Gama Explorations Inc.
Gama Explorations Inc. (GAMA.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GAMA.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAMA.CN | CA$0.15 | +11.11% | 9.2M | -1.88 | -CA$0.08 | N/A |
| TECK-B.TO | CA$46.16 | -0.71% | 23.4B | 102.58 | CA$0.45 | +2.17% |
| TECK-A.TO | CA$46.56 | -0.72% | 22.8B | 103.47 | CA$0.45 | +2.13% |
| IVN.TO | CA$11.75 | +0.34% | 15.9B | 29.38 | CA$0.40 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | CA$8.86 | -0.56% | 5.7B | 9.53 | CA$0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | CA$32.25 | -1.01% | 4.4B | -31.01 | -CA$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | CA$21.03 | +0.00% | 4.4B | -46.73 | -CA$0.45 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | CA$21.26 | +0.57% | 2.4B | -14.17 | -CA$1.50 | N/A |
| VZLA.TO | CA$4.83 | -0.41% | 1.7B | -161.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | CA$2.87 | +2.14% | 1.5B | -95.67 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GAMA.CN vs TECK-B.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TECK-B.TO trades at CA$46.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 102.58. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to TECK-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check TECK-B.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TECK-A.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TECK-A.TO trades at CA$46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 103.47. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to TECK-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check TECK-A.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs IVN.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while IVN.TO trades at CA$11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to IVN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check IVN.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs AKE.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AKE.TO trades at CA$8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to AKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check AKE.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs FIL.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FIL.TO trades at CA$32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to FIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check FIL.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs NGEX.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NGEX.TO trades at CA$21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -46.73. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to NGEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check NGEX.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SKE.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SKE.TO trades at CA$21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SKE.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs VZLA.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VZLA.TO trades at CA$4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -161.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to VZLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check VZLA.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs FOM.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FOM.TO trades at CA$2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -95.67. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to FOM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check FOM.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs ALS.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ALS.TO trades at CA$29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to ALS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check ALS.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs AII.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AII.TO trades at CA$5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to AII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check AII.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs USA.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 901.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while USA.TO trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to USA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check USA.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LAC.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 875.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LAC.TO trades at CA$3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to LAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check LAC.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs MDI.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MDI.TO trades at CA$9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to MDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check MDI.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs NDM.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NDM.TO trades at CA$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to NDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check NDM.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs FVL.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 656M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FVL.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -124.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to FVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check FVL.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LAAC.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LAAC.TO trades at CA$3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to LAAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check LAAC.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs PMET.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 618.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PMET.TO trades at CA$3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -127.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to PMET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check PMET.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs POM.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while POM.TO trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to POM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check POM.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SAU.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 470.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SAU.TO trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SAU.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LUCA.V Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 455.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LUCA.V trades at CA$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -17.30. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to LUCA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check LUCA.V's competition here
GAMA.CN vs ETG.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 439.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ETG.TO trades at CA$2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -30.29. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to ETG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check ETG.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs PRYM.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PRYM.TO trades at CA$2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to PRYM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check PRYM.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SOLG.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SOLG.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SOLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SOLG.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs ERD.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 398.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ERD.TO trades at CA$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to ERD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check ERD.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TLO.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TLO.TO trades at CA$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to TLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check TLO.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs WRN.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while WRN.TO trades at CA$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to WRN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check WRN.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TMQ.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 361.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TMQ.TO trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to TMQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check TMQ.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs ECOR.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 338.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ECOR.TO trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -27.20. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to ECOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check ECOR.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs ARA.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 334.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ARA.TO trades at CA$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to ARA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check ARA.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TLG.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 324.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TLG.TO trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to TLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check TLG.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LIRC.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LIRC.TO trades at CA$5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -41.21. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to LIRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check LIRC.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs MNO.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 299M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MNO.TO trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to MNO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check MNO.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LIFT.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LIFT.CN trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to LIFT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check LIFT.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SMT.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SMT.TO trades at CA$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SMT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SMT.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs GLO.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while GLO.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to GLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check GLO.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs FAR.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 188.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FAR.TO trades at CA$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to FAR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check FAR.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs VROY.V Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VROY.V trades at CA$2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to VROY.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check VROY.V's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TI.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 177.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TI.TO trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of +9.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to TI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check TI.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs MOLY.NE Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MOLY.NE trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to MOLY.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check MOLY.NE's competition here
GAMA.CN vs GEO.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while GEO.TO trades at CA$3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to GEO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check GEO.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LAM.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check LAM.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs IBAT.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while IBAT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and IBAT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IBAT.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LGO.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LGO.TO trades at CA$2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to LGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check LGO.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs CDPR.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CDPR.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to CDPR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check CDPR.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs NB.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NB.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of -9.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to NB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check NB.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs FSY.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check FSY.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs FURY.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FURY.TO trades at CA$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to FURY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check FURY.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TSK.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TSK.TO trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -12.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to TSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check TSK.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SLR.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SLR.TO trades at CA$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SLR.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs AMC.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AMC.TO trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to AMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check AMC.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs NCF.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NCF.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to NCF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check NCF.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs GENM.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while GENM.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to GENM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check GENM.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs AOT.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AOT.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to AOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check AOT.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs GMX.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while GMX.TO trades at CA$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to GMX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check GMX.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs NEXT.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NEXT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to NEXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check NEXT.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs WM.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while WM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to WM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check WM.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs PM.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PM.CN trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to PM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check PM.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs S.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while S.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to S.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check S.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs NVLH.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NVLH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and NVLH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVLH.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs RUA.V Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while RUA.V trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to RUA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check RUA.V's competition here
GAMA.CN vs OGD.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while OGD.TO trades at CA$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to OGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check OGD.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs RTG.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while RTG.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and RTG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTG.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TOC.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TOC.CN trades at CA$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and TOC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOC.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs ARS.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ARS.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and ARS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARS.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs MIN.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MIN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and MIN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIN.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs FT.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FT.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to FT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check FT.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs FOX.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FOX.CN trades at CA$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and FOX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOX.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs RUA.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while RUA.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to RUA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check RUA.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs VALU.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VALU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and VALU.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VALU.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LFLR.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LFLR.CN has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LFLR.CN trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LFLR.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LFLR.CN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to LFLR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check LFLR.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs BKI.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BKI.TO trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to BKI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check BKI.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs AVL.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AVL.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to AVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check AVL.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs VOY.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VOY.CN trades at CA$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and VOY.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOY.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs EGFV.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while EGFV.CN trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and EGFV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGFV.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs AMPS.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and AMPS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMPS.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs AAN.V Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AAN.V trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to AAN.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check AAN.V's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SX.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SX.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SX.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SAM.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SAM.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SAM.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs MAXX.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MAXX.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to MAXX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check MAXX.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs URNM.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while URNM.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and URNM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check URNM.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs EXN.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while EXN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to EXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check EXN.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LVL.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LVL.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GAMA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check LVL.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs WRX.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while WRX.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and WRX.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRX.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SLV.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SLV.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SLV.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SUPR.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SUPR.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and SUPR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUPR.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs PNRG.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PNRG.CN has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PNRG.CN trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas PNRG.CN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PNRG.CN's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to PNRG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check PNRG.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SVB.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SVB.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SVB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SVB.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs COSA.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while COSA.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to COSA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check COSA.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs ASND.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ASND.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and ASND.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASND.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TTX.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TTX.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and TTX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTX.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs SCY.TO Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SCY.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to SCY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check SCY.TO's competition here
GAMA.CN vs PEK.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PEK.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to PEK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check PEK.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs EMET.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, EMET.CN has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while EMET.CN trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas EMET.CN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to EMET.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and EMET.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMET.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs PSE.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PSE.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PSE.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas PSE.CN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PSE.CN's ROE of +4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and PSE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSE.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs NXU.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NXU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and NXU.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXU.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs LIM.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LIM.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN and LIM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIM.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs STGX.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, STGX.CN has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while STGX.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas STGX.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to STGX.CN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to STGX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check STGX.CN's competition here
GAMA.CN vs TN.CN Comparison August 2025
GAMA.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAMA.CN stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAMA.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TN.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAMA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.88, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, GAMA.CN's ROE is -0.35%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GAMA.CN is less volatile compared to TN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAMA.CN.Check TN.CN's competition here