Humacyte, Inc.
Humacyte, Inc. HUMAW Peers
See (HUMAW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUMAW | $0.44 | +7.37% | 353.1M | -0.14 | -$3.16 | N/A |
| VRTX | $457.03 | +1.08% | 117.4B | -119.02 | -$3.84 | N/A |
| REGN | $547.74 | +2.40% | 58.1B | 13.92 | $39.35 | +0.16% |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $329.77 | +2.39% | 43B | -156.28 | -$2.11 | N/A |
| ARGX | $545.11 | +0.49% | 33.3B | 33.26 | $16.39 | N/A |
| BNTX | $108.26 | +0.70% | 26B | -29.57 | -$3.66 | N/A |
| RPRX | $36.19 | +0.86% | 20.3B | 14.77 | $2.45 | +2.40% |
| BGNE | $184.71 | +0.49% | 20.2B | -22.55 | -$8.19 | N/A |
| DNA-WT | $0.27 | -2.76% | 18.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUMAW vs VRTX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 117.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while VRTX trades at $457.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is -119.02. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to VRTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs REGN Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while REGN trades at $547.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs SGEN Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ALNY Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ALNY trades at $329.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is -156.28. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ALNY's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ARGX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ARGX trades at $545.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs BNTX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while BNTX trades at $108.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -29.57. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RPRX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RPRX trades at $36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs BGNE Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to BGNE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs DNA-WT Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs SMMT Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while SMMT trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -66.65. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs UTHR Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while UTHR trades at $295.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs INCY Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while INCY trades at $68.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 340.85. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs GMAB Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while GMAB trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs KRTX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs EXEL Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while EXEL trades at $44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MRNA Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MRNA trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs BMRN Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while BMRN trades at $57.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ASND Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ASND trades at $173.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -25.99. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RXDX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs IMGN Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs TECH Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while TECH trades at $53.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 64.10. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs BPMC Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while BPMC trades at $128.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.29. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CERE Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs BBIO Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while BBIO trades at $42.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ROIVW Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ROIVW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ROIVW trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ROIVW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ROIVW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ROIVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs VRNA Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while VRNA trades at $90.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -45.03. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CORT Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CORT trades at $71.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 62.03. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ROIV Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ROIV trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -14.59. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs IONS Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while IONS trades at $43.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -14.58. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RVMD Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RVMD trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs AMRN Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, AMRN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while AMRN trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AMRN's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to AMRN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to AMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MDGL Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MDGL trades at $300.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -16.85. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs JAZZ Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while JAZZ trades at $109.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs HALO Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while HALO trades at $53.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RETA Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs TGTX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while TGTX trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 145.24. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs TLX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while TLX trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is 182.22. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to TLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ABCM Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ISEE Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs NUVL Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while NUVL trades at $80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs AXSM Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while AXSM trades at $103.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -18.01. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ALKS Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ALKS trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CRSP Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CRSP trades at $51.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ALPN Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs SLNO Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, SLNO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while SLNO trades at $86.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SLNO's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to SLNO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to SLNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ADMA Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ADMA trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs PCVX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while PCVX trades at $33.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RYTM Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RYTM trades at $66.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs OPT Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to OPT's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs AKRO Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while AKRO trades at $51.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MRTX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CYTK Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CYTK trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +8.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs KRYS Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while KRYS trades at $141.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MRUS Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MRUS trades at $53.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -12.82. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ZLAB Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ZLAB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ZLAB trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ZLAB's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ZLAB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ZLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs PTCT Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while PTCT trades at $49.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RYZB Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RARE Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RARE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RARE trades at $39.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RARE's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RARE's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CBAY Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ACLX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ACLX trades at $66.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -22.19. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ACAD Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ACAD trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs SWTX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RNA Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RNA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RNA trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RNA's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs AAPG Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, AAPG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while AAPG trades at $39.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AAPG's P/E ratio is -52.92. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to AAPG's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to AAPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs SRRK Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while SRRK trades at $35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -13.93. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs LEGN Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while LEGN trades at $35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -30.42. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs PTGX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while PTGX trades at $50.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is 64.99. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to PTGX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs VKTX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while VKTX trades at $27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -23.89. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MLTX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MLTX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MLTX trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MLTX's P/E ratio is -20.78. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MLTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MTSR Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MTSR trades at $28.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs KYMR Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while KYMR trades at $44.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -14.32. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs IMVT Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while IMVT trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MORF Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MORF trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MOR Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MOR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MOR's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CRNX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CRNX trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs KDNY Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, KDNY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while KDNY trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas KDNY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to KDNY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to KDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs APGE Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while APGE trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MYOV Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MYOV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MYOV trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MYOV's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MYOV's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MYOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CPRX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CPRX trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs XENE Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while XENE trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs MIRM Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while MIRM trades at $49.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -30.52. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs PRVB Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, PRVB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while PRVB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PRVB's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to PRVB's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to PRVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs LBPH Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, LBPH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while LBPH trades at $59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LBPH's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to LBPH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to LBPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs ARWR Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while ARWR trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs IBRX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while IBRX trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs DICE Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, DICE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while DICE trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DICE's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to DICE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to DICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs APLS Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while APLS trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to APLS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs LGND Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while LGND trades at $113.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is -15.57. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to LGND's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs DNLI Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while DNLI trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs VCYT Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while VCYT trades at $27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 65.67. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CALT Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CALT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CALT trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CALT's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CALT's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CALT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs NAMS Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while NAMS trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs VCEL Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, VCEL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while VCEL trades at $41.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VCEL's P/E ratio is 828.00. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to VCEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to VCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs RXRX Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, RXRX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while RXRX trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RXRX's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to RXRX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to RXRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs AGIO Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, AGIO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while AGIO trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AGIO's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to AGIO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to AGIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs CGON Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while CGON trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs KNSA Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while KNSA trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is -114.37. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to KNSA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs BEAM Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, BEAM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while BEAM trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BEAM's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to BEAM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to BEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.
HUMAW vs IDYA Comparison
HUMAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUMAW stands at 353.1M. In comparison, IDYA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUMAW is priced at $0.44, while IDYA trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUMAW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas IDYA's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, HUMAW's ROE is +2.86%, compared to IDYA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUMAW is more volatile compared to IDYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUMAW.