FTC Solar, Inc.
FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FTCI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCI | $4.60 | +0.00% | 66.6M | -1.08 | -$4.12 | N/A |
| FSLR | $200.35 | +1.41% | 21B | 13.81 | $14.20 | N/A |
| ENPH | $45.59 | +7.02% | 5.8B | 34.16 | $1.29 | N/A |
| RUN | $12.95 | +8.19% | 2.8B | 7.10 | $1.71 | N/A |
| SEDG | $40.01 | +13.68% | 2.3B | -5.44 | -$6.88 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $18.81 | +4.33% | 1.2B | -96.89 | -$0.19 | N/A |
| ARRY | $7.03 | +3.44% | 1.1B | -9.49 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| SHLS | $6.24 | +1.96% | 1B | 30.65 | $0.20 | N/A |
| SOL | $1.94 | +0.52% | 995.6M | -10.78 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| JKS | $25.38 | -1.57% | 330.5M | -2.67 | -$9.57 | +5.03% |
Stock Comparison
FTCI vs FSLR Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while FSLR trades at $200.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check FSLR's competition here
FTCI vs ENPH Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while ENPH trades at $45.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ENPH's competition here
FTCI vs RUN Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, RUN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while RUN trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas RUN's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to RUN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to RUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check RUN's competition here
FTCI vs SEDG Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SEDG trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SEDG's competition here
FTCI vs CSIQ Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while CSIQ trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -96.89. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check CSIQ's competition here
FTCI vs ARRY Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while ARRY trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ARRY's competition here
FTCI vs SHLS Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SHLS trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SHLS's competition here
FTCI vs SOL Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SOL trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SOL's competition here
FTCI vs JKS Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 330.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while JKS trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check JKS's competition here
FTCI vs TOYO Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while TOYO trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check TOYO's competition here
FTCI vs TYGO Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while TYGO trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -114.33. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check TYGO's competition here
FTCI vs CSLR Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to CSLR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check CSLR's competition here
FTCI vs ZEOWW Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while ZEOWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ZEOWW's competition here
FTCI vs SPWR Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SPWR trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPWR's competition here
FTCI vs SPRU Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SPRU trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPRU's competition here
FTCI vs ZEO Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while ZEO trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ZEO's competition here
FTCI vs MAXN Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while MAXN trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check MAXN's competition here
FTCI vs SMXT Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SMXT trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SMXT's competition here
FTCI vs NOVA Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check NOVA's competition here
FTCI vs SPI Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPI's competition here
FTCI vs BEEM Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while BEEM trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check BEEM's competition here
FTCI vs SPWRW Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SPWRW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SPWRW's competition here
FTCI vs VVPR Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while VVPR trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VVPR's competition here
FTCI vs ASTI Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while ASTI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ASTI's competition here
FTCI vs PN Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while PN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas PN's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to PN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check PN's competition here
FTCI vs TURB Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while TURB trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -15.61. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check TURB's competition here
FTCI vs PEGY Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check PEGY's competition here
FTCI vs VSTE Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VSTE's competition here
FTCI vs SUNW Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check SUNW's competition here
FTCI vs ISUN Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check ISUN's competition here
FTCI vs BEEMW Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, BEEMW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while BEEMW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas BEEMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to BEEMW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to BEEMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check BEEMW's competition here
FTCI vs VSTEW Comparison March 2026
FTCI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCI stands at 66.6M. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 960.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FTCI is priced at $4.60, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCI currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCI's ROE is +10.44%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCI is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCI.Check VSTEW's competition here