Greenfire Resources Ltd.
Greenfire Resources Ltd. (GFR.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFR.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFR.TO | CA$6.36 | -2.15% | 446.7M | 2.44 | CA$2.61 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | CA$44.12 | -0.61% | 92.4B | 12.39 | CA$3.56 | +6.53% |
| TOU.TO | CA$62.93 | +0.21% | 24.3B | 18.62 | CA$3.38 | +4.86% |
| ARX.TO | CA$27.77 | -0.36% | 16.2B | 12.29 | CA$2.26 | +2.67% |
| OVV.TO | CA$58.48 | -1.12% | 15B | 18.80 | CA$3.11 | +2.91% |
| WCP.TO | CA$10.72 | -0.19% | 13.2B | 7.34 | CA$1.46 | +6.83% |
| SCR.TO | CA$34.91 | -0.11% | 7.5B | 10.55 | CA$3.31 | +3.05% |
| CPG.TO | CA$11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | CA$0.49 | +5.03% |
| MEG.TO | CA$27.57 | -0.29% | 7B | 11.83 | CA$2.33 | +1.46% |
| PSK.TO | CA$24.24 | -0.16% | 5.7B | 26.06 | CA$0.93 | +4.23% |
Stock Comparison
GFR.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while CNQ.TO trades at CA$44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check CNQ.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while TOU.TO trades at CA$62.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check TOU.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while ARX.TO trades at CA$27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check ARX.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while OVV.TO trades at CA$58.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check OVV.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while WCP.TO trades at CA$10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check WCP.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while SCR.TO trades at CA$34.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check SCR.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while CPG.TO trades at CA$11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check CPG.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while MEG.TO trades at CA$27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check MEG.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PSK.TO trades at CA$24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PSK.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while ERF.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check ERF.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PEY.TO trades at CA$19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PEY.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs POU.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while POU.TO trades at CA$21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check POU.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while NVA.TO trades at CA$14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check NVA.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while ATH.TO trades at CA$5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check ATH.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while TVE.TO trades at CA$5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check TVE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while IPCO.TO trades at CA$23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check IPCO.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while BTE.TO trades at CA$3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check BTE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while FRU.TO trades at CA$13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check FRU.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while BIR.TO trades at CA$6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check BIR.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while AAV.TO trades at CA$11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -61.67. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check AAV.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs VET.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while VET.TO trades at CA$11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -55.24. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check VET.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while HWX.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check HWX.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PXT.TO trades at CA$16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PXT.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while KEL.TO trades at CA$7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check KEL.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while AOI.TO trades at CA$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check AOI.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while CJ.TO trades at CA$7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check CJ.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs CR.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while CR.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check CR.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 976.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while KEC.TO trades at CA$22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check KEC.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 959.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while VLE.TO trades at CA$9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check VLE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 954.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while SDE.TO trades at CA$4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check SDE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 750.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while SGY.TO trades at CA$7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check SGY.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while BIR-PA.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check BIR-PA.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 667.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while TAL.TO trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check TAL.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 599.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while OBE.TO trades at CA$8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check OBE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PIPE.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PIPE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 511.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while TNZ.TO trades at CA$18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -41.38. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check TNZ.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 469.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while SOIL.TO trades at CA$2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check SOIL.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while FEC.TO trades at CA$6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check FEC.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while TGL.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check TGL.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while KEI.TO trades at CA$8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check KEI.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 300.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while IPO.TO trades at CA$10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check IPO.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while ITE.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check ITE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PNE.TO trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PNE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 214.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while GTE.TO trades at CA$6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.13. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check GTE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while RBY.TO trades at CA$2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check RBY.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 194.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PRQ.TO trades at CA$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PRQ.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while JOY.TO trades at CA$2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check JOY.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while BNE.TO trades at CA$3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 76.80. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check BNE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while QEC.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check QEC.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while GXE.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check GXE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while CDR.TO trades at CA$1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -34.80. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check CDR.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while YGR.TO trades at CA$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check YGR.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PEA.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PEA.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while FORZ.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check FORZ.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while CNE.TO trades at CA$2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check CNE.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while TXP.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check TXP.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PPR.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PPR.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while PMT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check PMT.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while XOP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GFR.TO has daily volatility of 3.77 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check XOP.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while BNG.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check BNG.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while TCF.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check TCF.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while SQX.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check SQX.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while OIL.CN trades at CA$4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check OIL.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while BDR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of -80.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check BDR.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while SHP.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check SHP.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while VIK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check VIK.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 810.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while JBR.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check JBR.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while WOGC.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check WOGC.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while GTOO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check GTOO.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs EI.CN Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while EI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check EI.CN's competition here
GFR.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while SRX.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check SRX.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while CPI.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check CPI.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while BIR-PC.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check BIR-PC.TO's competition here
GFR.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison July 2025
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 446.7M. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.36, while CNU.TO trades at CA$121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.44, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.Check CNU.TO's competition here