Franco-Nevada Corporation
Franco-Nevada Corporation FNV Peers
See (FNV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV | $160.57 | +3.00% | 30.9B | 50.04 | $3.21 | +0.92% |
| NEM | $61.70 | +3.07% | 68.7B | 14.06 | $4.39 | +1.62% |
| AEM | $128.62 | +4.85% | 65B | 27.36 | $4.70 | +1.24% |
| WPM | $95.72 | +4.72% | 43.4B | 70.36 | $1.36 | +0.50% |
| GOLD | $21.16 | +1.37% | 36.4B | 16.03 | $1.32 | +1.89% |
| AU | $51.93 | +2.59% | 26.1B | 17.91 | $2.90 | +0.67% |
| GFI | $25.79 | +1.40% | 23.1B | 18.70 | $1.38 | +2.10% |
| KGC | $16.40 | +3.02% | 20.1B | 16.74 | $0.98 | +0.73% |
| AGI | $26.38 | +2.57% | 11.1B | 42.53 | $0.62 | +0.38% |
| RGLD | $158.09 | +0.39% | 10.4B | 26.18 | $6.04 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
FNV vs NEM Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while NEM trades at $61.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs AEM Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while AEM trades at $128.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs WPM Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while WPM trades at $95.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 70.36. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs GOLD Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while GOLD trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs AU Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while AU trades at $51.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs GFI Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while GFI trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs KGC Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while KGC trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs AGI Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while AGI trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 42.53. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs RGLD Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while RGLD trades at $158.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs HMY Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while HMY trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs SBSW Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while SBSW trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs CDE Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while CDE trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 33.05. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs AUY Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs OR Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while OR trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 168.62. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs EQX Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while EQX trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs BTG Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while BTG trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs EGO Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while EGO trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs IAG Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while IAG trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs ORLA Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while ORLA trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 46.69. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs HL Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while HL trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 52.54. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs HL-PB Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while HL-PB trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1703.33. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs NGD Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while NGD trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs SAND Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while SAND trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 97.35. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs SSRM Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while SSRM trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs NG Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while NG trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NG's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs SA Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while SA trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -154.73. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs CGAU Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while CGAU trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs ARMN Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while ARMN trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 46.19. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs DRD Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while DRD trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs CNL Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 840.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while CNL trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -19.81. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs IAUX Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 532.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while IAUX trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs DC Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 486.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while DC trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs GSS Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs CMCL Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 440.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while CMCL trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs NFGC Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 404.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while NFGC trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs GAU Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 391.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while GAU trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -21.71. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs ODV Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 338.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while ODV trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs IDR Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while IDR trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs CTGO Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while CTGO trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs DC-WT Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while DC-WT trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs THM Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while THM trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs HYMCL Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while HYMCL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs GLDG Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while GLDG trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs USAU Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while USAU trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs HYMC Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while HYMC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs GSV Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs VGZ Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while VGZ trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs TRX Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while TRX trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs GORO Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while GORO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs NVAWW Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while NVAWW trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs PZG Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while PZG trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs AAU Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs ODVWZ Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while ODVWZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs AUST Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while AUST trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs HYMCW Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs KL Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs HYMCZ Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs GPL Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.
FNV vs PVG Comparison
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 30.9B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $160.57, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 50.04, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.