Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. HIMS Peers
See (HIMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIMS | $56.76 | +0.35% | 12.2B | 83.47 | $0.68 | N/A |
| PG | $167.79 | -1.24% | 393.4B | 26.63 | $6.30 | +2.39% |
| UL | $63.40 | -0.69% | 158.3B | 24.38 | $2.60 | +3.04% |
| CL | $91.95 | -1.07% | 74.5B | 26.05 | $3.53 | +2.16% |
| KMB | $141.68 | -1.45% | 47B | 19.30 | $7.34 | +3.41% |
| KVUE | $23.68 | -0.82% | 45.5B | 42.28 | $0.56 | +3.45% |
| CHD | $99.06 | +0.76% | 24.4B | 42.52 | $2.33 | +1.17% |
| EL | $66.68 | -0.40% | 24B | -27.55 | -$2.42 | +3.51% |
| CLX | $130.17 | -1.30% | 16B | 23.37 | $5.57 | +3.71% |
| SGI | $63.98 | -1.66% | 13.3B | 41.01 | $1.56 | +0.46% |
Stock Comparison
HIMS vs PG Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 393.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while PG trades at $167.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs UL Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 158.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while UL trades at $63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs CL Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while CL trades at $91.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs KMB Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while KMB trades at $141.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs KVUE Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while KVUE trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs CHD Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while CHD trades at $99.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs EL Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while EL trades at $66.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -27.55. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs CLX Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while CLX trades at $130.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SGI Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while SGI trades at $63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 41.01. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs ELF Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while ELF trades at $113.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs NTCO Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs IPAR Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while IPAR trades at $136.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs COTY Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while COTY trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs NWL Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while NWL trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SPB Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while SPB trades at $54.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs EPC Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while EPC trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs HELE Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 602.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while HELE trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs NUS Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 411.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while NUS trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs PHH Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while PHH trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 721.00. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SLSN Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while SLSN trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 80.60. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs EWCZ Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while EWCZ trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SKIN Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while SKIN trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs ACU Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 150.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while ACU trades at $39.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs GROV Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while GROV trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs RAY Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while RAY trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 48.17. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs UG Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while UG trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs MTEX Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while MTEX trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -87.27. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs BRSH Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs DSY Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while DSY trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs TANH Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while TANH trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs TKLF Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while TKLF trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs BRSHW Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs REV Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.
HIMS vs SUMR Comparison
HIMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMS stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HIMS is priced at $56.76, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMS currently has a P/E ratio of 83.47, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, HIMS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMS is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMS.