Hasbro, Inc.
Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAS | $101.00 | +0.00% | 14.2B | -44.11 | -$2.30 | +2.77% |
| CCL | $31.55 | +0.00% | 44.2B | 15.84 | $2.02 | +0.47% |
| CUK | $31.42 | +0.00% | 41.8B | 15.76 | $2.02 | +0.47% |
| AS | $41.51 | +0.00% | 23.3B | 76.31 | $0.55 | N/A |
| PLNT | $91.13 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 37.15 | $2.44 | N/A |
| LTH | $28.85 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 22.62 | $1.28 | N/A |
| GOLF | $99.96 | -0.01% | 6B | 27.67 | $3.69 | +0.92% |
| MAT | $17.42 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 14.04 | $1.24 | N/A |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
| YETI | $47.06 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 24.83 | $1.92 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HAS vs CCL Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while CCL trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CCL's competition here
HAS vs CUK Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while CUK trades at $31.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CUK's competition here
HAS vs AS Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while AS trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 76.31. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check AS's competition here
HAS vs PLNT Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while PLNT trades at $91.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 37.15. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check PLNT's competition here
HAS vs LTH Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while LTH trades at $28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check LTH's competition here
HAS vs GOLF Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while GOLF trades at $99.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check GOLF's competition here
HAS vs MAT Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while MAT trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check MAT's competition here
HAS vs ELY Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ELY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ELY's competition here
HAS vs YETI Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while YETI trades at $47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check YETI's competition here
HAS vs SEAS Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check SEAS's competition here
HAS vs MODG Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while MODG trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check MODG's competition here
HAS vs SIX Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check SIX's competition here
HAS vs CALY Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CALY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while CALY trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas CALY's P/E ratio is 69.57. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CALY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CALY's competition here
HAS vs VSTO Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check VSTO's competition here
HAS vs OSW Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while OSW trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check OSW's competition here
HAS vs PRKS Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while PRKS trades at $35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check PRKS's competition here
HAS vs FUN Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while FUN trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FUN's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check FUN's competition here
HAS vs PTON Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while PTON trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -36.75. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check PTON's competition here
HAS vs LUCK Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while LUCK trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -13.02. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LUCK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check LUCK's competition here
HAS vs GEAR Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check GEAR's competition here
HAS vs JOUT Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 527.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while JOUT trades at $48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -23.06. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check JOUT's competition here
HAS vs HERE Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, HERE has a market cap of 455.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while HERE trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas HERE's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HERE's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to HERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check HERE's competition here
HAS vs XPOF Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while XPOF trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check XPOF's competition here
HAS vs FNKO Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while FNKO trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check FNKO's competition here
HAS vs CNXA Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CNXA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CNXA's competition here
HAS vs JAKK Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 253.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while JAKK trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check JAKK's competition here
HAS vs PLBY Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 197M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while PLBY trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +3.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check PLBY's competition here
HAS vs ESCA Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 194.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while ESCA trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ESCA's competition here
HAS vs SRM Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while SRM trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SRM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check SRM's competition here
HAS vs CLAR Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while CLAR trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check CLAR's competition here
HAS vs AOUT Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while AOUT trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -21.34. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check AOUT's competition here
HAS vs AGH Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while AGH trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -20.95. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check AGH's competition here
HAS vs NOMA Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NOMA has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while NOMA trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas NOMA's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NOMA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check NOMA's competition here
HAS vs ISPO Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while ISPO trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ISPO's competition here
HAS vs BTN Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check BTN's competition here
HAS vs TRON Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, TRON has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while TRON trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas TRON's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to TRON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to TRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check TRON's competition here
HAS vs KMRK Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, KMRK has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while KMRK trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas KMRK's P/E ratio is 68.33. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KMRK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to KMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check KMRK's competition here
HAS vs NLS Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check NLS's competition here
HAS vs FGH Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check FGH's competition here
HAS vs DOGZ Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while DOGZ trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DOGZ's competition here
HAS vs YYAI Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while YYAI trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to YYAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check YYAI's competition here
HAS vs HWH Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while HWH trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check HWH's competition here
HAS vs NWTG Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while NWTG trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check NWTG's competition here
HAS vs MMA Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while MMA trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MMA's ROE of -20.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check MMA's competition here
HAS vs GDHG Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while GDHG trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check GDHG's competition here
HAS vs FXLV Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while FXLV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check FXLV's competition here
HAS vs SPGC Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check SPGC's competition here
HAS vs ISPOW Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ISPOW's competition here
HAS vs BBIG Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 70.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check BBIG's competition here
HAS vs DS Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DS's competition here
HAS vs DS-PC Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DS-PC's competition here
HAS vs DVD Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DVD's competition here
HAS vs MYCC Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, MYCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while MYCC trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas MYCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MYCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to MYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check MYCC's competition here
HAS vs ILG Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ILG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while ILG trades at $34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas ILG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ILG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is more volatile compared to ILG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check ILG's competition here
HAS vs DS-PD Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DS-PD's competition here
HAS vs BWL-A Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check BWL-A's competition here
HAS vs DS-PB Comparison February 2026
HAS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAS stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAS is priced at $101.00, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.11, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAS's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HAS is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAS.Check DS-PB's competition here