Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. FVI.TO Peers
See (FVI.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVI.TO | $7.79 | -1.77% | 2.39B | 13.67 | $0.57 | N/A |
| PAAS.TO | $31.89 | -15.86% | 11.55B | 74.16 | $0.43 | +1.75% |
| AG.TO | $8.15 | -0.85% | 3.95B | -17.34 | -$0.47 | +0.32% |
| MAG.TO | $25.11 | +6.49% | 2.60B | 24.14 | $1.04 | +1.01% |
| FR.TO | $8.27 | +3.25% | 2.41B | -37.59 | -$0.22 | +0.32% |
| DSV.TO | $2.48 | -9.82% | 1.97B | -49.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| AYA.TO | $10.03 | +0.30% | 1.31B | -35.82 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| SVM.TO | $5.07 | -5.76% | 1.10B | 10.14 | $0.50 | +0.68% |
| BIG.V | $0.68 | -1.45% | 175.69M | -8.50 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| SVRS.V | $0.14 | -3.57% | 67.77M | -2.70 | -$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FVI.TO vs PAAS.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, PAAS.TO has a market cap of 11.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while PAAS.TO trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PAAS.TO's P/E ratio is 74.16. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAAS.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is less volatile compared to PAAS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs AG.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, AG.TO has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while AG.TO trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AG.TO's P/E ratio is -17.34. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AG.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to AG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs MAG.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, MAG.TO has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while MAG.TO trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MAG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is less volatile compared to MAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs FR.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, FR.TO has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while FR.TO trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FR.TO's P/E ratio is -37.59. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FR.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is less volatile compared to FR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs DSV.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, DSV.TO has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while DSV.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DSV.TO's P/E ratio is -49.60. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSV.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is less volatile compared to DSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs AYA.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, AYA.TO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while AYA.TO trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AYA.TO's P/E ratio is -35.82. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AYA.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is less volatile compared to AYA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs SVM.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, SVM.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while SVM.TO trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SVM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to SVM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs BIG.V Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, BIG.V has a market cap of 175.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while BIG.V trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BIG.V's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIG.V's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to BIG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs SVRS.V Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, SVRS.V has a market cap of 67.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while SVRS.V trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SVRS.V's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVRS.V's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to SVRS.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs BNKR.V Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, BNKR.V has a market cap of 50.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while BNKR.V trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BNKR.V's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNKR.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is less volatile compared to BNKR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs BNKR.CN Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, BNKR.CN has a market cap of 44.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while BNKR.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BNKR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNKR.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is less volatile compared to BNKR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs SBR.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, SBR.TO has a market cap of 33.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while SBR.TO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SBR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBR.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to SBR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs KUYA.CN Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, KUYA.CN has a market cap of 29.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while KUYA.CN trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KUYA.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KUYA.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to KUYA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs MSV.TO Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, MSV.TO has a market cap of 13.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while MSV.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MSV.TO's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSV.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to MSV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs HAMR.CN Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, HAMR.CN has a market cap of 3.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while HAMR.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HAMR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAMR.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to HAMR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs CSS.CN Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, CSS.CN has a market cap of 2.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while CSS.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CSS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSS.CN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is less volatile compared to CSS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.
FVI.TO vs KTRI.V Comparison
FVI.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVI.TO stands at 2.39B. In comparison, KTRI.V has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FVI.TO is priced at $7.79, while KTRI.V trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KTRI.V's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FVI.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTRI.V's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVI.TO is more volatile compared to KTRI.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVI.TO.