Hasbro, Inc.
Hasbro, Inc. HAS Peers
See (HAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAS | $73.82 | +0.94% | 10.3B | 24.36 | $3.03 | +3.80% |
| CCL | $28.12 | +3.15% | 36.5B | 14.71 | $1.91 | N/A |
| CUK | $25.51 | +2.99% | 32.8B | 13.36 | $1.91 | N/A |
| AS | $38.76 | -1.52% | 21.5B | 104.73 | $0.37 | N/A |
| PLNT | $109.05 | +0.32% | 9.1B | 51.71 | $2.11 | N/A |
| LTH | $30.33 | +0.93% | 6.7B | 31.59 | $0.96 | N/A |
| MAT | $19.72 | -0.40% | 6.4B | 12.81 | $1.54 | N/A |
| GOLF | $72.82 | -0.68% | 4.3B | 20.01 | $3.64 | +1.24% |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
| SEAS | $50.30 | +2.49% | 3.2B | 13.27 | $3.79 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HAS vs CCL Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while CCL trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs CUK Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while CUK trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs AS Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while AS trades at $38.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 104.73. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs PLNT Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while PLNT trades at $109.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 51.71. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs LTH Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while LTH trades at $30.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs MAT Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while MAT trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs GOLF Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while GOLF trades at $72.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs ELY Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs SEAS Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs FUN Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while FUN trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs SIX Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs PTON Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while PTON trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs YETI Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while YETI trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs VSTO Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs PRKS Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while PRKS trades at $47.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs OSW Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while OSW trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs MODG Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while MODG trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs LUCK Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while LUCK trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -130.29. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUCK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs GEAR Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs XPOF Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 363.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while XPOF trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs JOUT Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while JOUT trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs CNXA Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CNXA's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs FNKO Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while FNKO trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs JAKK Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 231.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while JAKK trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs DOGZ Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 208.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while DOGZ trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -42.05. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs ESCA Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while ESCA trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs PLBY Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while PLBY trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +286.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs SRM Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while SRM trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -32.29. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SRM's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs AOUT Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while AOUT trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -1045.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs CLAR Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while CLAR trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs BTN Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs ISPO Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while ISPO trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs ISPOW Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs NLS Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs FGH Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs MMA Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while MMA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MMA's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs YYAI Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while YYAI trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to YYAI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs HWH Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while HWH trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HWH's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs AGH Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while AGH trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -28.40. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs FXLV Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while FXLV trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs NWTG Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while NWTG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs GDHG Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while GDHG trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs SPGC Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs BBIG Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs DS-PD Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs DVD Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs DS-PC Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs DS-PB Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs DS Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.
HAS vs BWL-A Comparison
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $73.82, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.36, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.