Franco-Nevada Corporation
Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV | $270.88 | +4.02% | 52.2B | 56.76 | $4.77 | +0.56% |
| NEM | $124.25 | +1.74% | 135.6B | 19.36 | $6.42 | +0.81% |
| AEM | $240.49 | +5.36% | 120.5B | 27.14 | $8.86 | +0.67% |
| B | $49.22 | +2.63% | 82.5B | 16.81 | $2.93 | +1.07% |
| WPM | $155.86 | +3.64% | 70.8B | 70.86 | $2.20 | +0.43% |
| AU | $121.12 | +6.01% | 61.2B | 22.65 | $5.35 | +2.08% |
| GFI | $56.98 | +5.34% | 51B | 27.27 | $2.09 | +1.23% |
| KGC | $35.53 | +6.22% | 43.4B | 24.84 | $1.43 | +0.35% |
| HL-PB | $78.50 | +4.68% | 37.7B | 2616.67 | $0.03 | +0.06% |
| AGI | $49.70 | +3.89% | 20.9B | 38.84 | $1.28 | +0.20% |
Stock Comparison
FNV vs NEM Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 135.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while NEM trades at $124.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NEM's competition here
FNV vs AEM Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while AEM trades at $240.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AEM's competition here
FNV vs B Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while B trades at $49.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to B's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check B's competition here
FNV vs WPM Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while WPM trades at $155.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 70.86. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check WPM's competition here
FNV vs AU Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while AU trades at $121.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AU's competition here
FNV vs GFI Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while GFI trades at $56.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GFI's competition here
FNV vs KGC Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while KGC trades at $35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check KGC's competition here
FNV vs HL-PB Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while HL-PB trades at $78.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 2616.67. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HL-PB's competition here
FNV vs AGI Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while AGI trades at $49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AGI's competition here
FNV vs RGLD Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while RGLD trades at $285.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check RGLD's competition here
FNV vs HL Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while HL trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 77.40. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HL's competition here
FNV vs CDE Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while CDE trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CDE's competition here
FNV vs EQX Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while EQX trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 178.70. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check EQX's competition here
FNV vs HMY Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while HMY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HMY's competition here
FNV vs IAG Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while IAG trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IAG's competition here
FNV vs SBSW Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while SBSW trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -50.57. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SBSW's competition here
FNV vs NGD Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while NGD trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NGD's competition here
FNV vs EGO Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while EGO trades at $43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check EGO's competition here
FNV vs OR Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while OR trades at $44.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 57.35. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check OR's competition here
FNV vs BTG Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while BTG trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BTG's competition here
FNV vs ORLA Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while ORLA trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 120.18. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ORLA's competition here
FNV vs SSRM Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while SSRM trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SSRM's competition here
FNV vs AUY Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AUY's competition here
FNV vs NG Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while NG trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -44.08. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NG's competition here
FNV vs ARMN Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while ARMN trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ARMN's competition here
FNV vs AAUC Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while AAUC trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -111.64. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AAUC's competition here
FNV vs SA Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while SA trades at $36.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -91.05. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SA's competition here
FNV vs CGAU Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while CGAU trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CGAU's competition here
FNV vs SAND Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SAND's competition here
FNV vs HYMC Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while HYMC trades at $42.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -27.31. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMC's competition here
FNV vs DRD Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while DRD trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DRD's competition here
FNV vs IAUX Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while IAUX trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IAUX's competition here
FNV vs GAU Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 810.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while GAU trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -28.36. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GAU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GAU's competition here
FNV vs DC Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 720.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while DC trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -25.44. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DC's competition here
FNV vs NFGC Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 681.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while NFGC trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -17.34. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NFGC's competition here
FNV vs IDR Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 598.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while IDR trades at $38.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 52.58. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IDR's competition here
FNV vs CMCL Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 595.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while CMCL trades at $30.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CMCL's competition here
FNV vs NVAWW Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 579.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while NVAWW trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NVAWW's competition here
FNV vs ODV Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 564.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while ODV trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ODV's competition here
FNV vs THM Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 542.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while THM trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -96.33. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check THM's competition here
FNV vs TRX Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 533.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while TRX trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -186.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check TRX's competition here
FNV vs DC-WT Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while DC-WT trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DC-WT's competition here
FNV vs GSS Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GSS's competition here
FNV vs VGZ Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 373.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while VGZ trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -42.29. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check VGZ's competition here
FNV vs CTGO Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 354M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while CTGO trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is 152.58. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CTGO's competition here
FNV vs GLDG Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 340.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while GLDG trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GLDG's competition here
FNV vs USAU Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 304.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while USAU trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check USAU's competition here
FNV vs MINE Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 279.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while MINE trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -34.92. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check MINE's competition here
FNV vs PZG Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 212.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while PZG trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check PZG's competition here
FNV vs NAMM Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while NAMM trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NAMM's competition here
FNV vs GORO Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 189.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while GORO trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GORO's competition here
FNV vs GSV Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GSV's competition here
FNV vs BGL Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while BGL trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BGL's competition here
FNV vs ODVWZ Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while ODVWZ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ODVWZ's competition here
FNV vs AUST Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while AUST trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -16.38. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AUST's competition here
FNV vs AAU Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AAU's competition here
FNV vs BGLWW Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while BGLWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BGLWW's competition here
FNV vs NAMMW Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while NAMMW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NAMMW's competition here
FNV vs HYMCZ Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCZ's competition here
FNV vs HYMCL Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCL's competition here
FNV vs HYMCW Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCW's competition here
FNV vs GPL Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GPL's competition here
FNV vs KL Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check KL's competition here
FNV vs PVG Comparison February 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 52.2B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $270.88, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 56.76, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check PVG's competition here