Healthier Choices Management Corp.
Healthier Choices Management Corp. (HCMC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HCMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCMC | $0.00 | +0.00% | 24.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DNOPY | $11.05 | -1.53% | 108.3B | 24.02 | $0.46 | N/A |
| LBLCF | $49.99 | -0.12% | 58B | 32.74 | $1.50 | +0.81% |
| TSCDY | $20.12 | +0.00% | 43.6B | 21.63 | $0.93 | +2.75% |
| ADRNY | $47.06 | -0.04% | 42B | 15.96 | $2.97 | +2.86% |
| AHODF | $46.61 | -2.20% | 41.9B | 15.91 | $2.97 | +2.84% |
| TSCDF | $6.41 | -3.61% | 40.7B | 20.66 | $0.31 | +2.95% |
| SVNDF | $14.68 | +0.03% | 34.5B | 23.39 | $0.62 | +2.09% |
| SVNDY | $14.66 | +0.00% | 33.5B | 22.73 | $0.62 | +1.08% |
| WNGRF | $75.56 | +0.05% | 27.8B | 26.41 | $2.75 | +1.16% |
Stock Comparison
HCMC vs DNOPY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while DNOPY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check DNOPY's competition here
HCMC vs LBLCF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, LBLCF has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while LBLCF trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBLCF's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to LBLCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to LBLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check LBLCF's competition here
HCMC vs TSCDY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while TSCDY trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check TSCDY's competition here
HCMC vs ADRNY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while ADRNY trades at $47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check ADRNY's competition here
HCMC vs AHODF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while AHODF trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check AHODF's competition here
HCMC vs TSCDF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while TSCDF trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check TSCDF's competition here
HCMC vs SVNDF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while SVNDF trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check SVNDF's competition here
HCMC vs SVNDY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while SVNDY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check SVNDY's competition here
HCMC vs WNGRF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while WNGRF trades at $75.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check WNGRF's competition here
HCMC vs WOLWF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while WOLWF trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check WOLWF's competition here
HCMC vs CLEGF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CLEGF trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CLEGF's competition here
HCMC vs KKOYY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while KKOYY trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check KKOYY's competition here
HCMC vs MTRAF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while MTRAF trades at $71.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check MTRAF's competition here
HCMC vs CVPBF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CVPBF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CVPBF's competition here
HCMC vs CRERF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CRERF trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CRERF's competition here
HCMC vs CRRFY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CRRFY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CRRFY's competition here
HCMC vs CPPCY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CPPCY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CPPCY's competition here
HCMC vs CVPUF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CVPUF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CVPUF's competition here
HCMC vs JSAIY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while JSAIY trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check JSAIY's competition here
HCMC vs JSNSF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while JSNSF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check JSNSF's competition here
HCMC vs KKOYF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while KKOYF trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check KKOYF's competition here
HCMC vs EMLAF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while EMLAF trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check EMLAF's competition here
HCMC vs BMBRF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check BMBRF's competition here
HCMC vs GCHEF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while GCHEF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check GCHEF's competition here
HCMC vs AXFOY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check AXFOY's competition here
HCMC vs DFILF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while DFILF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is -14.96. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to DFILF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check DFILF's competition here
HCMC vs KOBNF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while KOBNF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check KOBNF's competition here
HCMC vs CUYTF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CUYTF's competition here
HCMC vs AXFOF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check AXFOF's competition here
HCMC vs DFIHY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while DFIHY trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check DFIHY's competition here
HCMC vs CUYTY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CUYTY trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CUYTY's competition here
HCMC vs SHUFF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while SHUFF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check SHUFF's competition here
HCMC vs OCDDY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while OCDDY trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check OCDDY's competition here
HCMC vs OCDGF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while OCDGF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check OCDGF's competition here
HCMC vs GGGSY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while GGGSY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check GGGSY's competition here
HCMC vs GGGSF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while GGGSF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check GGGSF's competition here
HCMC vs NNWWF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while NNWWF trades at $40.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check NNWWF's competition here
HCMC vs CGUSY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CGUSY's competition here
HCMC vs RLEVF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check RLEVF's competition here
HCMC vs EUSHY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while EUSHY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check EUSHY's competition here
HCMC vs EUSHF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check EUSHF's competition here
HCMC vs CGUIF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while CGUIF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check CGUIF's competition here
HCMC vs FLOCF Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check FLOCF's competition here
HCMC vs IFMK Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while IFMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check IFMK's competition here
HCMC vs MTVX Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check MTVX's competition here
HCMC vs OMHI Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 10.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check OMHI's competition here
HCMC vs HWIN Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while HWIN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to HWIN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC and HWIN have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check HWIN's competition here
HCMC vs MFLTY Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check MFLTY's competition here
HCMC vs QKLS Comparison February 2026
HCMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMC stands at 24.1M. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, HCMC is priced at $0.00, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMC's ROE is +3.06%, compared to QKLS's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMC is more volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMC.Check QKLS's competition here