Hasbro, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HAS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HAS
Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAS | $90.16 | +0.87% | 12.7B | -39.20 | -$2.30 | +3.11% |
| CCL | $25.64 | -3.54% | 35.5B | 11.30 | $2.27 | +0.59% |
| CUK | $25.58 | -3.47% | 34B | 11.27 | $2.27 | +0.59% |
| AS | $33.40 | -1.36% | 19.3B | 43.95 | $0.76 | N/A |
| LTH | $26.99 | +3.37% | 6B | 16.26 | $1.66 | N/A |
| PLNT | $73.29 | +1.59% | 5.9B | 27.97 | $2.62 | N/A |
| GOLF | $93.88 | +0.35% | 5.5B | 30.19 | $3.11 | +1.02% |
| MAT | $14.36 | -1.37% | 4.5B | 11.58 | $1.24 | N/A |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
| SEAS | $50.30 | +2.49% | 3.2B | 13.27 | $3.79 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HAS vs CCL Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while CCL trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CCL's competition here
HAS vs CUK Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while CUK trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CUK's competition here
HAS vs AS Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while AS trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 43.95. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check AS's competition here
HAS vs LTH Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while LTH trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check LTH's competition here
HAS vs PLNT Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while PLNT trades at $73.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check PLNT's competition here
HAS vs GOLF Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while GOLF trades at $93.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS and GOLF have similar daily volatility (3.56).Check GOLF's competition here
HAS vs MAT Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while MAT trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check MAT's competition here
HAS vs ELY Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ELY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ELY's competition here
HAS vs SEAS Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check SEAS's competition here
HAS vs YETI Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while YETI trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check YETI's competition here
HAS vs MODG Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while MODG trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to MODG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check MODG's competition here
HAS vs SIX Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check SIX's competition here
HAS vs VSTO Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check VSTO's competition here
HAS vs CALY Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CALY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while CALY trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas CALY's P/E ratio is 66.05. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CALY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CALY's competition here
HAS vs OSW Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while OSW trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check OSW's competition here
HAS vs PTON Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while PTON trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -38.17. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check PTON's competition here
HAS vs PRKS Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while PRKS trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check PRKS's competition here
HAS vs FUN Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while FUN trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to FUN's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check FUN's competition here
HAS vs LUCK Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while LUCK trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -13.02. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LUCK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check LUCK's competition here
HAS vs GEAR Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check GEAR's competition here
HAS vs JOUT Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 486.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while JOUT trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -21.26. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check JOUT's competition here
HAS vs HERE Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, HERE has a market cap of 368.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while HERE trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas HERE's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to HERE's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to HERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check HERE's competition here
HAS vs CNXA Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CNXA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CNXA's competition here
HAS vs ESCA Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while ESCA trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ESCA's competition here
HAS vs JAKK Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 230.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while JAKK trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check JAKK's competition here
HAS vs XPOF Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 226.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while XPOF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check XPOF's competition here
HAS vs SRM Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while SRM trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SRM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check SRM's competition here
HAS vs FNKO Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 180.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while FNKO trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check FNKO's competition here
HAS vs PLBY Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while PLBY trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check PLBY's competition here
HAS vs AOUT Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while AOUT trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check AOUT's competition here
HAS vs CLAR Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while CLAR trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CLAR's competition here
HAS vs TRON Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, TRON has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while TRON trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas TRON's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TRON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to TRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check TRON's competition here
HAS vs AGH Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while AGH trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -14.52. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check AGH's competition here
HAS vs NOMA Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NOMA has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while NOMA trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas NOMA's P/E ratio is -22.32. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to NOMA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check NOMA's competition here
HAS vs ISPO Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while ISPO trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ISPO's competition here
HAS vs BTN Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check BTN's competition here
HAS vs KMRK Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, KMRK has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while KMRK trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas KMRK's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to KMRK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to KMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check KMRK's competition here
HAS vs NLS Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check NLS's competition here
HAS vs FGH Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check FGH's competition here
HAS vs DOGZ Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while DOGZ trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DOGZ's competition here
HAS vs YYAI Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while YYAI trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to YYAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check YYAI's competition here
HAS vs FXLV Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while FXLV trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check FXLV's competition here
HAS vs NWTG Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while NWTG trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check NWTG's competition here
HAS vs HWH Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while HWH trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to HWH's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check HWH's competition here
HAS vs MMA Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while MMA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to MMA's ROE of -20.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check MMA's competition here
HAS vs GDHG Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while GDHG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check GDHG's competition here
HAS vs SPGC Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check SPGC's competition here
HAS vs ISPOW Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ISPOW's competition here
HAS vs BBIG Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 74.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check BBIG's competition here
HAS vs DS-PD Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DS-PD's competition here
HAS vs DS Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DS's competition here
HAS vs DS-PC Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DS-PC's competition here
HAS vs DVD Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DVD's competition here
HAS vs DS-PB Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DS-PB's competition here
HAS vs ILG Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, ILG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while ILG trades at $34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas ILG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ILG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to ILG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ILG's competition here
HAS vs BWL-A Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check BWL-A's competition here
HAS vs MYCC Comparison April 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 12.7B. In comparison, MYCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $90.16, while MYCC trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.20, whereas MYCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.55%, compared to MYCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to MYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check MYCC's competition here