iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See NQSE.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for NQSE.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NQSE.DE | €17.22 | +0.60% | 23.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WTIF.SG | €54.88 | +1.25% | 179.6B | 83.27 | €0.66 | N/A |
| ZPDW.DE | €108.94 | +1.44% | 169.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | €722.42 | +0.34% | 135.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | €128.24 | +0.35% | 128B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWLE.DE | €10.94 | -0.06% | 124.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.05% |
| U1FB.DE | €34.73 | +1.59% | 120.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VGWL.DE | €162.78 | +0.31% | 77.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.23% |
| VUSA.DE | €127.13 | +0.32% | 76.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.85% |
| VUAA.DE | €129.54 | +0.31% | 76B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged Acc (STU: WTIF.SG)
NQSE.DE vs WTIF.SG Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, WTIF.SG has a market cap of 179.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while WTIF.SG trades at €54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTIF.SG's P/E ratio is 83.27. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTIF.SG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to WTIF.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check WTIF.SG's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (XETRA: ZPDW.DE)
NQSE.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 169.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while ZPDW.DE trades at €108.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (XETRA: SXR8.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SXR8.DE trades at €722.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: EUNL.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EUNL.DE trades at €128.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: IWLE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IWLE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IWLE.DE trades at €10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
UBS MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF hEUR acc (XETRA: U1FB.DE)
NQSE.DE vs U1FB.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while U1FB.DE trades at €34.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check U1FB.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (XETRA: VGWL.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VGWL.DE trades at €162.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (XETRA: VUSA.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VUSA.DE trades at €127.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (XETRA: VUAA.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VUAA.DE trades at €129.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (XETRA: VWCE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VWCE.DE trades at €168.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (XETRA: E500.DE)
NQSE.DE vs E500.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while E500.DE trades at €58.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check E500.DE's competition here
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (XETRA: P500.DE)
NQSE.DE vs P500.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while P500.DE trades at €13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check P500.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (XETRA: IBC3.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IBC3.DE trades at €6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (XETRA: SPY5.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SPY5.DE trades at €670.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (XETRA: LYP2.DE)
NQSE.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while LYP2.DE trades at €373.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XDWD.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XDWD.DE trades at €140.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XETRA: XDWL.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XDWL.DE trades at €116.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: EDMU.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EDMU.DE trades at €12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: OM3L.DE)
NQSE.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while OM3L.DE trades at €11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: CBUC.DE)
NQSE.DE vs CBUC.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while CBUC.DE trades at €7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (XETRA: IUSQ.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IUSQ.DE trades at €107.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (XETRA: IUSA.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IUSA.DE trades at €66.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XETRA: QDVE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while QDVE.DE trades at €44.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: IUSZ.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IUSZ.DE trades at €12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: SPPW.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SPPW.DE trades at €46.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: EQQQ.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EQQQ.DE trades at €629.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI All Country World EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: SPP1.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SPP1.DE trades at €27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: SPYY.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SPYY.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SPYY.DE has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SPYY.DE trades at €286.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPYY.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SPYY.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SPYY.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF (XETRA: SGAS.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SGAS.DE trades at €13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
Amundi Core Stoxx Europe 600 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (XETRA: STXH.DE)
NQSE.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while STXH.DE trades at €170.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check STXH.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (XETRA: EUNK.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EUNK.DE trades at €106.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF (XETRA: JUHE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs JUHE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while JUHE.DE trades at €60.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF (XETRA: JREU.DE)
NQSE.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while JREU.DE trades at €67.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check JREU.DE's competition here
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF (XETRA: JRUD.DE)
NQSE.DE vs JRUD.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while JRUD.DE trades at €62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XDEW.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XDEW.DE trades at €105.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
Deka MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XETRA: EL44.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EL44.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EL44.DE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EL44.DE trades at €13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EL44.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EL44.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to EL44.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EL44.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XMME.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XMME.DE trades at €79.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XMME.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 2C - EUR Hedged (XETRA: XD9E.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XD9E.DE trades at €153.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: DBXW.DE)
NQSE.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while DBXW.DE trades at €137.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XD9U.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XD9U.DE trades at €198.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ET (XETRA: H4ZJ.DE)
NQSE.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (STU: H4ZJ.SG)
NQSE.DE vs H4ZJ.SG Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, H4ZJ.SG has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while H4ZJ.SG trades at €43.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.SG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check H4ZJ.SG's competition here
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (XETRA: VGVF.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VGVF.DE trades at €133.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (XETRA: VGVE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VGVE.DE trades at €126.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VGVE.DE's competition here
Amundi MSCI World Swap II UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: LYYA.DE)
NQSE.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while LYYA.DE trades at €431.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (XETRA: IQQY.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IQQY.DE trades at €41.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (XETRA: IQQE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IQQE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IQQE.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IQQE.DE trades at €57.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to IQQE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IQQE.DE's competition here
iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (DE) (XETRA: EXIE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EXIE.DE trades at €7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (DE) (XETRA: EXSA.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EXSA.DE trades at €65.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (XETRA: UIMI.DE)
NQSE.DE vs UIMI.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, UIMI.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while UIMI.DE trades at €145.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIMI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIMI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to UIMI.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check UIMI.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (XETRA: EUNM.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EUNM.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EUNM.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EUNM.DE trades at €55.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to EUNM.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EUNM.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF (XETRA: 2B7K.DE)
NQSE.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while 2B7K.DE trades at €13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF (XETRA: 2B7J.DE)
NQSE.DE vs 2B7J.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while 2B7J.DE trades at €10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (XETRA: EXW1.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EXW1.DE trades at €65.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR Dist (XETRA: AEMD.DE)
NQSE.DE vs AEMD.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, AEMD.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while AEMD.DE trades at €73.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEMD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEMD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to AEMD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check AEMD.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: EDM2.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EDM2.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EDM2.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EDM2.DE trades at €8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDM2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDM2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to EDM2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EDM2.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1D (XETRA: XIEE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XIEE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XIEE.DE trades at €94.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XIEE.DE's competition here
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF (XETRA: JREG.DE)
NQSE.DE vs JREG.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, JREG.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while JREG.DE trades at €59.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to JREG.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check JREG.DE's competition here
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (XETRA: H4ZF.DE)
NQSE.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while H4ZF.DE trades at €67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (XETRA: CEBL.DE)
NQSE.DE vs CEBL.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, CEBL.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while CEBL.DE trades at €255.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEBL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEBL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to CEBL.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check CEBL.DE's competition here
iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: IBCF.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IBCF.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IBCF.DE trades at €159.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IBCF.DE's competition here
iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (XETRA: EXS1.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EXS1.DE trades at €215.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 5C EUR Hedged (XETRA: XS5E.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XS5E.DE trades at €11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: D5BM.DE)
NQSE.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while D5BM.DE trades at €135.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XZMU.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XZMU.DE trades at €72.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: IQQW.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IQQW.DE trades at €92.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IQQW.DE's competition here
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (XETRA: SXRT.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SXRT.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SXRT.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SXRT.DE trades at €252.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRT.DE's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRT.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SXRT.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SXRT.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Distributing (XETRA: VUKE.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VUKE.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VUKE.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VUKE.DE trades at €55.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUKE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUKE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to VUKE.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VUKE.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (XETRA: IUSN.DE)
NQSE.DE vs IUSN.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, IUSN.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while IUSN.DE trades at €9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSN.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to IUSN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check IUSN.DE's competition here
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (XETRA: SC0J.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SC0J.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SC0J.DE trades at €137.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SC0J.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (XETRA: VWCG.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VWCG.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VWCG.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VWCG.DE trades at €61.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCG.DE's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to VWCG.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VWCG.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI Europe CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: EDM6.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EDM6.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EDM6.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EDM6.DE trades at €9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDM6.DE's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDM6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to EDM6.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EDM6.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI Europe CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF (XETRA: EMNU.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EMNU.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EMNU.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EMNU.DE trades at €8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to EMNU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EMNU.DE's competition here
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Distributing (XETRA: VGEU.DE)
NQSE.DE vs VGEU.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, VGEU.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while VGEU.DE trades at €50.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGEU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGEU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to VGEU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check VGEU.DE's competition here
Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: NADQ.DE)
NQSE.DE vs NADQ.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, NADQ.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while NADQ.DE trades at €271.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADQ.DE's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NADQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to NADQ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check NADQ.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: 10AI.DE)
NQSE.DE vs 10AI.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, 10AI.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while 10AI.DE trades at €84.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AI.DE's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 10AI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to 10AI.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check 10AI.DE's competition here
Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (XETRA: LYMS.DE)
NQSE.DE vs LYMS.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, LYMS.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while LYMS.DE trades at €104.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYMS.DE's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYMS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to LYMS.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check LYMS.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: DBXJ.DE)
NQSE.DE vs DBXJ.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, DBXJ.DE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while DBXJ.DE trades at €103.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXJ.DE's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to DBXJ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check DBXJ.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XETRA: XMK9.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XMK9.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XMK9.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XMK9.DE trades at €60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMK9.DE's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMK9.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to XMK9.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XMK9.DE's competition here
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: DBXD.DE)
NQSE.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while DBXD.DE trades at €243.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check DBXD.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF (XETRA: OM3Y.DE)
NQSE.DE vs OM3Y.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, OM3Y.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while OM3Y.DE trades at €7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3Y.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3Y.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to OM3Y.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check OM3Y.DE's competition here
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF (XETRA: AYEM.DE)
NQSE.DE vs AYEM.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, AYEM.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while AYEM.DE trades at €8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AYEM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to AYEM.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check AYEM.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (XETRA: EUNN.DE)
NQSE.DE vs EUNN.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, EUNN.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while EUNN.DE trades at €71.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to EUNN.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check EUNN.DE's competition here
Amundi MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF EUR Acc (XETRA: AMEW.DE)
NQSE.DE vs AMEW.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, AMEW.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while AMEW.DE trades at €697.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMEW.DE's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to AMEW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check AMEW.DE's competition here
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (XETRA: H1D5.DE)
NQSE.DE vs H1D5.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while H1D5.DE trades at €182.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check H1D5.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: AHYQ.DE)
NQSE.DE vs AHYQ.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, AHYQ.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while AHYQ.DE trades at €122.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHYQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AHYQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to AHYQ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check AHYQ.DE's competition here
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc (XETRA: UETW.DE)
NQSE.DE vs UETW.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, UETW.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while UETW.DE trades at €39.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UETW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UETW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to UETW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check UETW.DE's competition here
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (STU: D500.SG)
NQSE.DE vs D500.SG Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, D500.SG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while D500.SG trades at €62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to D500.SG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check D500.SG's competition here
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD dis (XETRA: UBU7.DE)
NQSE.DE vs UBU7.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, UBU7.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while UBU7.DE trades at €108.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBU7.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBU7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to UBU7.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check UBU7.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR MSCI All Country World Investable Market UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: SPYI.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SPYI.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SPYI.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SPYI.DE trades at €11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPYI.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SPYI.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SPYI.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XZW0.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XZW0.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XZW0.DE trades at €49.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XZW0.DE's competition here
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (XETRA: SXR7.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SXR7.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SXR7.DE trades at €250.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
UBS MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF USD dis (XETRA: UIMM.DE)
NQSE.DE vs UIMM.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, UIMM.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while UIMM.DE trades at €181.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIMM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIMM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to UIMM.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check UIMM.DE's competition here
UBS MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF USD acc (XETRA: SEAC.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SEAC.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SEAC.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SEAC.DE trades at €36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEAC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SEAC.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SEAC.DE's competition here
Xtrackers MSCI AC World Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XETRA: XMAW.DE)
NQSE.DE vs XMAW.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, XMAW.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while XMAW.DE trades at €50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMAW.DE's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMAW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to XMAW.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check XMAW.DE's competition here
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XETRA: SC0H.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SC0H.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SC0H.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SC0H.DE trades at €197.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0H.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0H.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SC0H.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SC0H.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Dist (XETRA: NADA.DE)
NQSE.DE vs NADA.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, NADA.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while NADA.DE trades at €89.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NADA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to NADA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check NADA.DE's competition here
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (XETRA: LCUJ.DE)
NQSE.DE vs LCUJ.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, LCUJ.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while LCUJ.DE trades at €22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUJ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is less volatile compared to LCUJ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check LCUJ.DE's competition here
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Leaders UCITS ETF (Acc) (XETRA: SPPY.DE)
NQSE.DE vs SPPY.DE Comparison August 2026
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XETRA: NQSE.DE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NQSE.DE stands at 23.8B. In comparison, SPPY.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NQSE.DE is priced at €17.22 on the XETRA, while SPPY.DE trades at €49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NQSE.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NQSE.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPY.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NQSE.DE is more volatile compared to SPPY.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NQSE.DE.Check SPPY.DE's competition here