Greenfire Resources Ltd.
Greenfire Resources Ltd. GFR.TO Peers
See (GFR.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFR.TO | CA$6.19 | +4.21% | 434.7M | 2.38 | CA$2.60 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | CA$43.25 | +2.10% | 90.5B | 12.15 | CA$3.56 | +5.08% |
| TOU.TO | CA$63.97 | +1.14% | 24B | 18.93 | CA$3.38 | +2.65% |
| ARX.TO | CA$29.58 | +1.68% | 17.3B | 13.09 | CA$2.26 | +2.43% |
| OVV.TO | CA$52.28 | +3.20% | 13.6B | 16.44 | CA$3.18 | +3.21% |
| WCP.TO | CA$8.69 | +0.12% | 10.7B | 5.68 | CA$1.53 | +8.36% |
| CPG.TO | CA$11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | CA$0.49 | +5.03% |
| MEG.TO | CA$25.42 | +0.32% | 6.5B | 10.91 | CA$2.33 | +1.18% |
| SCR.TO | CA$29.38 | +0.10% | 6.3B | 8.93 | CA$3.29 | +2.60% |
| ERF.TO | CA$26.78 | -3.36% | 5.7B | 10.93 | CA$2.45 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFR.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while CNQ.TO trades at CA$43.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while TOU.TO trades at CA$63.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while ARX.TO trades at CA$29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while OVV.TO trades at CA$52.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while WCP.TO trades at CA$8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while CPG.TO trades at CA$11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while MEG.TO trades at CA$25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while SCR.TO trades at CA$29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while ERF.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PSK.TO trades at CA$23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PEY.TO trades at CA$19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while NVA.TO trades at CA$14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs POU.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while POU.TO trades at CA$19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while ATH.TO trades at CA$5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while IPCO.TO trades at CA$20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while TVE.TO trades at CA$4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while FRU.TO trades at CA$12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while AAV.TO trades at CA$11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -64.89. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while BIR.TO trades at CA$6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while BTE.TO trades at CA$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while HWX.TO trades at CA$6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs VET.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while VET.TO trades at CA$9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -46.95. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PXT.TO trades at CA$14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while KEL.TO trades at CA$6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while AOI.TO trades at CA$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs CR.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while CR.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while CJ.TO trades at CA$6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 796M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while VLE.TO trades at CA$7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 768.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while KEC.TO trades at CA$17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while BIR-PA.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 694.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while SDE.TO trades at CA$3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 595.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while TAL.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 554.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while SGY.TO trades at CA$5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PIPE.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 525.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while OBE.TO trades at CA$7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 505.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while TNZ.TO trades at CA$18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -40.84. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 479.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while FEC.TO trades at CA$6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 391.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while SOIL.TO trades at CA$1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while TGL.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while KEI.TO trades at CA$9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while ITE.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while IPO.TO trades at CA$9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while GTE.TO trades at CA$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PNE.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PRQ.TO trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 135.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while RBY.TO trades at CA$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while BNE.TO trades at CA$3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 71.60. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while GXE.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while JOY.TO trades at CA$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while CDR.TO trades at CA$1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -36.20. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while QEC.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while YGR.TO trades at CA$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PEA.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 94.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while CNE.TO trades at CA$2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while FORZ.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while TXP.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PPR.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while PMT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while XOP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GFR.TO has daily volatility of 2.60 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
GFR.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while BNG.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while TCF.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while SQX.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while OIL.CN trades at CA$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while JBR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while SHP.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is less volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while VIK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while BDR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while WOGC.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while GTOO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs EI.CN Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while EI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while CPI.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while BIR-PC.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while CNU.TO trades at CA$121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.
GFR.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison
GFR.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR.TO stands at 434.7M. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFR.TO is priced at CA$6.19, while SRX.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.38, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, GFR.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.TO.