Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.
Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HYFM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYFM | $1.19 | -4.03% | 5.6M | -0.08 | -$14.06 | N/A |
| CAT | $693.99 | -0.96% | 324.9B | 36.89 | $18.82 | +0.86% |
| DE | $577.50 | -1.42% | 156B | 32.55 | $17.75 | +1.12% |
| PCAR | $115.34 | -1.27% | 60.7B | 25.57 | $4.51 | +2.35% |
| CNHI | $11.45 | -0.61% | 14.4B | 6.66 | $1.72 | +4.10% |
| CNH | $10.65 | -0.93% | 13.2B | 26.00 | $0.41 | +2.35% |
| OSK | $147.16 | -1.80% | 9.3B | 14.70 | $10.01 | +1.42% |
| AGCO | $118.57 | -1.08% | 8.8B | 12.16 | $9.75 | +0.98% |
| TEX | $59.41 | -1.07% | 3.9B | 17.84 | $3.33 | +1.15% |
| REVG | $63.90 | -1.99% | 3.1B | 33.81 | $1.89 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
HYFM vs CAT Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 324.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while CAT trades at $693.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 36.89. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CAT's competition here
HYFM vs DE Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while DE trades at $577.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check DE's competition here
HYFM vs PCAR Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while PCAR trades at $115.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check PCAR's competition here
HYFM vs CNHI Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CNHI's competition here
HYFM vs CNH Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while CNH trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CNH's competition here
HYFM vs OSK Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while OSK trades at $147.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check OSK's competition here
HYFM vs AGCO Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while AGCO trades at $118.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AGCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check AGCO's competition here
HYFM vs TEX Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while TEX trades at $59.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check TEX's competition here
HYFM vs REVG Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while REVG trades at $63.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check REVG's competition here
HYFM vs ALG Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while ALG trades at $170.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ALG's competition here
HYFM vs LNN Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while LNN trades at $125.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check LNN's competition here
HYFM vs ASTE Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while ASTE trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ASTE's competition here
HYFM vs HY Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while HY trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check HY's competition here
HYFM vs TWI Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 468M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while TWI trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check TWI's competition here
HYFM vs SHYF Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while SHYF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SHYF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check SHYF's competition here
HYFM vs MTW Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 432.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while MTW trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 60.95. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check MTW's competition here
HYFM vs CMCO Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while CMCO trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 69.76. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CMCO's competition here
HYFM vs WNC Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 331.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while WNC trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WNC's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check WNC's competition here
HYFM vs GENC Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 216.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while GENC trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check GENC's competition here
HYFM vs MNTX Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check MNTX's competition here
HYFM vs LEV Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check LEV's competition here
HYFM vs RYM Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, RYM has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while RYM trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RYM's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RYM's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to RYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check RYM's competition here
HYFM vs XOS Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while XOS trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XOS's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check XOS's competition here
HYFM vs NKLA Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check NKLA's competition here
HYFM vs ARTW Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while ARTW trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ARTW's competition here
HYFM vs XOSWW Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while XOSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check XOSWW's competition here
HYFM vs ZEV Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ZEV's competition here
HYFM vs CEAD Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while CEAD trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CEAD's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CEAD's competition here
HYFM vs ZDAI Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ZDAI has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while ZDAI trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZDAI's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZDAI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ZDAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ZDAI's competition here
HYFM vs UGRO Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while UGRO trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UGRO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check UGRO's competition here
HYFM vs IDEX Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check IDEX's competition here
HYFM vs CEADW Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while CEADW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CEADW's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CEADW's competition here
HYFM vs NAV Comparison March 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $1.19, while NAV trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check NAV's competition here