FTC Solar, Inc.
FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FTCI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCI | $8.37 | +0.00% | 122.4M | -1.99 | -$4.12 | N/A |
| FSLR | $233.30 | +0.00% | 26B | 18.56 | $13.03 | N/A |
| ENPH | $44.25 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 36.09 | $1.29 | N/A |
| RUN | $20.04 | +0.00% | 4.7B | -1.79 | -$11.33 | N/A |
| SEDG | $34.96 | +0.00% | 2.3B | -3.94 | -$9.63 | N/A |
| SHLS | $10.19 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 55.84 | $0.19 | N/A |
| ARRY | $10.93 | +0.00% | 1.7B | -18.41 | -$0.61 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $19.84 | +0.00% | 1.3B | -105.53 | -$0.19 | N/A |
| SOL | $1.94 | +0.52% | 995.6M | -10.78 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| JKS | $26.15 | +0.00% | 341.2M | -2.78 | -$9.52 | +4.84% |
Stock Comparison
FTCI vs FSLR Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while FSLR trades at $233.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check FSLR's competition here
FTCI vs ENPH Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while ENPH trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ENPH's competition here
FTCI vs RUN Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, RUN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while RUN trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas RUN's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to RUN's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to RUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check RUN's competition here
FTCI vs SEDG Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SEDG trades at $34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SEDG's competition here
FTCI vs SHLS Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SHLS trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 55.84. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SHLS's competition here
FTCI vs ARRY Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while ARRY trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -18.41. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ARRY's competition here
FTCI vs CSIQ Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while CSIQ trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -105.53. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check CSIQ's competition here
FTCI vs SOL Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SOL trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SOL's competition here
FTCI vs JKS Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while JKS trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check JKS's competition here
FTCI vs TOYO Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 269M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while TOYO trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check TOYO's competition here
FTCI vs TYGO Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while TYGO trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -6.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check TYGO's competition here
FTCI vs CSLR Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to CSLR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check CSLR's competition here
FTCI vs ZEOWW Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while ZEOWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ZEOWW's competition here
FTCI vs SPWR Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SPWR trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPWR's competition here
FTCI vs SPRU Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SPRU trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPRU's competition here
FTCI vs ZEO Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while ZEO trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ZEO's competition here
FTCI vs MAXN Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while MAXN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check MAXN's competition here
FTCI vs SMXT Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SMXT trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SMXT's competition here
FTCI vs NOVA Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check NOVA's competition here
FTCI vs SPI Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPI's competition here
FTCI vs BEEM Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while BEEM trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check BEEM's competition here
FTCI vs VVPR Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while VVPR trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VVPR's competition here
FTCI vs ASTI Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while ASTI trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ASTI's competition here
FTCI vs SPWRW Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SPWRW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPWRW's competition here
FTCI vs PN Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while PN trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas PN's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to PN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check PN's competition here
FTCI vs PEGY Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check PEGY's competition here
FTCI vs VSTE Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VSTE's competition here
FTCI vs SUNW Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SUNW's competition here
FTCI vs ISUN Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ISUN's competition here
FTCI vs TURB Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while TURB trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check TURB's competition here
FTCI vs BEEMW Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check BEEMW's competition here
FTCI vs VSTEW Comparison February 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 122.4M. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 960.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $8.37, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.99, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is -7.42%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VSTEW's competition here