AMTD Digital Inc.
AMTD Digital Inc. HKD Peers
See (HKD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKD | $2.09 | -0.48% | 1B | 9.09 | $0.23 | N/A |
| SAP | $309.75 | +0.21% | 361.4B | 56.01 | $5.53 | +0.85% |
| CRM | $274.57 | +2.78% | 262.5B | 42.90 | $6.40 | +0.59% |
| INTU | $771.58 | +0.64% | 215.2B | 62.88 | $12.27 | +0.52% |
| NOW | $1,030.36 | +1.25% | 213.4B | 139.62 | $7.38 | N/A |
| UBER | $85.60 | +1.09% | 179B | 14.99 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $111.41 | +6.07% | 146.2B | 90.58 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $417.89 | +0.91% | 141.4B | 75.43 | $5.54 | N/A |
| MSTR | $374.47 | +1.54% | 95B | -16.84 | -$22.24 | N/A |
| CDNS | $296.95 | +0.22% | 81.1B | 74.80 | $3.97 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HKD vs SAP Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 361.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while SAP trades at $309.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 56.01. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs CRM Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 262.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while CRM trades at $274.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs INTU Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 215.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while INTU trades at $771.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 62.88. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs NOW Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while NOW trades at $1,030.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 139.62. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs UBER Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while UBER trades at $85.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs SHOP Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while SHOP trades at $111.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 90.58. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs APP Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while APP trades at $417.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 75.43. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs MSTR Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while MSTR trades at $374.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.84. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs CDNS Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while CDNS trades at $296.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 74.80. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs SNOW Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while SNOW trades at $210.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -50.21. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs WDAY Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while WDAY trades at $252.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 140.40. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ADSK Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ADSK trades at $297.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 64.06. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs TEAM Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while TEAM trades at $214.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -130.80. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs FICO Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while FICO trades at $1,774.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 76.46. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs DDOG Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while DDOG trades at $122.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 259.91. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs TTD Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while TTD trades at $71.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 87.15. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs HUBS Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while HUBS trades at $609.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1450.64. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ANSS Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ANSS trades at $339.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 50.38. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs STRK Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while STRK trades at $105.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs STRF Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while STRF trades at $103.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs TYL Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while TYL trades at $576.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.55. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ZM Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ZM trades at $80.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs DUOL Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while DUOL trades at $512.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 250.19. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs GWRE Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while GWRE trades at $255.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 580.82. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs GRAB Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while GRAB trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 517.00. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs PTC Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while PTC trades at $170.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.67. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs SSNC Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while SSNC trades at $80.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs AZPN Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs DT Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while DT trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs MNDY Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while MNDY trades at $305.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 302.33. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs PAYC Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while PAYC trades at $265.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 37.81. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs DOCU Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while DOCU trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs BSY Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while BSY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 63.78. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs BKI Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs MANH Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while MANH trades at $192.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 54.92. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs NICE Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while NICE trades at $176.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs XM Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs QXO Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while QXO trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -54.30. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs CDAY Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs PCTY Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while PCTY trades at $194.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 48.45. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs U Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while U trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas U's P/E ratio is -22.43. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs PCOR Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while PCOR trades at $67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.91. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs DAY Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while DAY trades at $60.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 377.69. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs TTAN Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while TTAN trades at $106.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ESTC Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ESTC trades at $86.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -83.03. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs PEGA Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while PEGA trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 47.45. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs DSGX Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while DSGX trades at $102.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.97. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs CVLT Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while CVLT trades at $188.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 109.56. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs GTLB Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while GTLB trades at $48.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1219.25. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs NATI Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs SMAR Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs APPF Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while APPF trades at $217.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs SRAD Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while SRAD trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 126.84. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs OTEX Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while OTEX trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs CWAN Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while CWAN trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs VERX Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while VERX trades at $41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -141.62. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs LYFT Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while LYFT trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 103.50. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs COUP Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs IDCC Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while IDCC trades at $227.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs QTWO Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while QTWO trades at $91.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -268.59. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ETWO-WT Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs BULL Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while BULL trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs FROG Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while FROG trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.21. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs LIF Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while LIF trades at $63.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 491.27. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs INTA Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while INTA trades at $58.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -242.62. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs BILL Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while BILL trades at $45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2280.00. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs FRSH Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while FRSH trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -65.37. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs GRND Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while GRND trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -38.90. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs CVT Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs PYCR Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs RUMBW Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while RUMBW trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs SOUN Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while SOUN trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs RUM Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while RUM trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs WK Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while WK trades at $69.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs PWSC Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ZI Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs BL Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while BL trades at $57.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs AYX Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs RIOT Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while RIOT trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ASAN Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ASAN trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ENV Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs INST Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs COMP Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while COMP trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.42. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ZETA Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ZETA trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -55.68. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs BRZE Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while BRZE trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -29.44. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs KC Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while KC trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs NCNO Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while NCNO trades at $27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -109.28. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs AGYS Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while AGYS trades at $112.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 137.76. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs GBTG Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while GBTG trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -65.65. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ALKT Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ALKT trades at $30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -82.32. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs CALX Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while CALX trades at $48.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -92.44. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs BLKB Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while BLKB trades at $63.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs DAVEW Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while DAVEW trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs DAVE Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while DAVE trades at $221.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 62.41. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ALRM Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ALRM trades at $58.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs ALIT Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while ALIT trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -90.83. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs PRGS Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while PRGS trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs BTDR Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while BTDR trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.
HKD vs CLSK Comparison
HKD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKD stands at 1B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKD is priced at $2.09, while CLSK trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.09, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, HKD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKD is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKD.