Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation HYMCW Peers
See (HYMCW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYMCW | $0.00 | -71.43% | 5K | N/A | -$1.54 | N/A |
| AEM | $117.98 | -3.34% | 59.6B | 24.84 | $4.75 | +1.35% |
| NEM | $52.37 | -3.93% | 58.3B | 11.96 | $4.38 | +1.90% |
| WPM | $88.73 | -3.12% | 40.3B | 64.77 | $1.37 | +0.53% |
| GOLD | $19.85 | -0.90% | 34.1B | 16.27 | $1.22 | +2.02% |
| FNV | $167.22 | -3.06% | 32.2B | 52.09 | $3.21 | +0.87% |
| AU | $45.97 | -2.38% | 23.1B | 21.09 | $2.18 | +0.75% |
| GFI | $24.62 | -3.15% | 22B | 17.84 | $1.38 | +2.20% |
| KGC | $15.10 | -2.36% | 18.5B | 15.40 | $0.98 | +0.79% |
| RGLD | $175.93 | -4.31% | 11.6B | 29.13 | $6.04 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
HYMCW vs AEM Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while AEM trades at $117.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs NEM Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while NEM trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs WPM Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while WPM trades at $88.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 64.77. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs GOLD Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while GOLD trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs FNV Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while FNV trades at $167.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 52.09. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs AU Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while AU trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs GFI Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while GFI trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs KGC Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while KGC trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs RGLD Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while RGLD trades at $175.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs AGI Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while AGI trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs HMY Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while HMY trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs CDE Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while CDE trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs AUY Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs SBSW Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while SBSW trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs OR Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while OR trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 152.41. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs BTG Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while BTG trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs EGO Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while EGO trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs IAG Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while IAG trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs HL Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while HL trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 52.29. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs NGD Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while NGD trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs HL-PB Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while HL-PB trades at $51.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1727.33. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs ORLA Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while ORLA trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs EQX Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while EQX trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs SAND Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while SAND trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 91.85. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs SSRM Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while SSRM trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs NVAWW Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while NVAWW trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs NG Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while NG trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs CGAU Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while CGAU trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs SA Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while SA trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -132.09. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs DRD Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while DRD trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs ARMN Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while ARMN trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs CNL Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 942.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while CNL trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -23.15. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs IAUX Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 476.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while IAUX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs GSS Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs DC Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 417.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while DC trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs GAU Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 373.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while GAU trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs CMCL Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 359.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while CMCL trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs NFGC Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while NFGC trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs ODV Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while ODV trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs CTGO Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 255.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while CTGO trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs THM Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while THM trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -47.75. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs IDR Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while IDR trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs DC-WT Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 188.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while DC-WT trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs USAU Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 179.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while USAU trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs GSV Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs GLDG Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while GLDG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs VGZ Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while VGZ trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs HYMC Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while HYMC trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs TRX Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while TRX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.86. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs GORO Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while GORO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs PZG Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while PZG trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs AUST Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while AUST trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs AAU Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs ODVWZ Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while ODVWZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs HYMCL Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 492.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs GPL Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs HYMCZ Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs PVG Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.
HYMCW vs KL Comparison
HYMCW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMCW stands at 5K. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMCW is priced at $0.00, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HYMCW's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMCW is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMCW.