Freight Technologies, Inc.
Freight Technologies, Inc. FRGT Peers
See (FRGT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRGT | $1.79 | +0.00% | 4.2M | 0.12 | $15.56 | N/A |
| SAP | $304.10 | +0.00% | 350.7B | 53.88 | $5.58 | +0.87% |
| CRM | $272.69 | +0.00% | 260B | 42.49 | $6.40 | +0.60% |
| INTU | $787.63 | +0.00% | 217.5B | 63.64 | $12.25 | +0.52% |
| NOW | $1,028.08 | +0.00% | 209.6B | 137.28 | $7.37 | N/A |
| UBER | $93.30 | +0.00% | 192.8B | 16.15 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $115.35 | +0.00% | 146.7B | 91.60 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $350.08 | +0.00% | 113.9B | 60.88 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $404.23 | +0.00% | 102.1B | -16.78 | -$22.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $308.15 | +0.00% | 84.5B | 78.34 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRGT vs SAP Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 350.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while SAP trades at $304.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 53.88. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs CRM Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 260B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while CRM trades at $272.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.49. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs INTU Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 217.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while INTU trades at $787.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.64. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs NOW Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 209.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while NOW trades at $1,028.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 137.28. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs UBER Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 192.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while UBER trades at $93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs SHOP Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while SHOP trades at $115.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 91.60. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs APP Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while APP trades at $350.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 60.88. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs MSTR Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while MSTR trades at $404.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.78. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs CDNS Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while CDNS trades at $308.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 78.34. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs SNOW Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while SNOW trades at $223.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -51.40. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ADSK Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ADSK trades at $309.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 66.74. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs WDAY Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while WDAY trades at $240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.17. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs TEAM Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while TEAM trades at $203.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -125.88. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs DDOG Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while DDOG trades at $134.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 281.55. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs FICO Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while FICO trades at $1,827.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 79.08. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs TTD Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while TTD trades at $71.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 89.62. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ANSS Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ANSS trades at $351.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 52.47. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs STRK Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while STRK trades at $121.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs HUBS Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while HUBS trades at $556.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1298.07. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs STRF Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while STRF trades at $113.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs TYL Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while TYL trades at $592.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 88.75. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ZM Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ZM trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs PTC Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while PTC trades at $172.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs SSNC Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while SSNC trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs GRAB Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while GRAB trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 493.00. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs GWRE Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while GWRE trades at $235.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 537.98. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs DUOL Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while DUOL trades at $410.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 199.53. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs AZPN Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs DT Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while DT trades at $55.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs BSY Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while BSY trades at $53.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 68.83. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs DOCU Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while DOCU trades at $77.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs MNDY Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while MNDY trades at $314.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 300.75. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs PAYC Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while PAYC trades at $231.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs QXO Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while QXO trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -60.51. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs MANH Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while MANH trades at $197.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs BKI Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs XM Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs CDAY Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs NICE Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while NICE trades at $168.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs PCOR Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while PCOR trades at $68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -81.05. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs PCTY Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while PCTY trades at $181.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs U Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while U trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas U's P/E ratio is -21.45. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs TTAN Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while TTAN trades at $107.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -29.37. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs DAY Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while DAY trades at $55.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 352.94. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ESTC Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ESTC trades at $84.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -80.50. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs DSGX Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while DSGX trades at $101.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.84. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs SRAD Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while SRAD trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 138.45. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs APPF Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while APPF trades at $230.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 42.80. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs NATI Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs SMAR Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs OTEX Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while OTEX trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs CVLT Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while CVLT trades at $174.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 102.09. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs GTLB Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while GTLB trades at $45.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 505.67. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs LYFT Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while LYFT trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 107.93. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs CWAN Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while CWAN trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs COUP Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs BULL Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while BULL trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs QTWO Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while QTWO trades at $93.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -272.43. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs IDCC Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while IDCC trades at $224.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs VERX Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while VERX trades at $35.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -122.00. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs LIF Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while LIF trades at $65.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 495.23. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs FROG Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while FROG trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.01. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ETWO-WT Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs BILL Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while BILL trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2302.50. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs DAVEW Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while DAVEW trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -8.35. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs PEGA Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while PEGA trades at $54.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs FRSH Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while FRSH trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -63.25. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs GRND Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while GRND trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -36.43. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs RUMBW Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while RUMBW trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs SOUN Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while SOUN trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs CVT Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs PYCR Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs RIOT Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while RIOT trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs RUM Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while RUM trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs INTA Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while INTA trades at $51.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -203.42. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs WK Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while WK trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs PWSC Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ZI Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs BL Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while BL trades at $56.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ZETA Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ZETA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -60.54. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs AYX Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ENV Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs DAVE Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while DAVE trades at $268.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 73.02. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs INST Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs CALX Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while CALX trades at $53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -100.79. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs KC Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while KC trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs COMP Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while COMP trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.73. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs AGYS Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while AGYS trades at $114.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 140.48. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ASAN Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ASAN trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs NCNO Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while NCNO trades at $27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -110.88. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs BLKB Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while BLKB trades at $64.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs BRZE Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while BRZE trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -27.89. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs CLSK Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while CLSK trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ALIT Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ALIT trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -96.50. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ALKT Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ALKT trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -79.86. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs GBTG Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while GBTG trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -63.50. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs ALRM Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while ALRM trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs PAR Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while PAR trades at $69.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.19. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.
FRGT vs RNG Comparison
FRGT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGT stands at 4.2M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGT is priced at $1.79, while RNG trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -67.98. In terms of profitability, FRGT's ROE is -1.54%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGT is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGT.