Franco-Nevada Corporation
Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV | $251.87 | -4.41% | 48.5B | 52.68 | $4.78 | +0.63% |
| NEM | $109.58 | -4.28% | 119.6B | 17.17 | $6.38 | +0.92% |
| AEM | $207.54 | -4.90% | 103.9B | 23.87 | $8.69 | +0.79% |
| B | $42.34 | -4.83% | 70.9B | 14.44 | $2.93 | +1.99% |
| WPM | $139.87 | -4.02% | 63.5B | 63.57 | $2.20 | +0.47% |
| AU | $94.89 | -9.37% | 47.9B | 17.73 | $5.35 | +4.47% |
| GFI | $45.54 | -10.62% | 40.7B | 11.55 | $3.94 | +4.03% |
| KGC | $30.57 | -6.00% | 36.9B | 15.68 | $1.95 | +0.44% |
| HL-PB | $68.11 | -6.57% | 32.7B | 2270.33 | $0.03 | +0.08% |
| AGI | $45.85 | -5.50% | 19.2B | 21.83 | $2.10 | +0.25% |
Stock Comparison
FNV vs NEM Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while NEM trades at $109.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NEM's competition here
FNV vs AEM Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while AEM trades at $207.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AEM's competition here
FNV vs B Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while B trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas B's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to B's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check B's competition here
FNV vs WPM Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while WPM trades at $139.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check WPM's competition here
FNV vs AU Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while AU trades at $94.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AU's competition here
FNV vs GFI Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while GFI trades at $45.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GFI's competition here
FNV vs KGC Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while KGC trades at $30.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check KGC's competition here
FNV vs HL-PB Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while HL-PB trades at $68.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 2270.33. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HL-PB's competition here
FNV vs AGI Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while AGI trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AGI's competition here
FNV vs RGLD Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while RGLD trades at $259.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check RGLD's competition here
FNV vs HL Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while HL trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HL's competition here
FNV vs CDE Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while CDE trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CDE's competition here
FNV vs IAG Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while IAG trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IAG's competition here
FNV vs EQX Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while EQX trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is -485.33. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check EQX's competition here
FNV vs HMY Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while HMY trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HMY's competition here
FNV vs SBSW Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while SBSW trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -27.92. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SBSW's competition here
FNV vs NGD Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while NGD trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NGD's competition here
FNV vs OR Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while OR trades at $40.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check OR's competition here
FNV vs EGO Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while EGO trades at $36.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check EGO's competition here
FNV vs BTG Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while BTG trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BTG's competition here
FNV vs SSRM Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while SSRM trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SSRM's competition here
FNV vs AUY Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AUY's competition here
FNV vs ORLA Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while ORLA trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 102.13. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ORLA's competition here
FNV vs FSAGX Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, FSAGX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while FSAGX trades at $65.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas FSAGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FSAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to FSAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check FSAGX's competition here
FNV vs NG Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while NG trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NG's competition here
FNV vs ARMN Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while ARMN trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 81.93. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ARMN's competition here
FNV vs AAUC Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while AAUC trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -110.93. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AAUC's competition here
FNV vs SAND Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SAND's competition here
FNV vs CGAU Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while CGAU trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CGAU's competition here
FNV vs HYMC Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while HYMC trades at $37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -40.35. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYMC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMC's competition here
FNV vs SA Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while SA trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -78.40. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SA's competition here
FNV vs DRD Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while DRD trades at $30.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DRD's competition here
FNV vs IAUX Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while IAUX trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IAUX's competition here
FNV vs DC Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 709.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while DC trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -22.08. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DC's competition here
FNV vs GAU Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 656M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while GAU trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GAU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GAU's competition here
FNV vs NFGC Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 567M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while NFGC trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NFGC's competition here
FNV vs IDR Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 549.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while IDR trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 48.96. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IDR's competition here
FNV vs ODV Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 542.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while ODV trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ODV's competition here
FNV vs THM Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 529.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while THM trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -85.17. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check THM's competition here
FNV vs CMCL Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 485.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while CMCL trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CMCL's competition here
FNV vs NVAWW Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while NVAWW trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NVAWW's competition here
FNV vs TRX Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while TRX trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -159.50. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check TRX's competition here
FNV vs GSS Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GSS's competition here
FNV vs DC-WT Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while DC-WT trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DC-WT's competition here
FNV vs GLDG Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 297.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while GLDG trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -27.80. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GLDG's competition here
FNV vs CTGO Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 286.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while CTGO trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is 123.37. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CTGO's competition here
FNV vs USAU Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while USAU trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check USAU's competition here
FNV vs VGZ Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while VGZ trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check VGZ's competition here
FNV vs MINE Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 229.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while MINE trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check MINE's competition here
FNV vs PZG Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while PZG trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check PZG's competition here
FNV vs GORO Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while GORO trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GORO's competition here
FNV vs GSV Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GSV's competition here
FNV vs NAMM Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while NAMM trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NAMM's competition here
FNV vs BGL Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while BGL trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BGL's competition here
FNV vs ODVWZ Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while ODVWZ trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ODVWZ's competition here
FNV vs AAU Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AAU's competition here
FNV vs AUST Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while AUST trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AUST's competition here
FNV vs NAMMW Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while NAMMW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NAMMW's competition here
FNV vs BGLWW Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while BGLWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BGLWW's competition here
FNV vs HYMCZ Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCZ's competition here
FNV vs HYMCL Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCL's competition here
FNV vs HYMCW Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCW's competition here
FNV vs PVG Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check PVG's competition here
FNV vs KL Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check KL's competition here
FNV vs GPL Comparison March 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $251.87, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 52.68, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GPL's competition here