Forestar Group Inc.

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEPH has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while BEPH trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas BEPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEPH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to BEPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check BEPH's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEPI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while BEPI trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas BEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to BEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check BEPI's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTMX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while VTMX trades at $34.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas VTMX's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VTMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to VTMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check VTMX's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LSEA has a market cap of 411.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while LSEA trades at $11.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas LSEA's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to LSEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LSEA's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FPH has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while FPH trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas FPH's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FPH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to FPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check FPH's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARL has a market cap of 250.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while ARL trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas ARL's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to ARL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check ARL's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMBR has a market cap of 221.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while AMBR trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas AMBR's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMBR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to AMBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AMBR's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OZ has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while OZ trades at $54.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas OZ's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to OZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check OZ's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HGSH has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while HGSH trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas HGSH's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGSH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HGSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HGSH's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AXR has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while AXR trades at $28.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas AXR's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to AXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AXR's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SDHC has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while SDHC trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas SDHC's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDHC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SDHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SDHC's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JFB has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while JFB trades at $6.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas JFB's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JFB's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to JFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check JFB's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AEI has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while AEI trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas AEI's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to AEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AEI's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MRNO has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while MRNO trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas MRNO's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRNO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to MRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check MRNO's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGDVV has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while SGDVV trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas SGDVV's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGDVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SGDVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SGDVV's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LRE has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while LRE trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas LRE's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to LRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LRE's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XIN has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while XIN trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas XIN's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XIN's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to XIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check XIN's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LSEAW has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while LSEAW trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas LSEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSEAW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to LSEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LSEAW's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GGE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while GGE trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas GGE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGE's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to GGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check GGE's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RENX has a market cap of 790.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while RENX trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas RENX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RENX's ROE of -8.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to RENX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check RENX's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HCDIP has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while HCDIP trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas HCDIP's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCDIP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIP's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HCDIZ has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while HCDIZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas HCDIZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCDIZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIZ's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HCDIW has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while HCDIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas HCDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCDIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIW's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HCDI has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while HCDI trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas HCDI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCDI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDI's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGD has a market cap of 340K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $24.84, while SGD trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas SGD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGD's ROE of -8.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SGD's competition here