HSBC Holdings plc
HSBC Holdings plc HBCYF Peers
See (HBCYF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBCYF | $12.08 | -2.34% | 203.2B | 10.66 | $1.09 | +8.68% |
| BACRP | $219.00 | +15.87% | 357.1B | N/A | N/A | +3.35% |
| IDCBF | $0.79 | -0.77% | 349.6B | 6.15 | $0.13 | +7.87% |
| IDCBY | $16.09 | +2.34% | 347.4B | 5.87 | $2.70 | +1.92% |
| ACGBF | $0.74 | +15.72% | 292.5B | 7.43 | $0.10 | +2.18% |
| ACGBY | $18.25 | +2.76% | 280.4B | 6.82 | $2.61 | +1.76% |
| CICHY | $20.80 | +2.77% | 259.3B | 5.69 | $3.59 | +9.58% |
| BACHY | $14.65 | +1.24% | 236.6B | 5.59 | $2.61 | +9.94% |
| CICHF | $0.99 | +0.00% | 228.4B | 5.28 | $0.18 | +11.80% |
| BACHF | $0.58 | -0.36% | 217.5B | 5.93 | $0.10 | +11.27% |
Stock Comparison
HBCYF vs BACRP Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 357.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BACRP trades at $219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs IDCBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 349.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while IDCBF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs IDCBY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 347.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while IDCBY trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ACGBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 292.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while ACGBF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ACGBY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 280.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while ACGBY trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CICHY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 259.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while CICHY trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BACHY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 236.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BACHY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CICHF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 228.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while CICHF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BACHF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 217.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BACHF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CBAUF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 203.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while CBAUF trades at $121.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CMWAY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 202.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while CMWAY trades at $120.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs MBFJF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while MBFJF trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCDRF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BCDRF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SMFNF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while SMFNF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BBVXF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BBVXF trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NABZY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while NABZY trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NAUBF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while NAUBF trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BKFCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BKFCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs WEBNF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while WEBNF trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs INGVF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while INGVF trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCLYF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BCLYF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ANZGY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while ANZGY trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs RBSPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while RBSPF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ANEWF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCMXY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BCMXY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NTIOF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while NTIOF trades at $103.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs NBKCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SCBFY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while SCBFY trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SCBFF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while SCBFF trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs TDBKF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SVNLF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while SVNLF trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs SVNLY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while SVNLY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs RBCPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs FANDF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while FANDF trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ABMRF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while ABMRF trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs AAVMY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while AAVMY trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNSPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNDSF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BNDSF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BNDSY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BNDSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs WFCNP Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while WFCNP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ALORY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while ALORY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs EFGIF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while EFGIF trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs EFGXY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs CSGKF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs FANDY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while FANDY trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs VUPPF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs PRRCF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 547.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while PRRCF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs BCSO Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs ANZBY Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.
HBCYF vs TNTTF Comparison
HBCYF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBCYF stands at 203.2B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBCYF is priced at $12.08, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, HBCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HBCYF is more volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBCYF.