Hitachi Metals, Ltd.
Hitachi Metals, Ltd. HMTLY Peers
See (HMTLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMTLY | $265.75 | N/A | 11.4B | 31.23 | $8.51 | N/A |
TATLY | $9.25 | N/A | 115.5B | -185.00 | -$0.05 | +9.19% |
AMSYF | $31.00 | N/A | 23.8B | 19.75 | $1.57 | +1.69% |
VLOWY | $3.63 | -1.09% | 21.3B | 8.85 | $0.41 | +9.35% |
NISTF | $19.75 | -1.37% | 20.6B | 8.55 | $2.31 | +0.04% |
NPSCY | $6.53 | -1.29% | 20.5B | 8.47 | $0.77 | +1.84% |
SVJTY | $21.90 | +119.00% | 18.3B | 4.49 | $4.88 | +31.52% |
CISXF | $19.87 | +33.36% | 15.2B | 141.93 | $0.14 | +0.04% |
JFEEF | $11.40 | -12.71% | 7.3B | 12.00 | $0.95 | +0.04% |
BLSFF | $15.07 | N/A | 6.6B | 19.08 | $0.79 | +2.59% |
Stock Comparison
HMTLY vs TATLY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while TATLY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and TATLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs AMSYF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while AMSYF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to AMSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs VLOWY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while VLOWY trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs NISTF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while NISTF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to NISTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and NISTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs NPSCY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while NPSCY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to NPSCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs SVJTY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to SVJTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs CISXF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while CISXF trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 141.93. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to CISXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and CISXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs JFEEF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while JFEEF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to JFEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs BLSFF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BLSFF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while BLSFF trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas BLSFF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to BLSFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to BLSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs BLSFY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while BLSFY trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and BLSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs KUMBF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KUMBF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while KUMBF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas KUMBF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to KUMBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to KUMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs SSAAY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while SSAAY trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and SSAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs SSAAF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SSAAF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while SSAAF trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas SSAAF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to SSAAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to SSAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs KBSTF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while KBSTF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to KBSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs KIROY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while KIROY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and KIROY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs ICHBF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and ICHBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs VLOUF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while VLOUF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to VLOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs VLPNF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while VLPNF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to VLPNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to VLPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs OUTKY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while OUTKY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -41.20. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs MAANF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while MAANF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs YMTKF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to YMTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and YMTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs ANIOY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while ANIOY trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to ANIOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and ANIOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs STZHF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while STZHF trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and STZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs ANGGF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while ANGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and ANGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs APEMY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while APEMY trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and APEMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs APMSF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while APMSF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and APMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs SMSMY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while SMSMY trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -91.73. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and SMSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs EVRZF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and EVRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs MCHIF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while MCHIF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and MCHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs SMUPF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while SMUPF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -78.64. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to SMUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs CIAFF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CIAFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while CIAFF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas CIAFF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to CIAFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to CIAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs CKSNY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while CKSNY trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and CKSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs LIFZF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while LIFZF trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs OUTFF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while OUTFF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs SZGPF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SZGPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while SZGPF trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas SZGPF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to SZGPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and SZGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs CKSNF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CKSNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while CKSNF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas CKSNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to CKSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to CKSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs SZGPY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while SZGPY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to SZGPY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to SZGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs CUGCF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while CUGCF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs USNZY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while USNZY trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to USNZY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and USNZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs SYPLF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SYPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while SYPLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas SYPLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to SYPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to SYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs KLKNF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 827.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while KLKNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and KLKNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs ERELY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while ERELY trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and ERELY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs YDWAF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 666.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while YDWAF trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and YDWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs CUGCY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while CUGCY trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to CUGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs FEEXY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 409.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while FEEXY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -8.19. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to FEEXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs OSKXF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while OSKXF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to OSKXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs FEEXF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 364.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while FEEXF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and FEEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs MTGRF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while MTGRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to MTGRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to MTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs MTGRY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while MTGRY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to MTGRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs AMSIY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs VLPNY Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while VLPNY trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to VLPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs WEBC Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WEBC has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while WEBC trades at $178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas WEBC's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to WEBC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to WEBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs GRRLF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while GRRLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs ARCXF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs TWIRF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while TWIRF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and TWIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs IRNRF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while IRNRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY is less volatile compared to IRNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMTLY.
HMTLY vs GSIH Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while GSIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and GSIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs HMTLF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HMTLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while HMTLF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas HMTLF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to HMTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and HMTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs NPSTF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NPSTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while NPSTF trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas NPSTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to NPSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HMTLY has daily volatility of 0.00 and NPSTF has daily volatility of N/A.
HMTLY vs ZNGGF Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ZNGGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while ZNGGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas ZNGGF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to ZNGGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and ZNGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMTLY vs CWRN Comparison
HMTLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMTLY stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CWRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMTLY is priced at $265.75, while CWRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMTLY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.23, whereas CWRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMTLY's ROE is N/A, compared to CWRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMTLY and CWRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).