HSBC Holdings plc
HSBC Holdings plc HBCYF Peers
See (HBCYF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBCYF | $12.61 | -0.22% | 219.8B | 11.57 | $1.09 | +7.97% |
| IDCBF | $0.79 | +0.00% | 362.7B | 5.64 | $0.14 | +5.44% |
| IDCBY | $15.53 | -0.51% | 362B | 5.75 | $2.70 | +4.23% |
| BACRP | $192.01 | +0.00% | 356.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.65% |
| ACGBY | $16.90 | -0.65% | 293.3B | 6.45 | $2.61 | +3.79% |
| ACGBF | $0.66 | +0.00% | 286B | 6.60 | $0.10 | +5.11% |
| WFCNP | $1.50 | +0.00% | 259.4B | 0.37 | $4.03 | +1.94% |
| CICHY | $21.10 | -1.12% | 254.2B | 5.87 | $3.60 | +4.08% |
| BACHY | $14.88 | +0.47% | 238.5B | 5.72 | $2.61 | +4.26% |
| CICHF | $0.98 | -5.08% | 235.6B | 5.44 | $0.18 | +5.71% |
Stock Comparison
HBCYF vs IDCBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 362.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while IDCBF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs IDCBY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 362B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while IDCBY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BACRP Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 356.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BACRP trades at $192.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ACGBY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 293.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while ACGBY trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ACGBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 286B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while ACGBF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs WFCNP Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 259.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while WFCNP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CICHY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 254.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while CICHY trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BACHY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BACHY trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CICHF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 235.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while CICHF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BACHF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 212.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BACHF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CBAUF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 195.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while CBAUF trades at $116.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CMWAY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 189.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while CMWAY trades at $113.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs MBFJF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 169.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while MBFJF trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCDRF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 127.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BCDRF trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SMFNF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while SMFNF trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BKFCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BKFCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BBVXF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BBVXF trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NAUBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while NAUBF trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NABZY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while NABZY trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs WEBNF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while WEBNF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs INGVF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while INGVF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCLYF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BCLYF trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ANZGY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while ANZGY trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ANEWF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs RBSPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while RBSPF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCMXY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BCMXY trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SCBFY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while SCBFY trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SCBFF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while SCBFF trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NTIOF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while NTIOF trades at $104.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NBKCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs TDBKF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs RBCPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ABMRF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while ABMRF trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SVNLY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while SVNLY trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SVNLF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while SVNLF trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs FANDF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while FANDF trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs AAVMY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while AAVMY trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNSPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNDSF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BNDSF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNDSY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BNDSY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ALORY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while ALORY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs EFGXY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs EFGIF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while EFGIF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CSGKF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs FANDY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while FANDY trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs PRRCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while PRRCF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs VUPPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCSO Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs TNTTF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ANZBY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 219.8B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.61, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.