Flora Textiles Ltd.

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, RNBDENIMS.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while RNBDENIMS.BO trades at ₹199.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RNBDENIMS.BO's P/E ratio is 65.34. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNBDENIMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to RNBDENIMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check RNBDENIMS.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, NIBE.BO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while NIBE.BO trades at ₹1,008.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NIBE.BO's P/E ratio is -215.18. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NIBE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to NIBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check NIBE.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, MAFATIND.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while MAFATIND.BO trades at ₹128.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MAFATIND.BO's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAFATIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to MAFATIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check MAFATIND.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, VTMLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while VTMLTD.BO trades at ₹78.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas VTMLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 36.77. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTMLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to VTMLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check VTMLTD.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, RAJPALAYAM.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while RAJPALAYAM.BO trades at ₹803.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RAJPALAYAM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check RAJPALAYAM.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, VOITHPAPR.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while VOITHPAPR.BO trades at ₹1,566.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas VOITHPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VOITHPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to VOITHPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check VOITHPAPR.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while GLOSTERLTD.BO trades at ₹575.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLOSTERLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 82.31. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check GLOSTERLTD.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while GLOSTERLTD.NS trades at ₹575.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLOSTERLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 82.19. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check GLOSTERLTD.NS's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SHRJAGP.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SHRJAGP.BO trades at ₹608.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SHRJAGP.BO's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHRJAGP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SHRJAGP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SHRJAGP.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, LAKSHMIMIL.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while LAKSHMIMIL.BO trades at ₹7,522.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas LAKSHMIMIL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.19. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check LAKSHMIMIL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, AKSPINTEX.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while AKSPINTEX.BO trades at ₹943.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AKSPINTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 74.69. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AKSPINTEX.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to AKSPINTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check AKSPINTEX.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, RAGHUSYN.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while RAGHUSYN.BO trades at ₹111.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RAGHUSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 70.69. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAGHUSYN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to RAGHUSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check RAGHUSYN.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, MANOMAY.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while MANOMAY.NS trades at ₹218.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MANOMAY.NS's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANOMAY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to MANOMAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check MANOMAY.NS's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, HIMFIBP.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while HIMFIBP.BO trades at ₹43.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HIMFIBP.BO's P/E ratio is -118.30. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HIMFIBP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to HIMFIBP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check HIMFIBP.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while CNOVAPETRO.BO trades at ₹112.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CNOVAPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -211.51. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check CNOVAPETRO.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SUDTIND-B.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SUDTIND-B.BO trades at ₹82.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SUDTIND-B.BO's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUDTIND-B.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SUDTIND-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SUDTIND-B.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, CANDOUR.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while CANDOUR.BO trades at ₹155.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CANDOUR.BO's P/E ratio is -91.75. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CANDOUR.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to CANDOUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check CANDOUR.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ARL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ARL.BO trades at ₹131.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ARL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and ARL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, BARODARY.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while BARODARY.BO trades at ₹110.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BARODARY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BARODARY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to BARODARY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check BARODARY.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, OSIAJEE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while OSIAJEE.BO trades at ₹436.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas OSIAJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OSIAJEE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to OSIAJEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check OSIAJEE.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, LUDLOWJUT.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while LUDLOWJUT.BO trades at ₹201.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas LUDLOWJUT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check LUDLOWJUT.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, MKEXIM.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while MKEXIM.BO trades at ₹51.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MKEXIM.BO's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MKEXIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to MKEXIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check MKEXIM.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, RRIL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while RRIL.BO trades at ₹17.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RRIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to RRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check RRIL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, BTTL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while BTTL.BO trades at ₹34.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BTTL.BO's P/E ratio is -45.57. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTTL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to BTTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check BTTL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SHAHLON.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SHAHLON.BO trades at ₹23.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SHAHLON.BO's P/E ratio is 59.21. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHAHLON.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SHAHLON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SHAHLON.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, RACE.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while RACE.NS trades at ₹120.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RACE.NS's P/E ratio is 60.98. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RACE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to RACE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check RACE.NS's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, FILATFASH.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while FILATFASH.BO trades at ₹0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas FILATFASH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FILATFASH.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to FILATFASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check FILATFASH.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SUPER.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SUPER.BO trades at ₹634.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SUPER.BO's P/E ratio is 57.08. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUPER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SUPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SUPER.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, JATTAINDUS.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while JATTAINDUS.BO trades at ₹424.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas JATTAINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 1244.12. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JATTAINDUS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to JATTAINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check JATTAINDUS.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, WINSOMTX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while WINSOMTX.BO trades at ₹75.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas WINSOMTX.BO's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WINSOMTX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to WINSOMTX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check WINSOMTX.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SURYALA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SURYALA.BO trades at ₹347.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SURYALA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SURYALA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SURYALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SURYALA.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ZBINTXPP.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ZBINTXPP.BO trades at ₹1,990.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ZBINTXPP.BO's P/E ratio is 45.87. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZBINTXPP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ZBINTXPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ZBINTXPP.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, LAHOTIOV.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while LAHOTIOV.BO trades at ₹48.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas LAHOTIOV.BO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAHOTIOV.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to LAHOTIOV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check LAHOTIOV.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, PREMCO.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while PREMCO.BO trades at ₹421.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PREMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PREMCO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to PREMCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check PREMCO.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SWADPOL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SWADPOL.BO trades at ₹35.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SWADPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWADPOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SWADPOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SWADPOL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SHRIDINE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SHRIDINE.BO trades at ₹239.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SHRIDINE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHRIDINE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIDINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SHRIDINE.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, BHUDEVI.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while BHUDEVI.BO trades at ₹272.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BHUDEVI.BO's P/E ratio is -777.14. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHUDEVI.BO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and BHUDEVI.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHUDEVI.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, TTFL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while TTFL.BO trades at ₹87.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TTFL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.70. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and TTFL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTFL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, GARNETINT.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while GARNETINT.BO trades at ₹61.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GARNETINT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GARNETINT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to GARNETINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check GARNETINT.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, KGPETRO.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while KGPETRO.BO trades at ₹221.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas KGPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KGPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to KGPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check KGPETRO.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, HINDAPL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while HINDAPL.BO trades at ₹111.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HINDAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 1017.27. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HINDAPL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to HINDAPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check HINDAPL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ADDIND.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ADDIND.BO trades at ₹100.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ADDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADDIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ADDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ADDIND.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SURATRAML.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SURATRAML.BO trades at ₹4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SURATRAML.BO's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SURATRAML.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SURATRAML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SURATRAML.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, JCTLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while JCTLTD.BO trades at ₹1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas JCTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JCTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and JCTLTD.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCTLTD.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, BHILSPIN.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while BHILSPIN.BO trades at ₹114.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BHILSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -48.35. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHILSPIN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to BHILSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check BHILSPIN.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ALSTONE.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ALSTONE.BO trades at ₹0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ALSTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALSTONE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ALSTONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ALSTONE.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, AMARJOTHI.BO has a market cap of 939.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while AMARJOTHI.BO trades at ₹140.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AMARJOTHI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMARJOTHI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to AMARJOTHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check AMARJOTHI.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, DIGJAMLMTD.NS has a market cap of 931.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while DIGJAMLMTD.NS trades at ₹44.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DIGJAMLMTD.NS's P/E ratio is 58.20. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check DIGJAMLMTD.NS's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, VIPPYSP.BO has a market cap of 884.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while VIPPYSP.BO trades at ₹161.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas VIPPYSP.BO's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VIPPYSP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to VIPPYSP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check VIPPYSP.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, DEEPAKSP.BO has a market cap of 873.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while DEEPAKSP.BO trades at ₹122.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DEEPAKSP.BO's P/E ratio is 166.44. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DEEPAKSP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to DEEPAKSP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check DEEPAKSP.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, APMIN.BO has a market cap of 853.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while APMIN.BO trades at ₹38.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas APMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.63. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APMIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to APMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check APMIN.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SANTETX.BO has a market cap of 853.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SANTETX.BO trades at ₹148.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SANTETX.BO's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SANTETX.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SANTETX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SANTETX.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, AICHAMP.BO has a market cap of 844.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while AICHAMP.BO trades at ₹27.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AICHAMP.BO's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AICHAMP.BO's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to AICHAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check AICHAMP.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, CFEL.BO has a market cap of 831.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while CFEL.BO trades at ₹33.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CFEL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CFEL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to CFEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check CFEL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, INDIANACRY.BO has a market cap of 788.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while INDIANACRY.BO trades at ₹5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas INDIANACRY.BO's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDIANACRY.BO's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANACRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check INDIANACRY.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SUPTANERY.BO has a market cap of 737.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SUPTANERY.BO trades at ₹6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SUPTANERY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUPTANERY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SUPTANERY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SUPTANERY.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, RIBATEX.BO has a market cap of 709.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while RIBATEX.BO trades at ₹71.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RIBATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RIBATEX.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to RIBATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check RIBATEX.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SHUBHAM.BO has a market cap of 707.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SHUBHAM.BO trades at ₹59.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SHUBHAM.BO's P/E ratio is 95.70. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHUBHAM.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SHUBHAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SHUBHAM.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ECOHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 693.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ECOHOTELS.BO trades at ₹13.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ECOHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ECOHOTELS.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ECOHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ECOHOTELS.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ASHNOOR.BO has a market cap of 655.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ASHNOOR.BO trades at ₹43.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ASHNOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASHNOOR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ASHNOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ASHNOOR.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SHINEFASH.BO has a market cap of 646.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SHINEFASH.BO trades at ₹26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SHINEFASH.BO's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHINEFASH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SHINEFASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SHINEFASH.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SKYIND.BO has a market cap of 633.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SKYIND.BO trades at ₹79.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SKYIND.BO's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKYIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SKYIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SKYIND.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, VICTMILL.BO has a market cap of 629.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while VICTMILL.BO trades at ₹6,590.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas VICTMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VICTMILL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and VICTMILL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VICTMILL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, LAKHOTIA.BO has a market cap of 614.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while LAKHOTIA.BO trades at ₹61.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas LAKHOTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAKHOTIA.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to LAKHOTIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check LAKHOTIA.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, BETXIND.BO has a market cap of 583.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while BETXIND.BO trades at ₹378.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BETXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 46.31. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BETXIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to BETXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check BETXIND.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, MOHITE.BO has a market cap of 558.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while MOHITE.BO trades at ₹2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MOHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MOHITE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to MOHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check MOHITE.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, EVERFIN.BO has a market cap of 554.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while EVERFIN.BO trades at ₹96.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EVERFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVERFIN.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to EVERFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check EVERFIN.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ARMAN.BO has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ARMAN.BO trades at ₹113.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ARMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 651.88. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARMAN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ARMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ARMAN.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, AKI.NS has a market cap of 537.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while AKI.NS trades at ₹4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AKI.NS's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AKI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to AKI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check AKI.NS's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, DHANFAB.BO has a market cap of 530.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while DHANFAB.BO trades at ₹58.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DHANFAB.BO's P/E ratio is -36.60. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHANFAB.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to DHANFAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check DHANFAB.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, WIREFABR.BO has a market cap of 473.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while WIREFABR.BO trades at ₹147.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas WIREFABR.BO's P/E ratio is 112.32. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIREFABR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to WIREFABR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check WIREFABR.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, KAMADGIRI.BO has a market cap of 461.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while KAMADGIRI.BO trades at ₹78.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas KAMADGIRI.BO's P/E ratio is 59.15. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KAMADGIRI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to KAMADGIRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check KAMADGIRI.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, GOKAKTEX.BO has a market cap of 454.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while GOKAKTEX.BO trades at ₹71.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GOKAKTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOKAKTEX.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to GOKAKTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check GOKAKTEX.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, AREXMIS.BO has a market cap of 435.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while AREXMIS.BO trades at ₹121.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AREXMIS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AREXMIS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to AREXMIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check AREXMIS.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.NS has a market cap of 435M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while CNOVAPETRO.NS trades at ₹16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CNOVAPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check CNOVAPETRO.NS's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SAMBANDAM.BO has a market cap of 426.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SAMBANDAM.BO trades at ₹101.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SAMBANDAM.BO's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAMBANDAM.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SAMBANDAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SAMBANDAM.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, HPCOTTON.BO has a market cap of 419.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while HPCOTTON.BO trades at ₹107.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HPCOTTON.BO's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HPCOTTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to HPCOTTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check HPCOTTON.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, KGDENIM.BO has a market cap of 417.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while KGDENIM.BO trades at ₹16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas KGDENIM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KGDENIM.BO's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to KGDENIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check KGDENIM.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SREEJAYA.BO has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SREEJAYA.BO trades at ₹92.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SREEJAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -172.04. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SREEJAYA.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SREEJAYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SREEJAYA.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, TILAK.BO has a market cap of 414.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while TILAK.BO trades at ₹0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TILAK.BO's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TILAK.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to TILAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check TILAK.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, GTNINDS.BO has a market cap of 396.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while GTNINDS.BO trades at ₹22.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GTNINDS.BO's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GTNINDS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to GTNINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check GTNINDS.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, PBMPOLY.BO has a market cap of 388.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while PBMPOLY.BO trades at ₹56.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PBMPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PBMPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to PBMPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check PBMPOLY.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ANGEL.BO has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ANGEL.BO trades at ₹15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ANGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ANGEL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ANGEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ANGEL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SURYAAMBA.BO has a market cap of 374.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SURYAAMBA.BO trades at ₹126.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SURYAAMBA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SURYAAMBA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SURYAAMBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SURYAAMBA.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, JAIHINDS.BO has a market cap of 359.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while JAIHINDS.BO trades at ₹56.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas JAIHINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 2847.50. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JAIHINDS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and JAIHINDS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAIHINDS.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ANJANI.BO has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ANJANI.BO trades at ₹23.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ANJANI.BO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ANJANI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ANJANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ANJANI.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, GINISILK.BO has a market cap of 349.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while GINISILK.BO trades at ₹61.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GINISILK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GINISILK.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to GINISILK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check GINISILK.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SWASTIVI.BO has a market cap of 328.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SWASTIVI.BO trades at ₹3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SWASTIVI.BO's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWASTIVI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to SWASTIVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check SWASTIVI.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, GEMSPIN.BO has a market cap of 326.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while GEMSPIN.BO trades at ₹5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GEMSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -59.11. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEMSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and GEMSPIN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEMSPIN.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, CAMEXLTD.BO has a market cap of 316.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while CAMEXLTD.BO trades at ₹29.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CAMEXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CAMEXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to CAMEXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check CAMEXLTD.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ADITYASP.BO has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while ADITYASP.BO trades at ₹18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ADITYASP.BO's P/E ratio is -22.15. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADITYASP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to ADITYASP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check ADITYASP.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, KATRSPG.BO has a market cap of 299.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while KATRSPG.BO trades at ₹105.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas KATRSPG.BO's P/E ratio is -22.88. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KATRSPG.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and KATRSPG.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KATRSPG.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, HINDMILL.BO has a market cap of 291.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while HINDMILL.BO trades at ₹174.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HINDMILL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HINDMILL.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to HINDMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check HINDMILL.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, PASUSPG.BO has a market cap of 290.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while PASUSPG.BO trades at ₹30.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PASUSPG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PASUSPG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to PASUSPG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check PASUSPG.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, KAPILCO.BO has a market cap of 285.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while KAPILCO.BO trades at ₹148.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas KAPILCO.BO's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KAPILCO.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and KAPILCO.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAPILCO.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, PARMSILK.BO has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while PARMSILK.BO trades at ₹94.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PARMSILK.BO's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PARMSILK.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and PARMSILK.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PARMSILK.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, KHOOBSURAT.BO has a market cap of 282.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while KHOOBSURAT.BO trades at ₹0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas KHOOBSURAT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KHOOBSURAT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to KHOOBSURAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check KHOOBSURAT.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, SHANTAI.BO has a market cap of 281.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while SHANTAI.BO trades at ₹36.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SHANTAI.BO's P/E ratio is -34.09. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHANTAI.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO and SHANTAI.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHANTAI.BO's competition here

FLORATX.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLORATX.BO stands at 830.7M. In comparison, YARNSYN.BO has a market cap of 273.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLORATX.BO is priced at ₹138.45, while YARNSYN.BO trades at ₹12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLORATX.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas YARNSYN.BO's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, FLORATX.BO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YARNSYN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLORATX.BO is less volatile compared to YARNSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLORATX.BO.Check YARNSYN.BO's competition here