Frog Innovations Ltd.
Frog Innovations Ltd. (FROG.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FROG.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FROG.NS | ₹138.90 | +9.93% | 2B | 11.29 | ₹11.13 | N/A |
| ITI.BO | ₹255.75 | -5.42% | 244.6B | -165.32 | -₹1.54 | N/A |
| ITI.NS | ₹256.05 | -6.74% | 243.5B | -164.58 | -₹1.54 | N/A |
| CPPLUS.NS | ₹1,673.40 | -0.07% | 193.4B | 75.82 | ₹21.66 | N/A |
| HFCL.BO | ₹69.74 | -1.68% | 101.8B | 184.78 | ₹0.36 | +0.15% |
| HFCL.NS | ₹69.58 | -1.56% | 101.7B | 184.69 | ₹0.36 | +0.15% |
| ASTRAMICRO.BO | ₹913.95 | +2.56% | 84.9B | 52.84 | ₹16.93 | +0.25% |
| ASTRAMICRO.NS | ₹913.35 | +2.53% | 84.7B | 52.98 | ₹16.84 | +0.25% |
| STLTECH.NS | ₹180.02 | -2.62% | 84.5B | 2165.00 | ₹0.08 | N/A |
| TEJASNET.NS | ₹420.75 | -2.67% | 71.1B | -9.16 | -₹43.77 | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
FROG.NS vs ITI.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, ITI.BO has a market cap of 244.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while ITI.BO trades at ₹255.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ITI.BO's P/E ratio is -165.32. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ITI.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to ITI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check ITI.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs ITI.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, ITI.NS has a market cap of 243.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while ITI.NS trades at ₹256.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ITI.NS's P/E ratio is -164.58. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ITI.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to ITI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check ITI.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs CPPLUS.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, CPPLUS.NS has a market cap of 193.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while CPPLUS.NS trades at ₹1,673.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CPPLUS.NS's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CPPLUS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to CPPLUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check CPPLUS.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs HFCL.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, HFCL.BO has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while HFCL.BO trades at ₹69.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas HFCL.BO's P/E ratio is 184.78. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HFCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to HFCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check HFCL.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs HFCL.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, HFCL.NS has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while HFCL.NS trades at ₹69.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas HFCL.NS's P/E ratio is 184.69. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HFCL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to HFCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check HFCL.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs ASTRAMICRO.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, ASTRAMICRO.BO has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while ASTRAMICRO.BO trades at ₹913.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ASTRAMICRO.BO's P/E ratio is 52.84. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTRAMICRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAMICRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check ASTRAMICRO.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs ASTRAMICRO.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, ASTRAMICRO.NS has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while ASTRAMICRO.NS trades at ₹913.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ASTRAMICRO.NS's P/E ratio is 52.98. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTRAMICRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAMICRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check ASTRAMICRO.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs STLTECH.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, STLTECH.NS has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while STLTECH.NS trades at ₹180.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas STLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 2165.00. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STLTECH.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to STLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check STLTECH.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs TEJASNET.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, TEJASNET.NS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while TEJASNET.NS trades at ₹420.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TEJASNET.NS's P/E ratio is -9.16. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEJASNET.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to TEJASNET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check TEJASNET.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs TEJASNET.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, TEJASNET.BO has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while TEJASNET.BO trades at ₹420.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TEJASNET.BO's P/E ratio is -9.16. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEJASNET.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to TEJASNET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check TEJASNET.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs AVANTEL.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, AVANTEL.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while AVANTEL.BO trades at ₹121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas AVANTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 303.33. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVANTEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to AVANTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check AVANTEL.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs AVANTEL.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, AVANTEL.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while AVANTEL.NS trades at ₹121.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas AVANTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 303.31. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVANTEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to AVANTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check AVANTEL.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs DLINKINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, DLINKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while DLINKINDIA.NS trades at ₹393.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas DLINKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DLINKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to DLINKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check DLINKINDIA.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs DLINKINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, DLINKINDIA.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while DLINKINDIA.BO trades at ₹394.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas DLINKINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DLINKINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to DLINKINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check DLINKINDIA.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs GTLINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, GTLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while GTLINFRA.BO trades at ₹1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas GTLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GTLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to GTLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check GTLINFRA.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs GTLINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, GTLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while GTLINFRA.NS trades at ₹1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas GTLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GTLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to GTLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check GTLINFRA.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs NELCO.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, NELCO.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while NELCO.BO trades at ₹553.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas NELCO.BO's P/E ratio is -656.89. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NELCO.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to NELCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check NELCO.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs NELCO.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, NELCO.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while NELCO.NS trades at ₹552.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas NELCO.NS's P/E ratio is -656.04. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NELCO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to NELCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check NELCO.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs PARACABLES.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, PARACABLES.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while PARACABLES.NS trades at ₹33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PARACABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PARACABLES.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to PARACABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check PARACABLES.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs PARACABLES.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, PARACABLES.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while PARACABLES.BO trades at ₹33.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PARACABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PARACABLES.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to PARACABLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check PARACABLES.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs VALIANT.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, VALIANT.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while VALIANT.BO trades at ₹995.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas VALIANT.BO's P/E ratio is 55.42. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VALIANT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to VALIANT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check VALIANT.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs ADCINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, ADCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while ADCINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,273.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ADCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADCINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to ADCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check ADCINDIA.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs PANACHE.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, PANACHE.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while PANACHE.NS trades at ₹307.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PANACHE.NS's P/E ratio is 53.06. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PANACHE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to PANACHE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check PANACHE.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs BIRLACABLE.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, BIRLACABLE.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while BIRLACABLE.BO trades at ₹116.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas BIRLACABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.79. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BIRLACABLE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check BIRLACABLE.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs BIRLACABLE.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, BIRLACABLE.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while BIRLACABLE.NS trades at ₹116.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas BIRLACABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.72. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BIRLACABLE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACABLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check BIRLACABLE.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs KAVDEFENCE.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, KAVDEFENCE.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while KAVDEFENCE.NS trades at ₹58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas KAVDEFENCE.NS's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAVDEFENCE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to KAVDEFENCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check KAVDEFENCE.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs KAVDEFENCE.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, KAVDEFENCE.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while KAVDEFENCE.BO trades at ₹58.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas KAVDEFENCE.BO's P/E ratio is 117.45. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAVDEFENCE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to KAVDEFENCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check KAVDEFENCE.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs PRECISIO.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, PRECISIO.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while PRECISIO.BO trades at ₹124.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PRECISIO.BO's P/E ratio is 167.53. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRECISIO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to PRECISIO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check PRECISIO.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs VINTRON.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, VINTRON.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while VINTRON.BO trades at ₹12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas VINTRON.BO's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VINTRON.BO's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to VINTRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check VINTRON.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs KAVVERITEL.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, KAVVERITEL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while KAVVERITEL.NS trades at ₹58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas KAVVERITEL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAVVERITEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to KAVVERITEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check KAVVERITEL.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs KAVVERITEL.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, KAVVERITEL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while KAVVERITEL.BO trades at ₹58.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas KAVVERITEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.63. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAVVERITEL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to KAVVERITEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check KAVVERITEL.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs MRO-TEK.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, MRO-TEK.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while MRO-TEK.NS trades at ₹61.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas MRO-TEK.NS's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MRO-TEK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to MRO-TEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check MRO-TEK.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs SMARTLINK.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, SMARTLINK.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while SMARTLINK.NS trades at ₹115.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SMARTLINK.NS's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMARTLINK.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to SMARTLINK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check SMARTLINK.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs SMARTLINK.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, SMARTLINK.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while SMARTLINK.BO trades at ₹114.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SMARTLINK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMARTLINK.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is less volatile compared to SMARTLINK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check SMARTLINK.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs MRO-TEK.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, MRO-TEK.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while MRO-TEK.BO trades at ₹61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas MRO-TEK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MRO-TEK.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to MRO-TEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check MRO-TEK.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs PTIL.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, PTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while PTIL.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.84. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PTIL.BO's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to PTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check PTIL.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs AKSHOPTFBR.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, AKSHOPTFBR.BO has a market cap of 717.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while AKSHOPTFBR.BO trades at ₹4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas AKSHOPTFBR.BO's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKSHOPTFBR.BO's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to AKSHOPTFBR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check AKSHOPTFBR.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs AKSHOPTFBR.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, AKSHOPTFBR.NS has a market cap of 715.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while AKSHOPTFBR.NS trades at ₹4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas AKSHOPTFBR.NS's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKSHOPTFBR.NS's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to AKSHOPTFBR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check AKSHOPTFBR.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs PUNJCOMMU.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, PUNJCOMMU.BO has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while PUNJCOMMU.BO trades at ₹49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PUNJCOMMU.BO's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PUNJCOMMU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to PUNJCOMMU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check PUNJCOMMU.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs TNTELE.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, TNTELE.BO has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while TNTELE.BO trades at ₹8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TNTELE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TNTELE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is less volatile compared to TNTELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check TNTELE.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs TNTELE.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, TNTELE.NS has a market cap of 389.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while TNTELE.NS trades at ₹8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TNTELE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TNTELE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to TNTELE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check TNTELE.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs SALORAINTL.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, SALORAINTL.BO has a market cap of 253.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while SALORAINTL.BO trades at ₹28.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SALORAINTL.BO's P/E ratio is -17.89. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SALORAINTL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to SALORAINTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check SALORAINTL.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs SHYAMTEL.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, SHYAMTEL.BO has a market cap of 100.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while SHYAMTEL.BO trades at ₹8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SHYAMTEL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHYAMTEL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to SHYAMTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check SHYAMTEL.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs SHYAMTEL.NS Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, SHYAMTEL.NS has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while SHYAMTEL.NS trades at ₹8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SHYAMTEL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHYAMTEL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to SHYAMTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check SHYAMTEL.NS's competition here
FROG.NS vs CATVISION.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, CATVISION.BO has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while CATVISION.BO trades at ₹16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CATVISION.BO's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CATVISION.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to CATVISION.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check CATVISION.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs VCU.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, VCU.BO has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while VCU.BO trades at ₹5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas VCU.BO's P/E ratio is -52.91. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VCU.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to VCU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check VCU.BO's competition here
FROG.NS vs SPAR.BO Comparison March 2026
FROG.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FROG.NS stands at 2B. In comparison, SPAR.BO has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FROG.NS is priced at ₹138.90, while SPAR.BO trades at ₹3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FROG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SPAR.BO's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, FROG.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPAR.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FROG.NS is more volatile compared to SPAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FROG.NS.Check SPAR.BO's competition here