Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF HBTA Peers
See (HBTA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBTA | $23.68 | +2.45% | 941.2K | 29.75 | $0.80 | N/A |
| BNJ | $15.17 | +0.13% | 94.2B | N/A | N/A | +0.58% |
| SFB | $20.29 | +0.81% | 9.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.85% |
| MGR | $20.49 | +0.99% | 5B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRD | $15.15 | +0.93% | 5B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRB | $16.70 | +1.30% | 5B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| BULLW | $3.43 | +9.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +14.10% |
| CGBDL | $25.85 | +0.86% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +7.90% |
| FCRX | $24.88 | +0.40% | 922.1M | 175.21 | $0.14 | +5.04% |
Stock Comparison
HBTA vs BNJ Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while BNJ trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs SFB Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while SFB trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs MGR Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while MGR trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs MGRD Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while MGRD trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs MGRB Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while MGRB trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs BULLW Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while BULLW trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs TRINL Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs CGBDL Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while CGBDL trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs FCRX Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 922.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while FCRX trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 175.21. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs GLADZ Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 567.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while GLADZ trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs SAJ Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 388.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while SAJ trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs SAY Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 387.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while SAY trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs SAZ Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 385.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while SAZ trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs BTMWW Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 279.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while BTMWW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs WHFCL Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while WHFCL trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs GECCZ Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while GECCZ trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs RILYZ Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while RILYZ trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs GEGGL Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while GEGGL trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs STSB Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs ZBAI Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while ZBAI trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs CAS Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while CAS trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.
HBTA vs GJH Comparison
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 941.2K. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $23.68, while GJH trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.75, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.