Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMS | $22.66 | +0.00% | 13.2B | 15.74 | $1.44 | +3.47% |
| HCA | $526.52 | +0.00% | 120.9B | 19.08 | $28.32 | +0.53% |
| THC | $237.58 | +0.00% | 20.8B | 15.29 | $15.50 | N/A |
| UHS | $229.98 | +0.00% | 14.9B | 10.97 | $21.02 | +0.34% |
| SOLV | $73.42 | +0.00% | 13B | 8.62 | $8.71 | N/A |
| ENSG | $212.39 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 36.68 | $5.83 | +0.12% |
| EHC | $104.84 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 19.13 | $5.55 | +0.68% |
| DVA | $150.91 | +0.00% | 10B | 15.72 | $9.51 | N/A |
| OSH | $39.00 | +0.08% | 9.5B | -17.65 | -$2.21 | N/A |
| CHE | $468.32 | +0.00% | 6.8B | 24.66 | $18.92 | +0.49% |
Stock Comparison
FMS vs HCA Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HCA has a market cap of 120.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while HCA trades at $526.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas HCA's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCA's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to HCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check HCA's competition here
FMS vs THC Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, THC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while THC trades at $237.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas THC's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to THC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check THC's competition here
FMS vs UHS Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, UHS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while UHS trades at $229.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas UHS's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UHS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to UHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check UHS's competition here
FMS vs SOLV Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SOLV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while SOLV trades at $73.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SOLV's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOLV's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to SOLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check SOLV's competition here
FMS vs ENSG Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ENSG has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while ENSG trades at $212.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ENSG's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENSG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to ENSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check ENSG's competition here
FMS vs EHC Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, EHC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while EHC trades at $104.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas EHC's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to EHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check EHC's competition here
FMS vs DVA Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DVA has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while DVA trades at $150.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DVA's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DVA's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to DVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check DVA's competition here
FMS vs OSH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, OSH has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while OSH trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas OSH's P/E ratio is -17.65. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSH's ROE of +4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to OSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check OSH's competition here
FMS vs CHE Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CHE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while CHE trades at $468.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CHE's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to CHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check CHE's competition here
FMS vs OPCH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, OPCH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while OPCH trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas OPCH's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPCH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to OPCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check OPCH's competition here
FMS vs LHCG Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LHCG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while LHCG trades at $169.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas LHCG's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LHCG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to LHCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check LHCG's competition here
FMS vs BKD Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BKD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while BKD trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKD's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BKD's ROE of -5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to BKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check BKD's competition here
FMS vs AMED Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AMED has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AMED trades at $100.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AMED's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMED's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to AMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AMED's competition here
FMS vs LFST Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LFST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while LFST trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas LFST's P/E ratio is -247.00. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to LFST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check LFST's competition here
FMS vs NHC Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NHC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while NHC trades at $157.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NHC's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NHC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to NHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check NHC's competition here
FMS vs SGRY Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SGRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while SGRY trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SGRY's P/E ratio is -11.39. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGRY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to SGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check SGRY's competition here
FMS vs ADUS Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ADUS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while ADUS trades at $105.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ADUS's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADUS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to ADUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check ADUS's competition here
FMS vs ACHC Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ACHC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while ACHC trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ACHC's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACHC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to ACHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check ACHC's competition here
FMS vs SEM Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SEM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while SEM trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SEM's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to SEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check SEM's competition here
FMS vs AMEH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AMEH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AMEH trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AMEH's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMEH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to AMEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AMEH's competition here
FMS vs MD Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while MD trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MD's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to MD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check MD's competition here
FMS vs HCSG Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HCSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while HCSG trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas HCSG's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCSG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to HCSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check HCSG's competition here
FMS vs AVAH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AVAH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AVAH trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AVAH's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVAH's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to AVAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AVAH's competition here
FMS vs ARDT Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ARDT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while ARDT trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ARDT's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARDT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to ARDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check ARDT's competition here
FMS vs USPH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, USPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while USPH trades at $82.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas USPH's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USPH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to USPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check USPH's competition here
FMS vs BKDT Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BKDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while BKDT trades at $77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BKDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BKDT's ROE of -5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to BKDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check BKDT's competition here
FMS vs INNV Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, INNV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while INNV trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas INNV's P/E ratio is 178.00. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INNV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to INNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check INNV's competition here
FMS vs PNTG Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PNTG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while PNTG trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PNTG's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to PNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check PNTG's competition here
FMS vs ASTH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ASTH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while ASTH trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ASTH's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to ASTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check ASTH's competition here
FMS vs FSHCX Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FSHCX has a market cap of 808M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while FSHCX trades at $98.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FSHCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to FSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check FSHCX's competition here
FMS vs AMN Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AMN has a market cap of 768.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AMN trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AMN's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to AMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AMN's competition here
FMS vs TALK Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TALK has a market cap of 760.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while TALK trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TALK's P/E ratio is 151.33. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TALK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to TALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check TALK's competition here
FMS vs CMPS Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CMPS has a market cap of 714.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while CMPS trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CMPS's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMPS's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to CMPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check CMPS's competition here
FMS vs EHAB Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, EHAB has a market cap of 688.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while EHAB trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas EHAB's P/E ratio is -56.62. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EHAB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to EHAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check EHAB's competition here
FMS vs SNDA Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SNDA has a market cap of 661.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while SNDA trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SNDA's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNDA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to SNDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check SNDA's competition here
FMS vs CYH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CYH has a market cap of 504.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while CYH trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CYH's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to CYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check CYH's competition here
FMS vs MCTA Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MCTA has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while MCTA trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MCTA's P/E ratio is 419.36. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCTA's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to MCTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check MCTA's competition here
FMS vs AUNA Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AUNA has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AUNA trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AUNA's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to AUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AUNA's competition here
FMS vs AONC Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AONC has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AONC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AONC's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AONC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to AONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AONC's competition here
FMS vs CCRN Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CCRN has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while CCRN trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CCRN's P/E ratio is -18.22. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to CCRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check CCRN's competition here
FMS vs TOI Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TOI has a market cap of 281.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while TOI trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TOI's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOI's ROE of +21.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to TOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check TOI's competition here
FMS vs CSU Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CSU has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while CSU trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CSU's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CSU's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to CSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check CSU's competition here
FMS vs AGL Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AGL has a market cap of 210.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AGL trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AGL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGL's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to AGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AGL's competition here
FMS vs JYNT Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, JYNT has a market cap of 140.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while JYNT trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas JYNT's P/E ratio is -928.00. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JYNT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to JYNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check JYNT's competition here
FMS vs NAKAW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NAKAW has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while NAKAW trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NAKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAKAW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to NAKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check NAKAW's competition here
FMS vs AIRS Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AIRS has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AIRS trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AIRS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIRS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to AIRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AIRS's competition here
FMS vs BTMD Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BTMD has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while BTMD trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BTMD's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTMD's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to BTMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check BTMD's competition here
FMS vs FVE Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FVE has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while FVE trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FVE's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to FVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check FVE's competition here
FMS vs KDLYW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KDLYW has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while KDLYW trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas KDLYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KDLYW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to KDLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check KDLYW's competition here
FMS vs DCGO Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DCGO has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while DCGO trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DCGO's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to DCGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check DCGO's competition here
FMS vs ALR Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ALR has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while ALR trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ALR's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to ALR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check ALR's competition here
FMS vs IMAC Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IMAC has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while IMAC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas IMAC's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMAC's ROE of +1183.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to IMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check IMAC's competition here
FMS vs CCEL Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CCEL has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while CCEL trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CCEL's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCEL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to CCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check CCEL's competition here
FMS vs AIH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AIH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AIH trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AIH's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIH's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to AIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AIH's competition here
FMS vs AMS Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AMS has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while AMS trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AMS's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to AMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check AMS's competition here
FMS vs CANO Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CANO has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while CANO trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CANO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CANO's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to CANO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check CANO's competition here
FMS vs FTRP Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FTRP has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while FTRP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FTRP's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTRP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to FTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check FTRP's competition here
FMS vs TOIIW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TOIIW has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while TOIIW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TOIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOIIW's ROE of +21.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to TOIIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check TOIIW's competition here
FMS vs PIII Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PIII has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while PIII trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PIII's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIII's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to PIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check PIII's competition here
FMS vs MODV Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MODV has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while MODV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MODV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MODV's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to MODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check MODV's competition here
FMS vs GBNH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GBNH has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while GBNH trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GBNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBNH's ROE of +15.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to GBNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check GBNH's competition here
FMS vs RHE-PA Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RHE-PA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while RHE-PA trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas RHE-PA's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RHE-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to RHE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check RHE-PA's competition here
FMS vs RHE Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RHE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while RHE trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas RHE's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RHE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to RHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check RHE's competition here
FMS vs ATIP Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ATIP has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while ATIP trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ATIP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATIP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to ATIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check ATIP's competition here
FMS vs TALKW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TALKW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while TALKW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TALKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TALKW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to TALKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check TALKW's competition here
FMS vs IMACW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IMACW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while IMACW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas IMACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMACW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to IMACW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check IMACW's competition here
FMS vs SYRA Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SYRA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while SYRA trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SYRA's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYRA's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to SYRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check SYRA's competition here
FMS vs MNDR Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MNDR has a market cap of 823.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while MNDR trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MNDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNDR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to MNDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check MNDR's competition here
FMS vs CCM Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CCM has a market cap of 528.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while CCM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CCM's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to CCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check CCM's competition here
FMS vs BACK Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BACK has a market cap of 212.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while BACK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BACK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BACK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to BACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check BACK's competition here
FMS vs NVOS Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NVOS has a market cap of 61.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while NVOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NVOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVOS's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to NVOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check NVOS's competition here
FMS vs NIVFW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NIVFW has a market cap of 35.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while NIVFW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NIVFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIVFW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to NIVFW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check NIVFW's competition here
FMS vs PIIIW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PIIIW has a market cap of 19.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while PIIIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PIIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIIIW's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to PIIIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check PIIIW's competition here
FMS vs IONM Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IONM has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while IONM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas IONM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IONM's ROE of +5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to IONM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check IONM's competition here
FMS vs TVTY Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TVTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while TVTY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TVTY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TVTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to TVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check TVTY's competition here
FMS vs DCGOW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DCGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while DCGOW trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DCGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCGOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to DCGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check DCGOW's competition here
FMS vs TLMDW Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TLMDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while TLMDW trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TLMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TLMDW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to TLMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check TLMDW's competition here
FMS vs TLMD Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TLMD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while TLMD trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TLMD's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TLMD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to TLMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check TLMD's competition here
FMS vs SLHGP Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SLHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while SLHGP trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SLHGP's P/E ratio is -30.38. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLHGP's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to SLHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check SLHGP's competition here
FMS vs NFH Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NFH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while NFH trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NFH's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to NFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check NFH's competition here
FMS vs HNGR Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HNGR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while HNGR trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas HNGR's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HNGR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to HNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check HNGR's competition here
FMS vs DVCR Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DVCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while DVCR trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DVCR's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DVCR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is more volatile compared to DVCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check DVCR's competition here
FMS vs SLHG Comparison February 2026
FMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMS stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SLHG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMS is priced at $22.66, while SLHG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SLHG's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, FMS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMS is less volatile compared to SLHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMS.Check SLHG's competition here