Great Panther Mining Limited
Great Panther Mining Limited GPL Peers
See (GPL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPL | $0.19 | -7.84% | 0 | -1.38 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| AEM | $117.91 | +1.38% | 59.6B | 25.09 | $4.70 | +1.36% |
| NEM | $52.85 | +0.27% | 58.8B | 12.04 | $4.39 | +2.37% |
| WPM | $86.18 | +0.77% | 39.1B | 63.37 | $1.36 | +0.73% |
| GOLD | $19.03 | +0.69% | 32.7B | 15.60 | $1.22 | +2.11% |
| FNV | $168.47 | +0.14% | 32.5B | 52.48 | $3.21 | +0.87% |
| AU | $44.02 | +2.12% | 22.2B | 20.19 | $2.18 | +2.08% |
| GFI | $22.72 | +2.53% | 20.3B | 16.46 | $1.38 | +2.41% |
| KGC | $14.80 | +1.96% | 18.2B | 15.10 | $0.98 | +0.81% |
| RGLD | $178.48 | -0.11% | 11.7B | 29.60 | $6.03 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
GPL vs AEM Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while AEM trades at $117.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs NEM Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while NEM trades at $52.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs WPM Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while WPM trades at $86.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 63.37. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs GOLD Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while GOLD trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs FNV Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while FNV trades at $168.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 52.48. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs AU Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while AU trades at $44.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs GFI Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while GFI trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs KGC Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while KGC trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs RGLD Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while RGLD trades at $178.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs AGI Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while AGI trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs HMY Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while HMY trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs AUY Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs CDE Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while CDE trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs OR Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while OR trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 147.79. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs BTG Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while BTG trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs SBSW Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while SBSW trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs EGO Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while EGO trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs IAG Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while IAG trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs NGD Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while NGD trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs ORLA Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while ORLA trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs HL Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while HL trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 43.79. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs HL-PB Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while HL-PB trades at $51.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1727.33. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs EQX Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while EQX trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs SAND Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while SAND trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 89.35. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs SSRM Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while SSRM trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs CGAU Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while CGAU trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs NVAWW Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while NVAWW trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs NG Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while NG trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -25.46. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs DRD Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while DRD trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs SA Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while SA trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -112.64. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs ARMN Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while ARMN trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs CNL Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 959.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while CNL trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -23.55. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs GSS Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs IAUX Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 411.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while IAUX trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs GAU Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 359.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while GAU trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -19.93. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs DC Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while DC trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs CMCL Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 331.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while CMCL trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs NFGC Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while NFGC trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs ODV Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while ODV trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs CTGO Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while CTGO trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs IDR Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while IDR trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs THM Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while THM trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -41.13. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs GSV Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs VGZ Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 151M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while VGZ trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs GLDG Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while GLDG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs USAU Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while USAU trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs DC-WT Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 122.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while DC-WT trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs TRX Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while TRX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.86. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs GORO Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while GORO trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs HYMC Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while HYMC trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs PZG Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while PZG trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs ODVWZ Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while ODVWZ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs AAU Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs AUST Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while AUST trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs HYMCL Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 352.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while HYMCL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs HYMCW Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs PVG Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs HYMCZ Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.
GPL vs KL Comparison
GPL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPL stands at 0. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPL is priced at $0.19, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, GPL's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPL is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPL.