First Northwest Bancorp
First Northwest Bancorp FNWB Peers
See (FNWB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNWB | $7.53 | -2.46% | 71.1M | -4.14 | -$1.82 | +3.60% |
| HDB | $74.61 | +0.28% | 190.5B | 22.96 | $3.25 | +0.79% |
| PNC | $177.45 | +1.24% | 70.2B | 12.54 | $14.15 | +3.60% |
| USB-PA | $843.00 | N/A | 69B | 240.17 | $3.51 | +4.60% |
| MFG | $5.45 | -0.73% | 68.4B | 11.12 | $0.49 | +1.18% |
| ITUB | $6.64 | -0.67% | 67.8B | 9.35 | $0.71 | +6.95% |
| USB-PS | $18.47 | +0.40% | 67.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.60% |
| USB-PP | $22.51 | +0.10% | 67.5B | 4.85 | $4.64 | +4.60% |
| USB | $43.29 | +0.05% | 67.4B | 10.66 | $4.06 | +4.60% |
| USB-PH | $20.28 | +0.20% | 66.6B | 4.37 | $4.64 | +4.60% |
Stock Comparison
FNWB vs HDB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 190.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while HDB trades at $74.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs PNC Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while PNC trades at $177.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs USB-PA Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while USB-PA trades at $843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 240.17. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs MFG Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while MFG trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs ITUB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while ITUB trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs USB-PS Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while USB-PS trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs USB-PP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while USB-PP trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs USB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while USB trades at $43.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs USB-PH Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while USB-PH trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs LYG Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while LYG trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs IBN Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while IBN trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs DB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while DB trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs TFC Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while TFC trades at $40.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -211.87. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BSBR Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BSBR trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs HBANL Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while HBANL trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs HBANM Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while HBANM trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BBDO Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BBDO trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BBD Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BBD trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs MTB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while MTB trades at $185.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs KB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while KB trades at $78.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs TFC-PO Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while TFC-PO trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs TFC-PI Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while TFC-PI trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FITB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FITB trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs HBANP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while HBANP trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FCNCO Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FCNCO trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs USB-PR Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while USB-PR trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FCNCP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FCNCP trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs TFC-PR Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while TFC-PR trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FCNCA Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FCNCA trades at $1,870.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs USB-PQ Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while USB-PQ trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs HBAN Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while HBAN trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs RF-PF Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while RF-PF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs SHG Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while SHG trades at $43.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs RF Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while RF trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs RF-PC Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while RF-PC trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CFG Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CFG trades at $41.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs KEY Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while KEY trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -85.00. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs KEY-PK Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while KEY-PK trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs KEY-PJ Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs KEY-PI Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while KEY-PI trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BAP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BAP trades at $218.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs KEY-PL Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while KEY-PL trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FITBI Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FITBI trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FITBP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FITBP trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs RF-PE Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while RF-PE trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CFG-PD Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BCH Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BCH trades at $29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs VLYPN Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while VLYPN trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FITBO Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FITBO trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FHN-PB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FHN-PB trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FHN-PC Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FHN-PC trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CFG-PH Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CFG-PH trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FHN-PE Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FHN-PE trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs WF Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while WF trades at $46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BSAC Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BSAC trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CIB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CIB trades at $43.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FHN Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FHN trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FHN-PD Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FHN-PF Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FHN-PF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs WBS Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while WBS trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs SSB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while SSB trades at $85.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs GGAL Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while GGAL trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CUBI-PE Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CUBI-PE trades at $259.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CFG-PE Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CFG-PE trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs PNFP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while PNFP trades at $104.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CBSH Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CBSH trades at $60.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs WAL Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while WAL trades at $73.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs WTFC Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while WTFC trades at $120.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CFR Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CFR trades at $124.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs WTFCM Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while WTFCM trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs UMBF Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while UMBF trades at $100.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs ONBPO Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while ONBPO trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs ONBPP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while ONBPP trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs ONB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while ONB trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CMA Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CMA trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BSMX Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs ZION Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while ZION trades at $48.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BPOP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BPOP trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs SNV Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while SNV trades at $48.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs SNV-PD Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while SNV-PD trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs PB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while PB trades at $67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BOKF Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BOKF trades at $92.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs CADE Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while CADE trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs HOMB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while HOMB trades at $27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BXS Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs OZK Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while OZK trades at $45.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FNB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FNB trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FFIN Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FFIN trades at $34.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs VLYPP Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while VLYPP trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs UBSI Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while UBSI trades at $34.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs VLY Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while VLY trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs FLG Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while FLG trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs VLYPO Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while VLYPO trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs HWCPZ Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while HWCPZ trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs COLB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while COLB trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs HWC Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while HWC trades at $53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs GBCI Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while GBCI trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs BMA Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while BMA trades at $70.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is -84.83. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is more volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.
FNWB vs NYCB Comparison
FNWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNWB stands at 71.1M. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNWB is priced at $7.53, while NYCB trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNWB currently has a P/E ratio of -4.14, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FNWB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNWB is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNWB.