Silver Hammer Mining Corp.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HAMR.CN
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HAMR.CN
Silver Hammer Mining Corp. (HAMR.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HAMR.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAMR.CN | CA$0.08 | +0.00% | 5.4M | -7.50 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| PAAS.TO | CA$77.70 | +0.57% | 28.5B | 21.76 | CA$3.57 | +0.96% |
| AG.TO | CA$30.43 | -1.10% | 15B | 64.74 | CA$0.47 | +0.10% |
| DSV.TO | CA$9.63 | -1.93% | 7.8B | 45.86 | CA$0.21 | N/A |
| FVI.TO | CA$14.31 | -1.17% | 4.4B | 12.13 | CA$1.18 | N/A |
| MAG.TO | CA$34.38 | +2.90% | 3.6B | 25.28 | CA$1.36 | +2.13% |
| SVM.TO | CA$15.31 | -0.65% | 3.4B | -117.77 | -CA$0.13 | +0.23% |
| AYA.TO | CA$22.19 | -2.25% | 3.1B | 49.31 | CA$0.45 | N/A |
| FR.TO | CA$8.27 | +3.25% | 2.4B | -37.59 | -CA$0.22 | +0.10% |
| APM.TO | CA$6.85 | -5.52% | 1B | 6.34 | CA$1.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HAMR.CN vs PAAS.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, PAAS.TO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while PAAS.TO trades at CA$77.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas PAAS.TO's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PAAS.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is more volatile compared to PAAS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check PAAS.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs AG.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, AG.TO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while AG.TO trades at CA$30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas AG.TO's P/E ratio is 64.74. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to AG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check AG.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs DSV.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, DSV.TO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while DSV.TO trades at CA$9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas DSV.TO's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DSV.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to DSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check DSV.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs FVI.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, FVI.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while FVI.TO trades at CA$14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas FVI.TO's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FVI.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to FVI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check FVI.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs MAG.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MAG.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MAG.TO trades at CA$34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas MAG.TO's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MAG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is more volatile compared to MAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check MAG.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs SVM.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SVM.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while SVM.TO trades at CA$15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas SVM.TO's P/E ratio is -117.77. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SVM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to SVM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check SVM.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs AYA.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, AYA.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while AYA.TO trades at CA$22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas AYA.TO's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AYA.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to AYA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check AYA.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs FR.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, FR.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while FR.TO trades at CA$8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas FR.TO's P/E ratio is -37.59. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FR.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is more volatile compared to FR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check FR.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs APM.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, APM.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while APM.TO trades at CA$6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas APM.TO's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to APM.TO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to APM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check APM.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs HSLV.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, HSLV.TO has a market cap of 834.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while HSLV.TO trades at CA$8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas HSLV.TO's P/E ratio is -58.43. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HSLV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to HSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check HSLV.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs SVRS.V Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SVRS.V has a market cap of 351.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while SVRS.V trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas SVRS.V's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SVRS.V's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to SVRS.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check SVRS.V's competition here
HAMR.CN vs AGMR.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, AGMR.TO has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while AGMR.TO trades at CA$3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas AGMR.TO's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AGMR.TO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to AGMR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check AGMR.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs BIG.V Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, BIG.V has a market cap of 188M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BIG.V trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas BIG.V's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BIG.V's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is more volatile compared to BIG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check BIG.V's competition here
HAMR.CN vs KUYA.CN Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, KUYA.CN has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while KUYA.CN trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas KUYA.CN's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KUYA.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to KUYA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check KUYA.CN's competition here
HAMR.CN vs BNKR.CN Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, BNKR.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BNKR.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas BNKR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BNKR.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to BNKR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check BNKR.CN's competition here
HAMR.CN vs SBR.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SBR.TO has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while SBR.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas SBR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SBR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is more volatile compared to SBR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check SBR.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs MSV.TO Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MSV.TO has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while MSV.TO trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas MSV.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MSV.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is more volatile compared to MSV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check MSV.TO's competition here
HAMR.CN vs AMCO.V Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, AMCO.V has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while AMCO.V trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas AMCO.V's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMCO.V's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to AMCO.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check AMCO.V's competition here
HAMR.CN vs CSS.CN Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, CSS.CN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while CSS.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas CSS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CSS.CN's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is more volatile compared to CSS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check CSS.CN's competition here
HAMR.CN vs KTRI.V Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, KTRI.V has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while KTRI.V trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas KTRI.V's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KTRI.V's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to KTRI.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check KTRI.V's competition here
HAMR.CN vs BNKR.V Comparison April 2026
HAMR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAMR.CN stands at 5.4M. In comparison, BNKR.V has a market cap of 129.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HAMR.CN is priced at CA$0.08, while BNKR.V trades at CA$5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAMR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.50, whereas BNKR.V's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, HAMR.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BNKR.V's ROE of +4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAMR.CN is less volatile compared to BNKR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAMR.CN.Check BNKR.V's competition here