Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation HYMC Peers
See (HYMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYMC | $4.34 | +5.34% | 108.4M | -2.07 | -$2.10 | N/A |
| AEM | $117.98 | -3.34% | 59.6B | 24.84 | $4.75 | +1.35% |
| NEM | $52.37 | -3.93% | 58.3B | 11.96 | $4.38 | +1.90% |
| WPM | $88.73 | -3.12% | 40.3B | 64.77 | $1.37 | +0.53% |
| GOLD | $19.85 | -0.90% | 34.1B | 16.27 | $1.22 | +2.02% |
| FNV | $167.22 | -3.06% | 32.2B | 52.09 | $3.21 | +0.87% |
| AU | $45.97 | -2.38% | 23.1B | 21.09 | $2.18 | +0.75% |
| GFI | $24.62 | -3.15% | 22B | 17.84 | $1.38 | +2.20% |
| KGC | $15.10 | -2.36% | 18.5B | 15.40 | $0.98 | +0.79% |
| RGLD | $175.93 | -4.31% | 11.6B | 29.13 | $6.04 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
HYMC vs AEM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while AEM trades at $117.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NEM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while NEM trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs WPM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while WPM trades at $88.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 64.77. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GOLD Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while GOLD trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs FNV Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while FNV trades at $167.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 52.09. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while AU trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GFI Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while GFI trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs KGC Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while KGC trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs RGLD Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while RGLD trades at $175.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AGI Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while AGI trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HMY Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while HMY trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CDE Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while CDE trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AUY Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs SBSW Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while SBSW trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs OR Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while OR trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 152.41. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs BTG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while BTG trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs EGO Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while EGO trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs IAG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while IAG trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while HL trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 52.29. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NGD Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while NGD trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HL-PB Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while HL-PB trades at $51.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1727.33. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs ORLA Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while ORLA trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs EQX Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while EQX trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs SAND Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while SAND trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 91.85. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs SSRM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while SSRM trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NVAWW Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while NVAWW trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while NG trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CGAU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while CGAU trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs SA Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while SA trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -132.09. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs DRD Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while DRD trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs ARMN Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while ARMN trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CNL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 942.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while CNL trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -23.15. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs IAUX Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 476.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while IAUX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GSS Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs DC Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 417.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while DC trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GAU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 373.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while GAU trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CMCL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 359.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while CMCL trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs NFGC Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while NFGC trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs ODV Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while ODV trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs CTGO Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 255.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while CTGO trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs THM Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while THM trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -47.75. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs IDR Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while IDR trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs DC-WT Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 188.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while DC-WT trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs USAU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 179.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while USAU trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GSV Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GLDG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while GLDG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs VGZ Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while VGZ trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs TRX Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while TRX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.86. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GORO Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while GORO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs PZG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while PZG trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AUST Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while AUST trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs AAU Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs ODVWZ Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while ODVWZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HYMCL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 492.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HYMCW Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs KL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs PVG Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs GPL Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is more volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.
HYMC vs HYMCZ Comparison
HYMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYMC stands at 108.4M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYMC is priced at $4.34, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYMC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYMC's ROE is +1.87%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HYMC is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYMC.