HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See H4ZT.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for H4ZT.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H4ZT.DE | €35.33 | -0.44% | 158.9M | N/A | N/A | +5.74% |
| WTIF.SG | €55.13 | +0.95% | 180.4B | 83.62 | €0.66 | N/A |
| ZPDW.DE | €108.74 | +0.95% | 168.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | €704.60 | +0.60% | 131.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | €125.31 | +0.69% | 124.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWLE.DE | €10.56 | +1.68% | 119.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| U1FB.DE | €34.46 | +1.09% | 119.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VGWL.DE | €159.14 | +0.52% | 76.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.26% |
| VUAA.DE | €126.33 | +0.59% | 74.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.DE | €123.97 | +0.62% | 74.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged Acc (STU: WTIF.SG)
H4ZT.DE vs WTIF.SG Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, WTIF.SG has a market cap of 180.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while WTIF.SG trades at €55.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTIF.SG's P/E ratio is 83.62. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to WTIF.SG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to WTIF.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check WTIF.SG's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (XETRA: ZPDW.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 168.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while ZPDW.DE trades at €108.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (XETRA: SXR8.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 131.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SXR8.DE trades at €704.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: EUNL.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EUNL.DE trades at €125.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: IWLE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IWLE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IWLE.DE trades at €10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
UBS MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF hEUR acc (XETRA: U1FB.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs U1FB.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while U1FB.DE trades at €34.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check U1FB.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (XETRA: VGWL.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VGWL.DE trades at €159.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (XETRA: VUAA.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VUAA.DE trades at €126.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (XETRA: VUSA.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VUSA.DE trades at €123.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (XETRA: VWCE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VWCE.DE trades at €164.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (XETRA: P500.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs P500.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while P500.DE trades at €13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check P500.DE's competition here
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (XETRA: E500.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs E500.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while E500.DE trades at €56.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check E500.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (XETRA: IBC3.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IBC3.DE trades at €6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (XETRA: SPY5.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SPY5.DE trades at €653.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (XETRA: LYP2.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while LYP2.DE trades at €358.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XETRA: XDWL.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XDWL.DE trades at €113.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XDWD.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XDWD.DE trades at €137.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: EDMU.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EDMU.DE trades at €11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: OM3L.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while OM3L.DE trades at €11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (XETRA: IUSQ.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IUSQ.DE trades at €105.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: CBUC.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs CBUC.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while CBUC.DE trades at €7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs NQSE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while NQSE.DE trades at €16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check NQSE.DE's competition here
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (XETRA: IUSA.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IUSA.DE trades at €65.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: IUSZ.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IUSZ.DE trades at €12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: SPPW.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SPPW.DE trades at €45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XETRA: QDVE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while QDVE.DE trades at €42.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: EQQQ.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EQQQ.DE trades at €608.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI All Country World EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: SPP1.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SPP1.DE trades at €26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: SPYY.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SPYY.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SPYY.DE has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SPYY.DE trades at €279.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPYY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SPYY.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SPYY.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (XETRA: EUNK.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EUNK.DE trades at €104.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF (XETRA: SGAS.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SGAS.DE trades at €13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
Amundi Core Stoxx Europe 600 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (XETRA: STXH.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while STXH.DE trades at €166.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check STXH.DE's competition here
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF (XETRA: JUHE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs JUHE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while JUHE.DE trades at €58.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF (XETRA: JREU.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while JREU.DE trades at €65.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check JREU.DE's competition here
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF (XETRA: JRUD.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs JRUD.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while JRUD.DE trades at €60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XDEW.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XDEW.DE trades at €104.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
Deka MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XETRA: EL44.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EL44.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EL44.DE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EL44.DE trades at €13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EL44.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EL44.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EL44.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EL44.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 2C - EUR Hedged (XETRA: XD9E.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XD9E.DE trades at €148.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XD9U.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XD9U.DE trades at €193.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: DBXW.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while DBXW.DE trades at €134.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XMME.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XMME.DE trades at €78.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XMME.DE's competition here
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ET (XETRA: H4ZJ.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (STU: H4ZJ.SG)
H4ZT.DE vs H4ZJ.SG Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, H4ZJ.SG has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while H4ZJ.SG trades at €42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZJ.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.SG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check H4ZJ.SG's competition here
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (XETRA: VGVF.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VGVF.DE trades at €130.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (XETRA: VGVE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VGVE.DE trades at €123.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VGVE.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (XETRA: IQQY.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IQQY.DE trades at €40.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
Amundi MSCI World Swap II UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: LYYA.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while LYYA.DE trades at €422.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (DE) (XETRA: EXIE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EXIE.DE trades at €7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (DE) (XETRA: EXSA.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EXSA.DE trades at €64.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (XETRA: IQQE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IQQE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IQQE.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IQQE.DE trades at €55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to IQQE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IQQE.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (XETRA: EUNM.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EUNM.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EUNM.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EUNM.DE trades at €53.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to EUNM.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EUNM.DE's competition here
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (XETRA: UIMI.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs UIMI.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, UIMI.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while UIMI.DE trades at €143.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIMI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to UIMI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to UIMI.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check UIMI.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF (XETRA: 2B7K.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while 2B7K.DE trades at €13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF (XETRA: 2B7J.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs 2B7J.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while 2B7J.DE trades at €10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: EDM2.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EDM2.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EDM2.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EDM2.DE trades at €7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDM2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EDM2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to EDM2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EDM2.DE's competition here
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (XETRA: EXW1.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EXW1.DE trades at €63.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR Dist (XETRA: AEMD.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs AEMD.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, AEMD.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while AEMD.DE trades at €72.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEMD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to AEMD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to AEMD.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check AEMD.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1D (XETRA: XIEE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XIEE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XIEE.DE trades at €92.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XIEE.DE's competition here
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF (XETRA: JREG.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs JREG.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, JREG.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while JREG.DE trades at €58.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to JREG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to JREG.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check JREG.DE's competition here
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZF.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while H4ZF.DE trades at €66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here
iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: IBCF.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IBCF.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IBCF.DE trades at €153.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IBCF.DE's competition here
iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (XETRA: EXS1.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EXS1.DE trades at €206.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (XETRA: CEBL.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs CEBL.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, CEBL.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while CEBL.DE trades at €250.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEBL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to CEBL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to CEBL.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check CEBL.DE's competition here
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: D5BM.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while D5BM.DE trades at €132.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 5C EUR Hedged (XETRA: XS5E.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XS5E.DE trades at €10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: IQQW.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IQQW.DE trades at €89.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IQQW.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XZMU.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XZMU.DE trades at €69.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (XETRA: SXRT.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SXRT.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SXRT.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SXRT.DE trades at €244.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRT.DE's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRT.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SXRT.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SXRT.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Distributing (XETRA: VUKE.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VUKE.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VUKE.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VUKE.DE trades at €54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUKE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VUKE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VUKE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VUKE.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Distributing (XETRA: VGEU.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VGEU.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VGEU.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VGEU.DE trades at €49.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGEU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGEU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VGEU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VGEU.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (XETRA: IUSN.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs IUSN.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, IUSN.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while IUSN.DE trades at €9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to IUSN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check IUSN.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (XETRA: VWCG.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs VWCG.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, VWCG.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while VWCG.DE trades at €59.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCG.DE's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VWCG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to VWCG.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check VWCG.DE's competition here
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: SC0J.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SC0J.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SC0J.DE trades at €134.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SC0J.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI Europe CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: EDM6.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EDM6.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EDM6.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EDM6.DE trades at €9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDM6.DE's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EDM6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EDM6.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EDM6.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI Europe CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: EMNU.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EMNU.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EMNU.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EMNU.DE trades at €8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EMNU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EMNU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EMNU.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: 10AI.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs 10AI.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, 10AI.DE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while 10AI.DE trades at €82.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AI.DE's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 10AI.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to 10AI.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check 10AI.DE's competition here
Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: NADQ.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs NADQ.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, NADQ.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while NADQ.DE trades at €263.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADQ.DE's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to NADQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to NADQ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check NADQ.DE's competition here
Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (XETRA: LYMS.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs LYMS.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, LYMS.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while LYMS.DE trades at €101.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYMS.DE's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to LYMS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to LYMS.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check LYMS.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XETRA: XMK9.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XMK9.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XMK9.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XMK9.DE trades at €60.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMK9.DE's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XMK9.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XMK9.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XMK9.DE's competition here
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: DBXD.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while DBXD.DE trades at €234.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check DBXD.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: DBXJ.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs DBXJ.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, DBXJ.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while DBXJ.DE trades at €101.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXJ.DE's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to DBXJ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check DBXJ.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF (XETRA: OM3Y.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs OM3Y.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, OM3Y.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while OM3Y.DE trades at €7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3Y.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3Y.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to OM3Y.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check OM3Y.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF (XETRA: AYEM.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs AYEM.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, AYEM.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while AYEM.DE trades at €8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to AYEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is less volatile compared to AYEM.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check AYEM.DE's competition here
Amundi MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF EUR Acc (XETRA: AMEW.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs AMEW.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, AMEW.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while AMEW.DE trades at €681.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMEW.DE's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to AMEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to AMEW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check AMEW.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (XETRA: EUNN.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs EUNN.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, EUNN.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while EUNN.DE trades at €69.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to EUNN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check EUNN.DE's competition here
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (XETRA: H1D5.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs H1D5.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while H1D5.DE trades at €175.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check H1D5.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: AHYQ.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs AHYQ.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, AHYQ.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while AHYQ.DE trades at €119.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHYQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to AHYQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to AHYQ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check AHYQ.DE's competition here
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc (XETRA: UETW.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs UETW.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, UETW.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while UETW.DE trades at €39.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UETW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to UETW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to UETW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check UETW.DE's competition here
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD dis (XETRA: UBU7.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs UBU7.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, UBU7.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while UBU7.DE trades at €106.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBU7.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to UBU7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to UBU7.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check UBU7.DE's competition here
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (STU: D500.SG)
H4ZT.DE vs D500.SG Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, D500.SG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while D500.SG trades at €60.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to D500.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to D500.SG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check D500.SG's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI All Country World Investable Market UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: SPYI.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SPYI.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SPYI.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SPYI.DE trades at €11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPYI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SPYI.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SPYI.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (XETRA: SXR7.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SXR7.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SXR7.DE trades at €243.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
UBS MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF USD dis (XETRA: UIMM.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs UIMM.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, UIMM.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while UIMM.DE trades at €176.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIMM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to UIMM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to UIMM.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check UIMM.DE's competition here
UBS MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF USD acc (XETRA: SEAC.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SEAC.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SEAC.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SEAC.DE trades at €35.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SEAC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SEAC.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SEAC.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: NADA.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs NADA.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, NADA.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while NADA.DE trades at €87.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to NADA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to NADA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check NADA.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (XETRA: LCUJ.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs LCUJ.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, LCUJ.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while LCUJ.DE trades at €22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to LCUJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to LCUJ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check LCUJ.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XZW0.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XZW0.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XZW0.DE trades at €47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XZW0.DE's competition here
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XETRA: SC0H.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs SC0H.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, SC0H.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while SC0H.DE trades at €192.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0H.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SC0H.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to SC0H.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check SC0H.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI AC World Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XMAW.DE)
H4ZT.DE vs XMAW.DE Comparison July 2026
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZT.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H4ZT.DE stands at 158.9M. In comparison, XMAW.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, H4ZT.DE is priced at €35.33 on the XETRA, while XMAW.DE trades at €49.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H4ZT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMAW.DE's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, H4ZT.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XMAW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H4ZT.DE is more volatile compared to XMAW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H4ZT.DE.Check XMAW.DE's competition here