Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. HIMS Peers
See (HIMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIMS | $41.98 | -34.64% | 9B | 61.73 | $0.68 | N/A |
| PG | $161.02 | +1.22% | 377.5B | 25.60 | $6.29 | +2.54% |
| UL | $62.36 | +1.79% | 153.3B | 23.71 | $2.63 | +3.12% |
| CL | $88.65 | +0.99% | 71.8B | 25.11 | $3.53 | +2.29% |
| KMB | $130.13 | +1.43% | 43.2B | 17.73 | $7.34 | +3.82% |
| KVUE | $21.36 | -0.14% | 41B | 38.14 | $0.56 | +3.86% |
| EL | $78.84 | +4.85% | 28.4B | -32.58 | -$2.42 | +2.17% |
| CHD | $96.95 | +0.54% | 23.9B | 41.61 | $2.33 | +1.20% |
| CLX | $122.27 | +1.24% | 15.1B | 21.95 | $5.57 | +4.00% |
| SGI | $66.14 | +1.28% | 13.8B | 42.39 | $1.56 | +0.46% |
Stock Comparison
HIMS vs PG Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 377.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while PG trades at $161.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs UL Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 153.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while UL trades at $62.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs CL Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while CL trades at $88.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs KMB Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while KMB trades at $130.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs KVUE Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while KVUE trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs EL Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while EL trades at $78.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -32.58. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs CHD Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while CHD trades at $96.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 41.61. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs CLX Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while CLX trades at $122.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SGI Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while SGI trades at $66.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs ELF Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while ELF trades at $123.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 64.16. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs NTCO Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs IPAR Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while IPAR trades at $134.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs COTY Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while COTY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs NWL Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while NWL trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SPB Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while SPB trades at $52.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs EPC Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while EPC trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs PHH Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 795.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while PHH trades at $30.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 1507.50. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs HELE Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 629.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while HELE trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs NUS Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 378.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while NUS trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SLSN Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 364.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while SLSN trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 104.00. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs EWCZ Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 250.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while EWCZ trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SKIN Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while SKIN trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs ACU Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while ACU trades at $38.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs GROV Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while GROV trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs UG Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while UG trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs RAY Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while RAY trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs MTEX Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while MTEX trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -83.82. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs BRSH Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs DSY Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while DSY trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 126.20. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs TANH Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while TANH trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs TKLF Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while TKLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs BRSHW Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs REV Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SUMR Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 9B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $41.98, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.73, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.