Hasbro, Inc.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 28.76B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while CCL trades at $22.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 26.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while CUK trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 16.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while AS trades at $30.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 214.71. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while PLNT trades at $94.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.49B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while LTH trades at $29.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 6.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while MAT trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while GOLF trades at $71.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while ELY trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while FUN trades at $38.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FUN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while SEAS trades at $50.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while PRKS trades at $49.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while SIX trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while YETI trades at $31.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while VSTO trades at $44.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while PTON trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while OSW trades at $19.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while MODG trades at $7.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while LUCK trades at $9.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -16.37. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUCK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while GEAR trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 301.34M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while XPOF trades at $8.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 279.02M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while FNKO trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -18.36. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 277.37M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while JOUT trades at $27.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while CNXA trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CNXA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 247.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while JAKK trades at $22.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 212.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while ESCA trades at $15.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 211.07M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while DOGZ trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -42.51. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 154.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while AOUT trades at $12.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -35.65. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 127.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while CLAR trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 110.85M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while PLBY trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PLBY's ROE of -14.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while BTN trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 43.79M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while ISPO trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.61M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while NLS trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.44M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while FGH trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 12.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while YYAI trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to YYAI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 9.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while FXLV trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 9.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while NWTG trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -8.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 8.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while GDHG trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 8.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while AGH trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -59.50. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 8.17M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while MMA trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MMA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 7.55M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while SRM trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SRM's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 7.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while HWH trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HWH's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891552.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while SPGC trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 128138.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.

HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 9.19B. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 6225.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $65.56, while BBIG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.64, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.