Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HBTA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBTA | $26.31 | +0.35% | 1M | 31.77 | $0.83 | N/A |
| BNJ | $15.52 | +0.78% | 112.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.50% |
| SFB | $20.39 | -1.55% | 11.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.56% |
| MGRB | $17.31 | +0.17% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGR | $21.04 | +0.33% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRD | $15.65 | +0.71% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| CGBDL | $26.17 | +1.00% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +7.83% |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +13.56% |
| FCRX | $24.80 | -0.04% | 919.1M | 174.65 | $0.14 | +5.04% |
| BULLW | $6.60 | +0.15% | 919M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HBTA vs BNJ Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while BNJ trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check BNJ's competition here
HBTA vs SFB Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while SFB trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check SFB's competition here
HBTA vs MGRB Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while MGRB trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check MGRB's competition here
HBTA vs MGR Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while MGR trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check MGR's competition here
HBTA vs MGRD Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while MGRD trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check MGRD's competition here
HBTA vs CGBDL Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while CGBDL trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check CGBDL's competition here
HBTA vs TRINL Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check TRINL's competition here
HBTA vs FCRX Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 919.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while FCRX trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 174.65. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check FCRX's competition here
HBTA vs BULLW Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 919M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while BULLW trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to BULLW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check BULLW's competition here
HBTA vs GLADZ Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 638M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while GLADZ trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check GLADZ's competition here
HBTA vs SAJ Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 406.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while SAJ trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check SAJ's competition here
HBTA vs SAZ Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 401.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while SAZ trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to SAZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check SAZ's competition here
HBTA vs SAY Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 399.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while SAY trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to SAY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check SAY's competition here
HBTA vs BTMWW Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while BTMWW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check BTMWW's competition here
HBTA vs WHFCL Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 209.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while WHFCL trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check WHFCL's competition here
HBTA vs RILYZ Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while RILYZ trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check RILYZ's competition here
HBTA vs GECCZ Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while GECCZ trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check GECCZ's competition here
HBTA vs GEGGL Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while GEGGL trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check GEGGL's competition here
HBTA vs STSB Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check STSB's competition here
HBTA vs CAS Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while CAS trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is more volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check CAS's competition here
HBTA vs ZBAI Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while ZBAI trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check ZBAI's competition here
HBTA vs GJH Comparison July 2025
HBTA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBTA stands at 1M. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBTA is priced at $26.31, while GJH trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBTA currently has a P/E ratio of 31.77, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBTA's ROE is N/A, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBTA is less volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBTA.Check GJH's competition here