HSBC Holdings plc
HSBC Holdings plc HBCYF Peers
See (HBCYF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBCYF | $11.90 | +2.63% | 209.74B | 10.92 | $1.09 | +8.49% |
| BACRP | $193.00 | N/A | 333.74B | N/A | N/A | +3.63% |
| IDCBY | $14.33 | +0.99% | 332.55B | 5.33 | $2.69 | +8.02% |
| IDCBF | $0.68 | N/A | 313.75B | 5.23 | $0.13 | +9.26% |
| ACGBY | $16.06 | +0.50% | 267.15B | 6.18 | $2.60 | +6.93% |
| ACGBF | $0.60 | N/A | 248.44B | 6.00 | $0.10 | +8.10% |
| WFCNP | $1.25 | +0.01% | 247.90B | 0.31 | $4.03 | +2.13% |
| CICHY | $17.75 | +1.37% | 225.99B | 4.96 | $3.58 | +11.07% |
| BACHY | $14.96 | +1.01% | 215.82B | 5.75 | $2.60 | +9.71% |
| CICHF | $0.88 | +0.57% | 211.57B | 4.89 | $0.18 | +12.74% |
Stock Comparison
HBCYF vs BACRP Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 333.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BACRP trades at $193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs IDCBY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 332.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while IDCBY trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs IDCBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 313.75B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while IDCBF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ACGBY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 267.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while ACGBY trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ACGBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 248.44B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while ACGBF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs WFCNP Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 247.90B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while WFCNP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CICHY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 225.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while CICHY trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BACHY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 215.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BACHY trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CICHF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 211.57B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while CICHF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BACHF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 208.35B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BACHF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CMWAY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 186.85B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while CMWAY trades at $111.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CBAUF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 171.66B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while CBAUF trades at $102.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs MBFJF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 156.83B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while MBFJF trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCDRF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 120.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BCDRF trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SMFNF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 90.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while SMFNF trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BBVXF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 89.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BBVXF trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NAUBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 77.59B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while NAUBF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NABZY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 73.87B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while NABZY trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCMXY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 72.71B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BCMXY trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BKFCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 70.37B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs WEBNF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 69.19B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while WEBNF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCLYF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 62.95B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BCLYF trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs INGVF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 61.31B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while INGVF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs RBSPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 55.50B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while RBSPF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ANZGY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 55.34B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while ANZGY trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ANEWF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.37B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SCBFY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 37.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while SCBFY trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SCBFF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 37.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while SCBFF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NTIOF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 36.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while NTIOF trades at $92.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NBKCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 35.76B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs TDBKF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SVNLY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 27.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while SVNLY trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SVNLF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 26.34B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while SVNLF trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs RBCPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs FANDF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 23.31B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while FANDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNSPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.56B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ABMRF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 21.22B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while ABMRF trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs AAVMY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 20.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while AAVMY trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNDSF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BNDSF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNDSY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 16.12B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BNDSY trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs EFGXY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs EFGIF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while EFGIF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ALORY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while ALORY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CSGKF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs FANDY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while FANDY trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs VUPPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 612.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs PRRCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while PRRCF trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCSO Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 209.74B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 74.64M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $11.90, while BCSO trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.