HFCL Limited
HFCL Limited (HFCL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HFCL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFCL.NS | ₹70.68 | +0.00% | 108.9B | 197.67 | ₹0.36 | +0.14% |
| ITI.NS | ₹274.55 | +0.00% | 260B | -176.86 | -₹1.53 | N/A |
| ITI.BO | ₹274.00 | +0.00% | 259.8B | -175.58 | -₹1.54 | N/A |
| CPPLUS.NS | ₹1,674.50 | +0.00% | 202.5B | 79.60 | ₹21.60 | N/A |
| HFCL.BO | ₹70.50 | +0.00% | 108.5B | 197.03 | ₹0.36 | +0.14% |
| STLTECH.NS | ₹184.86 | +0.00% | 92B | 2693.71 | ₹0.07 | N/A |
| ASTRAMICRO.BO | ₹909.15 | +0.00% | 84.6B | 52.64 | ₹16.93 | +0.25% |
| ASTRAMICRO.NS | ₹908.65 | +0.00% | 84.6B | 52.90 | ₹16.84 | +0.25% |
| TEJASNET.NS | ₹432.30 | +0.00% | 77.3B | -9.97 | -₹43.74 | +0.57% |
| TEJASNET.BO | ₹432.20 | +0.00% | 77.3B | -9.96 | -₹43.75 | +0.57% |
Stock Comparison
HFCL.NS vs ITI.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, ITI.NS has a market cap of 260B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while ITI.NS trades at ₹274.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas ITI.NS's P/E ratio is -176.86. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITI.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to ITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check ITI.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs ITI.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, ITI.BO has a market cap of 259.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while ITI.BO trades at ₹274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas ITI.BO's P/E ratio is -175.58. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITI.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to ITI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check ITI.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs CPPLUS.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, CPPLUS.NS has a market cap of 202.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while CPPLUS.NS trades at ₹1,674.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas CPPLUS.NS's P/E ratio is 79.60. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPPLUS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to CPPLUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check CPPLUS.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs HFCL.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, HFCL.BO has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while HFCL.BO trades at ₹70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas HFCL.BO's P/E ratio is 197.03. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HFCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to HFCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check HFCL.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs STLTECH.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, STLTECH.NS has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while STLTECH.NS trades at ₹184.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas STLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 2693.71. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STLTECH.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to STLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check STLTECH.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs ASTRAMICRO.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, ASTRAMICRO.BO has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while ASTRAMICRO.BO trades at ₹909.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas ASTRAMICRO.BO's P/E ratio is 52.64. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASTRAMICRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAMICRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check ASTRAMICRO.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs ASTRAMICRO.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, ASTRAMICRO.NS has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while ASTRAMICRO.NS trades at ₹908.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas ASTRAMICRO.NS's P/E ratio is 52.90. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASTRAMICRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAMICRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check ASTRAMICRO.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs TEJASNET.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, TEJASNET.NS has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while TEJASNET.NS trades at ₹432.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas TEJASNET.NS's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TEJASNET.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to TEJASNET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check TEJASNET.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs TEJASNET.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, TEJASNET.BO has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while TEJASNET.BO trades at ₹432.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas TEJASNET.BO's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TEJASNET.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to TEJASNET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check TEJASNET.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs AVANTEL.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, AVANTEL.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while AVANTEL.BO trades at ₹126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas AVANTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 326.67. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVANTEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to AVANTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check AVANTEL.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs AVANTEL.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, AVANTEL.NS has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while AVANTEL.NS trades at ₹126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas AVANTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 326.62. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVANTEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to AVANTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check AVANTEL.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs DLINKINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, DLINKINDIA.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while DLINKINDIA.BO trades at ₹395.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas DLINKINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLINKINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to DLINKINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check DLINKINDIA.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs DLINKINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, DLINKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while DLINKINDIA.NS trades at ₹396.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas DLINKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLINKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to DLINKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check DLINKINDIA.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs NELCO.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, NELCO.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while NELCO.NS trades at ₹586.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas NELCO.NS's P/E ratio is -743.48. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NELCO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to NELCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check NELCO.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs NELCO.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, NELCO.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while NELCO.BO trades at ₹586.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas NELCO.BO's P/E ratio is -742.78. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NELCO.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to NELCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check NELCO.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs GTLINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, GTLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while GTLINFRA.BO trades at ₹1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas GTLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GTLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to GTLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check GTLINFRA.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs GTLINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, GTLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while GTLINFRA.NS trades at ₹1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas GTLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GTLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to GTLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check GTLINFRA.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs PARACABLES.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, PARACABLES.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while PARACABLES.NS trades at ₹34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas PARACABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PARACABLES.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to PARACABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check PARACABLES.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs PARACABLES.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, PARACABLES.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while PARACABLES.BO trades at ₹34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas PARACABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PARACABLES.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to PARACABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check PARACABLES.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs VALIANT.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, VALIANT.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while VALIANT.BO trades at ₹1,039.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas VALIANT.BO's P/E ratio is 58.13. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VALIANT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to VALIANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check VALIANT.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs ADCINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, ADCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while ADCINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,239.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas ADCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADCINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to ADCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check ADCINDIA.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs PANACHE.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, PANACHE.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while PANACHE.NS trades at ₹319.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas PANACHE.NS's P/E ratio is 55.75. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PANACHE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to PANACHE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check PANACHE.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs BIRLACABLE.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, BIRLACABLE.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while BIRLACABLE.BO trades at ₹130.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas BIRLACABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 50.93. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIRLACABLE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check BIRLACABLE.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs BIRLACABLE.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, BIRLACABLE.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while BIRLACABLE.NS trades at ₹129.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas BIRLACABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIRLACABLE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACABLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check BIRLACABLE.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs KAVDEFENCE.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, KAVDEFENCE.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while KAVDEFENCE.NS trades at ₹60.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas KAVDEFENCE.NS's P/E ratio is 123.82. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KAVDEFENCE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to KAVDEFENCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check KAVDEFENCE.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs KAVDEFENCE.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, KAVDEFENCE.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while KAVDEFENCE.BO trades at ₹60.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas KAVDEFENCE.BO's P/E ratio is 122.76. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KAVDEFENCE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to KAVDEFENCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check KAVDEFENCE.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs FROG.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, FROG.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while FROG.NS trades at ₹130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas FROG.NS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FROG.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to FROG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check FROG.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs PRECISIO.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, PRECISIO.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while PRECISIO.BO trades at ₹138.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas PRECISIO.BO's P/E ratio is 174.04. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRECISIO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to PRECISIO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check PRECISIO.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs SMARTLINK.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, SMARTLINK.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while SMARTLINK.BO trades at ₹125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas SMARTLINK.BO's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMARTLINK.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to SMARTLINK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check SMARTLINK.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs KAVVERITEL.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, KAVVERITEL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while KAVVERITEL.NS trades at ₹60.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas KAVVERITEL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.54. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KAVVERITEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to KAVVERITEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check KAVVERITEL.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs KAVVERITEL.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, KAVVERITEL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while KAVVERITEL.BO trades at ₹60.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas KAVVERITEL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.56. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KAVVERITEL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to KAVVERITEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check KAVVERITEL.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs SMARTLINK.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, SMARTLINK.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while SMARTLINK.NS trades at ₹116.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas SMARTLINK.NS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMARTLINK.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to SMARTLINK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check SMARTLINK.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs VINTRON.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, VINTRON.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while VINTRON.BO trades at ₹12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas VINTRON.BO's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VINTRON.BO's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to VINTRON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check VINTRON.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs MRO-TEK.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, MRO-TEK.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while MRO-TEK.NS trades at ₹61.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas MRO-TEK.NS's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRO-TEK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to MRO-TEK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check MRO-TEK.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs MRO-TEK.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, MRO-TEK.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while MRO-TEK.BO trades at ₹61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas MRO-TEK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRO-TEK.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to MRO-TEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check MRO-TEK.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs PTIL.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, PTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while PTIL.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas PTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.84. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTIL.BO's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to PTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check PTIL.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs AKSHOPTFBR.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, AKSHOPTFBR.BO has a market cap of 751.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while AKSHOPTFBR.BO trades at ₹4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas AKSHOPTFBR.BO's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AKSHOPTFBR.BO's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to AKSHOPTFBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check AKSHOPTFBR.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs AKSHOPTFBR.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, AKSHOPTFBR.NS has a market cap of 748.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while AKSHOPTFBR.NS trades at ₹4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas AKSHOPTFBR.NS's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AKSHOPTFBR.NS's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to AKSHOPTFBR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check AKSHOPTFBR.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs PUNJCOMMU.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, PUNJCOMMU.BO has a market cap of 587.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while PUNJCOMMU.BO trades at ₹50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas PUNJCOMMU.BO's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PUNJCOMMU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to PUNJCOMMU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check PUNJCOMMU.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs TNTELE.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, TNTELE.BO has a market cap of 430.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while TNTELE.BO trades at ₹8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas TNTELE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNTELE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to TNTELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check TNTELE.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs TNTELE.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, TNTELE.NS has a market cap of 416.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while TNTELE.NS trades at ₹9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas TNTELE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNTELE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to TNTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check TNTELE.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs SALORAINTL.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, SALORAINTL.BO has a market cap of 279.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while SALORAINTL.BO trades at ₹29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas SALORAINTL.BO's P/E ratio is -19.68. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SALORAINTL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to SALORAINTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check SALORAINTL.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs SHYAMTEL.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, SHYAMTEL.BO has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while SHYAMTEL.BO trades at ₹7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas SHYAMTEL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHYAMTEL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check SHYAMTEL.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs SHYAMTEL.NS Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, SHYAMTEL.NS has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while SHYAMTEL.NS trades at ₹8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas SHYAMTEL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHYAMTEL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check SHYAMTEL.NS's competition here
HFCL.NS vs CATVISION.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, CATVISION.BO has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while CATVISION.BO trades at ₹17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas CATVISION.BO's P/E ratio is -14.80. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CATVISION.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to CATVISION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check CATVISION.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs VCU.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, VCU.BO has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while VCU.BO trades at ₹6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas VCU.BO's P/E ratio is -52.73. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VCU.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is less volatile compared to VCU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check VCU.BO's competition here
HFCL.NS vs SPAR.BO Comparison March 2026
HFCL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFCL.NS stands at 108.9B. In comparison, SPAR.BO has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HFCL.NS is priced at ₹70.68, while SPAR.BO trades at ₹3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 197.67, whereas SPAR.BO's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, HFCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPAR.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HFCL.NS is more volatile compared to SPAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFCL.NS.Check SPAR.BO's competition here