Hyperscale Data, Inc.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GPUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPUS | $0.54 | -7.93% | 12.1M | -0.02 | -$28.33 | N/A |
| GE | $266.61 | +0.03% | 282.7B | 38.04 | $7.01 | +0.48% |
| RTX | $156.27 | +0.02% | 209.1B | 34.34 | $4.55 | +1.67% |
| BA | $226.87 | -1.41% | 171.6B | -13.71 | -$16.55 | N/A |
| LMT | $447.72 | +0.34% | 104.5B | 25.14 | $17.80 | +2.91% |
| GD | $319.89 | +0.09% | 86B | 21.48 | $14.89 | +1.82% |
| NOC | $586.74 | -0.96% | 84B | 21.67 | $27.07 | +1.44% |
| TDG | $1,389.98 | -1.31% | 78.3B | 46.07 | $30.14 | +5.40% |
| AXON | $763.52 | -0.35% | 59.9B | 188.06 | $4.06 | N/A |
| LHX | $276.17 | +0.15% | 51.7B | 30.84 | $8.96 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
GPUS vs GE Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 282.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while GE trades at $266.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check GE's competition here
GPUS vs RTX Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 209.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while RTX trades at $156.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check RTX's competition here
GPUS vs BA Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 171.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while BA trades at $226.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BA's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BA's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check BA's competition here
GPUS vs LMT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LMT has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while LMT trades at $447.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LMT's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LMT's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to LMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check LMT's competition here
GPUS vs GD Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while GD trades at $319.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check GD's competition here
GPUS vs NOC Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while NOC trades at $586.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check NOC's competition here
GPUS vs TDG Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while TDG trades at $1,389.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check TDG's competition here
GPUS vs AXON Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while AXON trades at $763.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 188.06. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check AXON's competition here
GPUS vs LHX Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while LHX trades at $276.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check LHX's competition here
GPUS vs HEI-A Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while HEI-A trades at $239.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 56.02. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check HEI-A's competition here
GPUS vs HEI Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while HEI trades at $305.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 71.50. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check HEI's competition here
GPUS vs RKLB Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while RKLB trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -102.64. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check RKLB's competition here
GPUS vs ESLT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while ESLT trades at $458.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 51.89. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check ESLT's competition here
GPUS vs CW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while CW trades at $478.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check CW's competition here
GPUS vs BWXT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while BWXT trades at $162.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 50.74. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check BWXT's competition here
GPUS vs WWD Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while WWD trades at $246.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check WWD's competition here
GPUS vs TXT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while TXT trades at $80.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check TXT's competition here
GPUS vs AVAV Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while AVAV trades at $241.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is 154.58. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AVAV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check AVAV's competition here
GPUS vs KTOS Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while KTOS trades at $66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 669.00. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check KTOS's competition here
GPUS vs DRS Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while DRS trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 43.65. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check DRS's competition here
GPUS vs HII Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while HII trades at $270.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check HII's competition here
GPUS vs ERJ Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while ERJ trades at $55.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check ERJ's competition here
GPUS vs SARO Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while SARO trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 67.27. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check SARO's competition here
GPUS vs CAE Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while CAE trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check CAE's competition here
GPUS vs KRMN Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while KRMN trades at $53.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 883.92. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check KRMN's competition here
GPUS vs LOAR Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while LOAR trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 154.13. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check LOAR's competition here
GPUS vs FLY Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while FLY trades at $44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to FLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check FLY's competition here
GPUS vs MOG-A Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while MOG-A trades at $197.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check MOG-A's competition here
GPUS vs ACHR Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while ACHR trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check ACHR's competition here
GPUS vs MOG-B Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while MOG-B trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check MOG-B's competition here
GPUS vs ACHR-WT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while ACHR-WT trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check ACHR-WT's competition here
GPUS vs HXL Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while HXL trades at $62.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 57.77. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check HXL's competition here
GPUS vs SPR Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while SPR trades at $40.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check SPR's competition here
GPUS vs AJRD Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check AJRD's competition here
GPUS vs MRCY Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while MRCY trades at $67.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -104.58. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check MRCY's competition here
GPUS vs VSEC Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while VSEC trades at $165.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 49.16. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check VSEC's competition here
GPUS vs POWWP Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while POWWP trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 83.44. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check POWWP's competition here
GPUS vs AIR Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while AIR trades at $75.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is 214.37. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check AIR's competition here
GPUS vs PL Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while PL trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -19.61. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check PL's competition here
GPUS vs TGI Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while TGI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check TGI's competition here
GPUS vs PL-WT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while PL-WT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check PL-WT's competition here
GPUS vs VVX Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while VVX trades at $57.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check VVX's competition here
GPUS vs LUNR Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while LUNR trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check LUNR's competition here
GPUS vs DCO Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while DCO trades at $93.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check DCO's competition here
GPUS vs KAMN Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check KAMN's competition here
GPUS vs ATRO Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while ATRO trades at $36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -331.18. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check ATRO's competition here
GPUS vs RDW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while RDW trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to RDW's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check RDW's competition here
GPUS vs EVEX-WT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check EVEX-WT's competition here
GPUS vs CDRE Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while CDRE trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check CDRE's competition here
GPUS vs EVEX Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while EVEX trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check EVEX's competition here
GPUS vs VEC Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check VEC's competition here
GPUS vs SKYH Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 811.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while SKYH trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check SKYH's competition here
GPUS vs NPK Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 767.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while NPK trades at $107.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check NPK's competition here
GPUS vs EH Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 616.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while EH trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -36.31. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check EH's competition here
GPUS vs RGR Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 565M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while RGR trades at $34.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 105.94. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check RGR's competition here
GPUS vs EVTL Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 496.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while EVTL trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check EVTL's competition here
GPUS vs BYRN Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 477.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while BYRN trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to BYRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check BYRN's competition here
GPUS vs TATT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 468.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while TATT trades at $36.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check TATT's competition here
GPUS vs PKE Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while PKE trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 55.65. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check PKE's competition here
GPUS vs SWBI Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 362.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while SWBI trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check SWBI's competition here
GPUS vs AZ Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AZ has a market cap of 335.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while AZ trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AZ's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AZ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to AZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check AZ's competition here
GPUS vs ISSC Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 233.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while ISSC trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check ISSC's competition here
GPUS vs SPCE Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while SPCE trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check SPCE's competition here
GPUS vs POWW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while POWW trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check POWW's competition here
GPUS vs IVAC Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check IVAC's competition here
GPUS vs CODA Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while CODA trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check CODA's competition here
GPUS vs HOVRW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while HOVRW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check HOVRW's competition here
GPUS vs OPXS Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while OPXS trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check OPXS's competition here
GPUS vs VTSI Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while VTSI trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 58.80. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to VTSI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check VTSI's competition here
GPUS vs HOVR Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while HOVR trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check HOVR's competition here
GPUS vs SKYH-WT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while SKYH-WT trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check SKYH-WT's competition here
GPUS vs LLAP Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check LLAP's competition here
GPUS vs LLAP-WT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check LLAP-WT's competition here
GPUS vs SIF Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while SIF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is -22.32. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check SIF's competition here
GPUS vs LILM Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LILM's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check LILM's competition here
GPUS vs KITT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while KITT trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to KITT's ROE of +9.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check KITT's competition here
GPUS vs CVU Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while CVU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to CVU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check CVU's competition here
GPUS vs KITTW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while KITTW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +9.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check KITTW's competition here
GPUS vs SIDU Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while SIDU trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check SIDU's competition here
GPUS vs XTIA Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while XTIA trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check XTIA's competition here
GPUS vs PRZO Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while PRZO trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -7.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check PRZO's competition here
GPUS vs DPRO Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while DPRO trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check DPRO's competition here
GPUS vs MNTS Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while MNTS trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check MNTS's competition here
GPUS vs ASTR Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while ASTR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ASTR's ROE of -51.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check ASTR's competition here
GPUS vs AIRI Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while AIRI trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check AIRI's competition here
GPUS vs AULT Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while AULT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to AULT's ROE of -11.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check AULT's competition here
GPUS vs ASTC Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while ASTC trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check ASTC's competition here
GPUS vs KWESW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while KWESW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check KWESW's competition here
GPUS vs KWE Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while KWE trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to KWE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check KWE's competition here
GPUS vs MNTSW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MNTSW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while MNTSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MNTSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to MNTSW's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to MNTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check MNTSW's competition here
GPUS vs LILMW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while LILMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to LILMW's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check LILMW's competition here
GPUS vs VORBW Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, VORBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while VORBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VORBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to VORBW's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to VORBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check VORBW's competition here
GPUS vs RADA Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, RADA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while RADA trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RADA's P/E ratio is 89.73. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to RADA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is more volatile compared to RADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check RADA's competition here
GPUS vs NILE Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, NILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while NILE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NILE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to NILE's ROE of +22.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to NILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check NILE's competition here
GPUS vs VORB Comparison August 2025
GPUS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPUS stands at 12.1M. In comparison, VORB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPUS is priced at $0.54, while VORB trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPUS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VORB's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GPUS's ROE is -8.50%, compared to VORB's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GPUS is less volatile compared to VORB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPUS.Check VORB's competition here