Gladstone Capital Corporation 7.75% Notes due 2028
Gladstone Capital Corporation 7.75% Notes due 2028 GLADZ Peers
See (GLADZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLADZ | $25.45 | +0.00% | 586.6M | N/A | N/A | +7.63% |
| BNJ | $15.25 | +0.00% | 98B | N/A | N/A | +0.53% |
| SFB | $21.03 | +0.00% | 9.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.61% |
| MGRB | $17.23 | +0.00% | 5.8B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGR | $20.91 | +0.00% | 5.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRD | $15.34 | +0.00% | 5.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| CGBDL | $25.90 | +0.07% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +7.97% |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +14.29% |
| FCRX | $24.70 | +0.00% | 914.3M | 173.73 | $0.14 | +5.06% |
| BULLW | $5.10 | +0.00% | 742.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GLADZ vs BNJ Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while BNJ trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs SFB Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while SFB trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs MGRB Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while MGRB trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs MGR Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while MGR trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs MGRD Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while MGRD trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs CGBDL Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while CGBDL trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs TRINL Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs FCRX Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 914.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while FCRX trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 173.73. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs BULLW Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 742.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while BULLW trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs SAY Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 391M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while SAY trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is more volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs SAJ Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 389.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while SAJ trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is more volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs SAZ Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while SAZ trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs BTMWW Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 366.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while BTMWW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs WHFCL Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while WHFCL trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs GECCZ Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while GECCZ trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs RILYZ Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while RILYZ trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs GEGGL Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while GEGGL trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs STSB Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs CAS Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while CAS trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is more volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs ZBAI Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while ZBAI trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs HBTA Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while HBTA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is less volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.
GLADZ vs GJH Comparison
GLADZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLADZ stands at 586.6M. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLADZ is priced at $25.45, while GJH trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLADZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLADZ's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLADZ is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLADZ.