Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while CCL trades at $31.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check CCL's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while CUK trades at $31.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check CUK's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while AS trades at $41.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 76.31. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check AS's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while HAS trades at $101.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is -44.11. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to HAS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check HAS's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while PLNT trades at $91.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 37.15. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check PLNT's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while LTH trades at $28.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check LTH's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while GOLF trades at $99.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check GOLF's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while MAT trades at $17.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check MAT's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while ELY trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ELY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check ELY's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while YETI trades at $47.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check YETI's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while SEAS trades at $50.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check SEAS's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while MODG trades at $14.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check MODG's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while SIX trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check SIX's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CALY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while CALY trades at $14.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CALY's P/E ratio is 69.57. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CALY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to CALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check CALY's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while VSTO trades at $44.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check VSTO's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while OSW trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check OSW's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while PRKS trades at $35.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check PRKS's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while PTON trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -36.75. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check PTON's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while LUCK trades at $8.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -13.02. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to LUCK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check LUCK's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while GEAR trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check GEAR's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 527.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while JOUT trades at $48.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -23.06. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check JOUT's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HERE has a market cap of 455.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while HERE trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas HERE's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to HERE's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to HERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check HERE's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while XPOF trades at $8.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check XPOF's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while FNKO trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check FNKO's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while CNXA trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CNXA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check CNXA's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 253.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while JAKK trades at $18.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check JAKK's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 197M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while PLBY trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +3.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check PLBY's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 194.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while ESCA trades at $13.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check ESCA's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while SRM trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SRM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check SRM's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while CLAR trades at $3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check CLAR's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while AOUT trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -21.34. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check AOUT's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while AGH trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -20.95. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check AGH's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NOMA has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while NOMA trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NOMA's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to NOMA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to NOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check NOMA's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while ISPO trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check ISPO's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while BTN trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check BTN's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TRON has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while TRON trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas TRON's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to TRON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to TRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check TRON's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KMRK has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while KMRK trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas KMRK's P/E ratio is 68.33. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to KMRK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to KMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check KMRK's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while NLS trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check NLS's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while FGH trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check FGH's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while DOGZ trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check DOGZ's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while YYAI trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to YYAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check YYAI's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while HWH trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to HWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check HWH's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while NWTG trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check NWTG's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while MMA trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MMA's ROE of -20.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check MMA's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while GDHG trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check GDHG's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while FXLV trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check FXLV's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while SPGC trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check SPGC's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check ISPOW's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 70.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while BBIG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check BBIG's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check DS-PC's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ILG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while ILG trades at $34.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ILG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ILG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to ILG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check ILG's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MYCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while MYCC trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MYCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MYCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to MYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check MYCC's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check DS-PB's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check BWL-A's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while DS trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check DS's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check DS-PD's competition here

FUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUN is priced at $17.58, while DVD trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FUN's ROE is -1.49%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUN is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUN.Check DVD's competition here