HanMan Fit Ltd.
HanMan Fit Ltd. (HANMAN.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HANMAN.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HANMAN.BO | ₹4.70 | +0.00% | 45.2M | -14.83 | -₹0.29 | N/A |
| TIMEX.BO | ₹294.55 | +0.00% | 29.7B | 56.77 | ₹5.19 | N/A |
| UDAYJEW.BO | ₹123.05 | +0.00% | 3B | 14.79 | ₹8.42 | N/A |
| RADIXIND.BO | ₹185.70 | -4.40% | 2.8B | 81.45 | ₹2.28 | +0.27% |
| ITHL.BO | ₹343.95 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 12.98 | ₹26.10 | +1.62% |
| MINID.BO | ₹22.89 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 563.50 | ₹0.04 | N/A |
| GOLKUNDIA.BO | ₹294.90 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 17.26 | ₹17.45 | +0.50% |
| EY.BO | ₹971.00 | -2.02% | 1.9B | -28.91 | -₹33.59 | N/A |
| AGOL.BO | ₹5.05 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 10.29 | ₹0.49 | N/A |
| VJTFEDU.BO | ₹93.08 | +9.38% | 1.6B | -47.98 | -₹1.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HANMAN.BO vs TIMEX.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, TIMEX.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while TIMEX.BO trades at ₹294.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas TIMEX.BO's P/E ratio is 56.77. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TIMEX.BO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to TIMEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check TIMEX.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs UDAYJEW.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, UDAYJEW.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while UDAYJEW.BO trades at ₹123.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas UDAYJEW.BO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UDAYJEW.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to UDAYJEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check UDAYJEW.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs RADIXIND.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, RADIXIND.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while RADIXIND.BO trades at ₹185.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas RADIXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 81.45. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RADIXIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to RADIXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check RADIXIND.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs ITHL.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ITHL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while ITHL.BO trades at ₹343.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas ITHL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ITHL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to ITHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check ITHL.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs MINID.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, MINID.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while MINID.BO trades at ₹22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas MINID.BO's P/E ratio is 563.50. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MINID.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to MINID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check MINID.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs GOLKUNDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, GOLKUNDIA.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while GOLKUNDIA.BO trades at ₹294.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas GOLKUNDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GOLKUNDIA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to GOLKUNDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check GOLKUNDIA.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs EY.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, EY.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while EY.BO trades at ₹971.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas EY.BO's P/E ratio is -28.91. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EY.BO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to EY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check EY.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs AGOL.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AGOL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while AGOL.BO trades at ₹5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas AGOL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AGOL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to AGOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check AGOL.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs VJTFEDU.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, VJTFEDU.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while VJTFEDU.BO trades at ₹93.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas VJTFEDU.BO's P/E ratio is -47.98. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VJTFEDU.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to VJTFEDU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check VJTFEDU.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs NARBADA.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, NARBADA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while NARBADA.BO trades at ₹57.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas NARBADA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NARBADA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to NARBADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check NARBADA.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs PJL.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, PJL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while PJL.BO trades at ₹262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas PJL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PJL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and PJL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PJL.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs DEVLAB.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, DEVLAB.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while DEVLAB.BO trades at ₹93.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas DEVLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DEVLAB.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and DEVLAB.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DEVLAB.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs JETKINGQ.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, JETKINGQ.BO has a market cap of 814.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while JETKINGQ.BO trades at ₹136.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas JETKINGQ.BO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JETKINGQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to JETKINGQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check JETKINGQ.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs IRONWOOD.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, IRONWOOD.BO has a market cap of 763.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while IRONWOOD.BO trades at ₹48.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas IRONWOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IRONWOOD.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to IRONWOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check IRONWOOD.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs BOMBCYC.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, BOMBCYC.BO has a market cap of 694.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while BOMBCYC.BO trades at ₹1,741.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas BOMBCYC.BO's P/E ratio is -20.99. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BOMBCYC.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to BOMBCYC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check BOMBCYC.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SWARNSAR.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SWARNSAR.BO has a market cap of 689.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SWARNSAR.BO trades at ₹33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SWARNSAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SWARNSAR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to SWARNSAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check SWARNSAR.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs VSL.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, VSL.BO has a market cap of 671.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while VSL.BO trades at ₹8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas VSL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VSL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to VSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check VSL.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs BGJL.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, BGJL.BO has a market cap of 616.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while BGJL.BO trades at ₹41.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas BGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BGJL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to BGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check BGJL.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs EVANS.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, EVANS.BO has a market cap of 580.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while EVANS.BO trades at ₹105.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas EVANS.BO's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EVANS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to EVANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check EVANS.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SJCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SJCORP.BO has a market cap of 543.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SJCORP.BO trades at ₹65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SJCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 382.35. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SJCORP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to SJCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check SJCORP.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs MINALIND.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, MINALIND.BO has a market cap of 481.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while MINALIND.BO trades at ₹2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas MINALIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MINALIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to MINALIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check MINALIND.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs GROWINGTON.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, GROWINGTON.BO has a market cap of 481.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while GROWINGTON.BO trades at ₹0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas GROWINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GROWINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to GROWINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check GROWINGTON.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs KENVI.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, KENVI.BO has a market cap of 298.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while KENVI.BO trades at ₹2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas KENVI.BO's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KENVI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to KENVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check KENVI.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs EIGHTY.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, EIGHTY.BO has a market cap of 288.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while EIGHTY.BO trades at ₹28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas EIGHTY.BO's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EIGHTY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and EIGHTY.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EIGHTY.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs YAANENT.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, YAANENT.BO has a market cap of 266.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while YAANENT.BO trades at ₹86.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas YAANENT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to YAANENT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and YAANENT.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAANENT.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SHOORA.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SHOORA.BO has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SHOORA.BO trades at ₹55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SHOORA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SHOORA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to SHOORA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check SHOORA.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs VIRTUALG.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, VIRTUALG.BO has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while VIRTUALG.BO trades at ₹0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas VIRTUALG.BO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VIRTUALG.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to VIRTUALG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check VIRTUALG.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SMGOLD.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SMGOLD.BO has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SMGOLD.BO trades at ₹14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SMGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SMGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to SMGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check SMGOLD.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs OROSMITHS.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, OROSMITHS.BO has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while OROSMITHS.BO trades at ₹4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas OROSMITHS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OROSMITHS.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to OROSMITHS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check OROSMITHS.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs PALMJEWELS.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, PALMJEWELS.BO has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while PALMJEWELS.BO trades at ₹17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas PALMJEWELS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PALMJEWELS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to PALMJEWELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check PALMJEWELS.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SAGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SAGAR.BO has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SAGAR.BO trades at ₹13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SAGAR.BO's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SAGAR.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and SAGAR.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAGAR.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SKRABUL.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SKRABUL.BO has a market cap of 160.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SKRABUL.BO trades at ₹33.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SKRABUL.BO's P/E ratio is 399.00. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SKRABUL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to SKRABUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check SKRABUL.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs EASTRED.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, EASTRED.BO has a market cap of 157M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while EASTRED.BO trades at ₹29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas EASTRED.BO's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EASTRED.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to EASTRED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check EASTRED.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs GGL.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, GGL.BO has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while GGL.BO trades at ₹3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas GGL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.29. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GGL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to GGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check GGL.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SOVERDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SOVERDIA.BO has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SOVERDIA.BO trades at ₹24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SOVERDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SOVERDIA.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and SOVERDIA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOVERDIA.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs GOBLIN.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, GOBLIN.BO has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while GOBLIN.BO trades at ₹8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas GOBLIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GOBLIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO is less volatile compared to GOBLIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HANMAN.BO.Check GOBLIN.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SBRANDS.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SBRANDS.BO trades at ₹10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SBRANDS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and SBRANDS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBRANDS.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs SUNRAJDI.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SUNRAJDI.BO has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while SUNRAJDI.BO trades at ₹18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas SUNRAJDI.BO's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SUNRAJDI.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and SUNRAJDI.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUNRAJDI.BO's competition here
HANMAN.BO vs OLPCL.BO Comparison February 2026
HANMAN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HANMAN.BO stands at 45.2M. In comparison, OLPCL.BO has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HANMAN.BO is priced at ₹4.70, while OLPCL.BO trades at ₹3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HANMAN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -14.83, whereas OLPCL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, HANMAN.BO's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OLPCL.BO's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HANMAN.BO and OLPCL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OLPCL.BO's competition here