 17.31 | $2.90 | +0.69% |
| GFI | $24.68 | +0.14% | 22.1B | 17.89 | $1.38 | +2.21% |
| KGC | $16.09 | +1.61% | 19.8B | 16.43 | $0.98 | +0.74% |
| AGI | $25.87 | +0.58% | 10.9B | 41.76 | $0.62 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
HYMCZ vs NEM Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NEM trades at $65.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check NEM's competition here
HYMCZ vs AEM Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AEM trades at $126.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check AEM's competition here
HYMCZ vs WPM Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while WPM trades at $93.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 69.10. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check WPM's competition here
HYMCZ vs GOLD Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GOLD trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check GOLD's competition here
HYMCZ vs FNV Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while FNV trades at $162.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check FNV's competition here
HYMCZ vs AU Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AU trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check AU's competition here
HYMCZ vs GFI Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GFI trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check GFI's competition here
HYMCZ vs KGC Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while KGC trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check KGC's competition here
HYMCZ vs AGI Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AGI trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check AGI's competition here
HYMCZ vs RGLD Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while RGLD trades at $154.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check RGLD's competition here
HYMCZ vs HMY Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HMY trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check HMY's competition here
HYMCZ vs SBSW Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while SBSW trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check SBSW's competition here
HYMCZ vs CDE Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CDE trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check CDE's competition here
HYMCZ vs AUY Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check AUY's competition here
HYMCZ vs OR Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while OR trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 164.41. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check OR's competition here
HYMCZ vs EQX Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while EQX trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check EQX's competition here
HYMCZ vs BTG Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while BTG trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check BTG's competition here
HYMCZ vs EGO Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while EGO trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check EGO's competition here
HYMCZ vs IAG Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while IAG trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check IAG's competition here
HYMCZ vs HL-PB Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HL-PB trades at $51.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1715.00. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check HL-PB's competition here
HYMCZ vs HL Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HL trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 51.21. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check HL's competition here
HYMCZ vs NGD Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NGD trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check NGD's competition here
HYMCZ vs ORLA Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while ORLA trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 38.63. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check ORLA's competition here
HYMCZ vs SAND Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while SAND trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 95.55. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check SAND's competition here
HYMCZ vs SSRM Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while SSRM trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check SSRM's competition here
HYMCZ vs NG Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NG trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -20.63. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NG's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check NG's competition here
HYMCZ vs SA Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while SA trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -146.73. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check SA's competition here
HYMCZ vs CGAU Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CGAU trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check CGAU's competition here
HYMCZ vs ARMN Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while ARMN trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 45.97. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check ARMN's competition here
HYMCZ vs DRD Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while DRD trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check DRD's competition here
HYMCZ vs CNL Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 795M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CNL trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check CNL's competition here
HYMCZ vs IAUX Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 504M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while IAUX trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check IAUX's competition here
HYMCZ vs GSS Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check GSS's competition here
HYMCZ vs DC Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 448.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while DC trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check DC's competition here
HYMCZ vs CMCL Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CMCL trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check CMCL's competition here
HYMCZ vs NFGC Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NFGC trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check NFGC's competition here
HYMCZ vs GAU Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 385M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GAU trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -21.36. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check GAU's competition here
HYMCZ vs ODV Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while ODV trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check ODV's competition here
HYMCZ vs IDR Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 279.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while IDR trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check IDR's competition here
HYMCZ vs CTGO Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while CTGO trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check CTGO's competition here
HYMCZ vs THM Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 230.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while THM trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -55.50. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check THM's competition here
HYMCZ vs DC-WT Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 221.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while DC-WT trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check DC-WT's competition here
HYMCZ vs GLDG Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 161M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GLDG trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check GLDG's competition here
HYMCZ vs USAU Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while USAU trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check USAU's competition here
HYMCZ vs GSV Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check GSV's competition here
HYMCZ vs HYMC Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HYMC trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check HYMC's competition here
HYMCZ vs HYMCL Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HYMCL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check HYMCL's competition here
HYMCZ vs VGZ Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 118.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while VGZ trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check VGZ's competition here
HYMCZ vs TRX Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while TRX trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check TRX's competition here
HYMCZ vs NVAWW Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while NVAWW trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check NVAWW's competition here
HYMCZ vs GORO Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GORO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check GORO's competition here
HYMCZ vs PZG Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while PZG trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check PZG's competition here
HYMCZ vs ODVWZ Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while ODVWZ trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check ODVWZ's competition here
HYMCZ vs AAU Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check AAU's competition here
HYMCZ vs AUST Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while AUST trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check AUST's competition here
HYMCZ vs HYMCW Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check HYMCW's competition here
HYMCZ vs PVG Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check PVG's competition here
HYMCZ vs KL Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check KL's competition here
HYMCZ vs GPL Comparison July 2025
HYMCZ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCZ stands at 0. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCZ is priced at $0.04, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, HYMCZ's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCZ is more volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCZ.Check GPL's competition here