Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation HYMC Peers
See (HYMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYMC | $3.90 | +12.07% | 136.4M | -1.73 | -$2.10 | N/A |
| NEM | $60.05 | +2.21% | 66.5B | 13.62 | $4.39 | +2.09% |
| AEM | $119.56 | +1.59% | 59.7B | 25.14 | $4.70 | +1.69% |
| WPM | $91.03 | +2.47% | 40.8B | 66.09 | $1.36 | +0.53% |
| GOLD | $21.16 | +1.37% | 36.4B | 16.03 | $1.32 | +2.36% |
| FNV | $159.49 | +0.25% | 30.6B | 49.68 | $3.20 | +1.15% |
| AU | $46.89 | +0.77% | 23.4B | 21.33 | $2.18 | +0.74% |
| GFI | $24.02 | -0.02% | 21.4B | 17.34 | $1.38 | +2.28% |
| KGC | $15.50 | +1.17% | 18.8B | 15.65 | $0.98 | +0.98% |
| AGI | $26.63 | +0.68% | 11B | 42.11 | $0.62 | +0.48% |
Stock Comparison
HYMC vs NEM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while NEM trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AEM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while AEM trades at $119.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs WPM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while WPM trades at $91.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 66.09. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GOLD Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while GOLD trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs FNV Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while FNV trades at $159.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while AU trades at $46.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GFI Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while GFI trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs KGC Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while KGC trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AGI Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while AGI trades at $26.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 42.11. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs RGLD Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while RGLD trades at $160.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HMY Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while HMY trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CDE Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while CDE trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AUY Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs SBSW Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while SBSW trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs OR Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while OR trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 157.71. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs EQX Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while EQX trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs BTG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while BTG trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs EGO Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while EGO trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs IAG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while IAG trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while HL trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 49.13. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NGD Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while NGD trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HL-PB Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while HL-PB trades at $50.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1687.00. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs ORLA Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while ORLA trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs SAND Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while SAND trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 98.25. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs SSRM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while SSRM trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while NG trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -18.15. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NG's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs SA Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while SA trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -140.55. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CGAU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while CGAU trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs ARMN Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while ARMN trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 43.69. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs DRD Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while DRD trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CNL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 853.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while CNL trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -20.96. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs IAUX Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 484.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while IAUX trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs DC Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 463.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while DC trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -13.37. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GSS Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CMCL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 392.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while CMCL trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GAU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while GAU trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -18.93. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs ODV Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 310.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while ODV trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NFGC Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while NFGC trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CTGO Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 250.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while CTGO trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs DC-WT Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 231.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while DC-WT trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs IDR Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 227.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while IDR trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs THM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while THM trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -52.25. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs USAU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while USAU trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GSV Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GLDG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while GLDG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs VGZ Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while VGZ trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GORO Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while GORO trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HYMCL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while HYMCL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs TRX Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while TRX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NVAWW Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while NVAWW trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs PZG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while PZG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs ODVWZ Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while ODVWZ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AAU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AUST Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while AUST trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HYMCW Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs KL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GPL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs PVG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HYMCZ Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $3.90, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.73, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.