Greenheart Gold Inc.
Greenheart Gold Inc. (GHRT.V) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GHRT.V) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHRT.V | CA$0.74 | +0.00% | 105M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$98.61 | +0.84% | 108.3B | 12.87 | CA$7.66 | +1.41% |
| AEM.TO | CA$189.37 | -0.24% | 95.1B | 23.21 | CA$8.16 | +1.18% |
| ABX.TO | CA$36.45 | +0.55% | 62.7B | 16.49 | CA$2.21 | +1.95% |
| WPM.TO | CA$132.39 | +0.17% | 60.1B | 54.93 | CA$2.41 | +0.69% |
| FNV.TO | CA$253.16 | -1.06% | 48.8B | 44.81 | CA$5.65 | +0.81% |
| K.TO | CA$27.35 | +0.92% | 33.3B | 15.90 | CA$1.72 | +0.62% |
| LUG.TO | CA$80.50 | +1.21% | 19.4B | 22.87 | CA$3.52 | +2.71% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | CA$39.37 | +0.25% | 16.6B | 34.54 | CA$1.14 | +0.35% |
Stock Comparison
GHRT.V vs NGT.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while NGT.TO trades at CA$98.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check NGT.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs AEM.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while AEM.TO trades at CA$189.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check AEM.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs ABX.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ABX.TO trades at CA$36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ABX.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs WPM.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while WPM.TO trades at CA$132.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check WPM.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs FNV.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while FNV.TO trades at CA$253.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check FNV.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs K.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while K.TO trades at CA$27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check K.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs LUG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while LUG.TO trades at CA$80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check LUG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs NCM.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check NCM.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs AGI.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while AGI.TO trades at CA$39.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check AGI.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs EDV.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while EDV.TO trades at CA$47.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check EDV.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs EQX.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while EQX.TO trades at CA$11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is -62.33. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check EQX.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs OR.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while OR.TO trades at CA$42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 73.53. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check OR.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs YRI.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check YRI.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs BTO.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check BTO.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs IMG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while IMG.TO trades at CA$12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check IMG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs ELD.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ELD.TO trades at CA$32.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ELD.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs NGD.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while NGD.TO trades at CA$7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check NGD.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs OGC.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while OGC.TO trades at CA$23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check OGC.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SSRM.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs OLA.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while OLA.TO trades at CA$14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 144.70. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check OLA.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs PRU.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check PRU.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SSL.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SSL.TO trades at CA$15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 88.41. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SSL.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs DPM.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while DPM.TO trades at CA$25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check DPM.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs TXG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while TXG.TO trades at CA$42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check TXG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs NG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while NG.TO trades at CA$8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check NG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs KNT.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while KNT.TO trades at CA$14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check KNT.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs ORA.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ORA.TO trades at CA$38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -33.55. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ORA.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs CEE.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check CEE.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs WGX.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check WGX.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs WDO.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while WDO.TO trades at CA$17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check WDO.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs CXB.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check CXB.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SEA.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SEA.TO trades at CA$22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -41.29. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SEA.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs CG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while CG.TO trades at CA$10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check CG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs AAUC.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs OSK.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check OSK.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs CNL.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while CNL.TO trades at CA$15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check CNL.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SBB.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SBB.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs KRR.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check KRR.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs RUP.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -168.67. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check RUP.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs MSA.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 965.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while MSA.TO trades at CA$3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check MSA.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs IAU.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 847.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while IAU.TO trades at CA$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check IAU.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs ASE.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 811.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -25.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ASE.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs GTWO.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 757.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -78.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs GAU.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 749.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.75. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check GAU.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs ORE.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ORE.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs AR.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check AR.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs PRB.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 487.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -21.73. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check PRB.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs MND.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check MND.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SGD.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SGD.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs ITH.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 397.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -63.67. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ITH.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs MOZ.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs STGO.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 374.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check STGO.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs FDR.V Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 368.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -60.17. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check FDR.V's competition here
GHRT.V vs JAG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while JAG.TO trades at CA$4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check JAG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SBI.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SBI.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs GOLD.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs FF.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 230.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check FF.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs DNG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 196.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check DNG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs VGZ.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 190.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.20. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs LGD.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check LGD.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs LN.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check LN.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs G.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while G.TO trades at CA$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check G.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs TNX.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check TNX.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs NEXG.V Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 126.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check NEXG.V's competition here
GHRT.V vs BSX.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 122.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check BSX.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs COG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check COG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs STLR.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check STLR.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs CBR.V Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check CBR.V's competition here
GHRT.V vs ELO.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ELO.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs XTG.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check XTG.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs MAW.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check MAW.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SANU.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SANU.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs BLLG.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs CCM.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check CCM.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs ESM.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ESM.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SIG.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SIG.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs CGC.V Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -19.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check CGC.V's competition here
GHRT.V vs TML.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check TML.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs VEIN.V Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check VEIN.V's competition here
GHRT.V vs HMR.V Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check HMR.V's competition here
GHRT.V vs GTCH.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs ME.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check ME.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs NOM.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check NOM.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs USGD.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check USGD.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs NHK.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check NHK.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs BNN.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check BNN.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs AUOZ.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs MLM.NE Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, MLM.NE has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while MLM.NE trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLM.NE's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MLM.NE's ROE of +31.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to MLM.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check MLM.NE's competition here
GHRT.V vs VLC.V Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check VLC.V's competition here
GHRT.V vs AMM.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check AMM.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs NVO.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check NVO.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs VGCX.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs SGNL.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs QIM.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check QIM.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs GRC.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check GRC.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs HWG.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check HWG.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs WG.CN Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while WG.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to WG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check WG.CN's competition here
GHRT.V vs YRB.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check YRB.TO's competition here
GHRT.V vs PME.TO Comparison August 2025
GHRT.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHRT.V stands at 105M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHRT.V is priced at CA$0.74, while PME.TO trades at CA$3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHRT.V currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, GHRT.V's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GHRT.V is more volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHRT.V.Check PME.TO's competition here