Standard BioTools Inc.
Standard BioTools Inc. (FLDM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLDM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Diagnostics & Research Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLDM | $3.71 | -7.02% | 294.2M | -4.74 | -$0.78 | N/A |
| DHR-PB | $1,261.26 | -0.78% | 916.8B | 146.01 | $8.64 | +0.68% |
| TMO | $464.37 | -2.42% | 172.5B | 26.16 | $17.75 | +0.38% |
| DHR | $187.32 | +0.57% | 132.5B | 37.18 | $5.04 | +0.68% |
| IDXX | $573.82 | +0.46% | 45.8B | 43.97 | $13.05 | N/A |
| A | $111.51 | -0.10% | 31.5B | 24.67 | $4.52 | +0.89% |
| IQV | $164.72 | +1.10% | 27.9B | 21.01 | $7.84 | N/A |
| NTRA | $187.85 | -1.29% | 26.6B | -123.59 | -$1.52 | N/A |
| MTD | $1,173.74 | +0.49% | 24B | 27.91 | $42.05 | N/A |
| DGX | $199.70 | -0.59% | 22.2B | 22.84 | $8.74 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
FLDM vs DHR-PB Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DHR-PB has a market cap of 916.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DHR-PB trades at $1,261.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DHR-PB's P/E ratio is 146.01. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DHR-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DHR-PB's competition here
FLDM vs TMO Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, TMO has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while TMO trades at $464.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas TMO's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to TMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check TMO's competition here
FLDM vs DHR Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DHR has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DHR trades at $187.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DHR's P/E ratio is 37.18. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DHR's competition here
FLDM vs IDXX Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, IDXX has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while IDXX trades at $573.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas IDXX's P/E ratio is 43.97. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IDXX's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to IDXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check IDXX's competition here
FLDM vs A Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, A has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while A trades at $111.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas A's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to A's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check A's competition here
FLDM vs IQV Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, IQV has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while IQV trades at $164.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas IQV's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IQV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to IQV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check IQV's competition here
FLDM vs NTRA Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NTRA has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NTRA trades at $187.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NTRA's P/E ratio is -123.59. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NTRA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to NTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NTRA's competition here
FLDM vs MTD Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MTD has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MTD trades at $1,173.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MTD's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTD's ROE of -4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MTD's competition here
FLDM vs DGX Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DGX has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DGX trades at $199.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DGX's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DGX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DGX's competition here
FLDM vs LH Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, LH has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while LH trades at $263.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas LH's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to LH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check LH's competition here
FLDM vs EXAS Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, EXAS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while EXAS trades at $103.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas EXAS's P/E ratio is -94.15. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EXAS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to EXAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check EXAS's competition here
FLDM vs ILMN Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ILMN has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ILMN trades at $118.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ILMN's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ILMN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ILMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ILMN's competition here
FLDM vs WAT Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, WAT has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while WAT trades at $286.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas WAT's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WAT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to WAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check WAT's competition here
FLDM vs PKI Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PKI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PKI trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PKI's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PKI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PKI's competition here
FLDM vs MEDP Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MEDP has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MEDP trades at $450.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MEDP's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MEDP's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MEDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MEDP's competition here
FLDM vs GH Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GH has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GH trades at $85.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GH's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GH's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GH's competition here
FLDM vs RVTY Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, RVTY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while RVTY trades at $85.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas RVTY's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RVTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to RVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check RVTY's competition here
FLDM vs QGEN Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, QGEN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while QGEN trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas QGEN's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to QGEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to QGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check QGEN's competition here
FLDM vs CRL Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CRL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CRL trades at $155.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CRL's P/E ratio is -53.48. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CRL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CRL's competition here
FLDM vs ICLR Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ICLR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ICLR trades at $98.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ICLR's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ICLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ICLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ICLR's competition here
FLDM vs RDNT Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, RDNT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while RDNT trades at $62.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas RDNT's P/E ratio is -388.06. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RDNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to RDNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check RDNT's competition here
FLDM vs SYNH Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SYNH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SYNH trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SYNH's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SYNH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to SYNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SYNH's competition here
FLDM vs SHC Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SHC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SHC trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SHC's P/E ratio is 49.69. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to SHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SHC's competition here
FLDM vs OLK Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, OLK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while OLK trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas OLK's P/E ratio is -96.59. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OLK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to OLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check OLK's competition here
FLDM vs BLLN Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BLLN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BLLN trades at $69.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BLLN's P/E ratio is 493.64. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BLLN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to BLLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BLLN's competition here
FLDM vs TWST Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, TWST has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while TWST trades at $43.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas TWST's P/E ratio is -34.08. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TWST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to TWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check TWST's competition here
FLDM vs NEOG Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NEOG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NEOG trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NEOG's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NEOG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to NEOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NEOG's competition here
FLDM vs GRAL Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GRAL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GRAL trades at $43.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GRAL's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GRAL's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GRAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GRAL's competition here
FLDM vs VIVO Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while VIVO trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VIVO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check VIVO's competition here
FLDM vs OPK Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, OPK has a market cap of 913.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while OPK trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas OPK's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OPK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to OPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check OPK's competition here
FLDM vs CDNA Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CDNA has a market cap of 874.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CDNA trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CDNA's P/E ratio is -42.52. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CDNA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CDNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CDNA's competition here
FLDM vs CSTL Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CSTL has a market cap of 759.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CSTL trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CSTL's P/E ratio is -30.80. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CSTL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CSTL's competition here
FLDM vs PSNL Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PSNL has a market cap of 596.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PSNL trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PSNL's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PSNL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PSNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PSNL's competition here
FLDM vs GRALV Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GRALV has a market cap of 579.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GRALV trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GRALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GRALV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GRALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GRALV's competition here
FLDM vs FLGT Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, FLGT has a market cap of 461.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while FLGT trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas FLGT's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FLGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to FLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check FLGT's competition here
FLDM vs MYGN Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MYGN has a market cap of 435.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MYGN trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MYGN's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MYGN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MYGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MYGN's competition here
FLDM vs ACRS Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ACRS has a market cap of 426.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ACRS trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ACRS's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ACRS's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ACRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ACRS's competition here
FLDM vs CO Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to CO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CO's competition here
FLDM vs ATLN Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ATLN has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ATLN trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ATLN's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ATLN's ROE of +6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to ATLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ATLN's competition here
FLDM vs PRE Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PRE has a market cap of 291.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PRE trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PRE's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PRE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to PRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PRE's competition here
FLDM vs OPGN Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, OPGN has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while OPGN trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas OPGN's P/E ratio is 137.50. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OPGN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to OPGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check OPGN's competition here
FLDM vs NEO Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NEO has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NEO trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NEO's P/E ratio is -9.38. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NEO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to NEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NEO's competition here
FLDM vs MDXH Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MDXH has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MDXH trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MDXH's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MDXH's ROE of +5.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MDXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MDXH's competition here
FLDM vs BDSX Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BDSX has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BDSX trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BDSX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BDSX's ROE of -17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to BDSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BDSX's competition here
FLDM vs GTH Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GTH has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GTH trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GTH's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GTH's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GTH's competition here
FLDM vs GENE Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GENE has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GENE trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GENE's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GENE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GENE's competition here
FLDM vs STIM Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, STIM has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while STIM trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas STIM's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STIM's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to STIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check STIM's competition here
FLDM vs SERA Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SERA has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SERA trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SERA's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SERA's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to SERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SERA's competition here
FLDM vs XGN Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, XGN has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while XGN trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas XGN's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to XGN's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to XGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check XGN's competition here
FLDM vs DRIO Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DRIO has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DRIO trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DRIO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DRIO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DRIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DRIO's competition here
FLDM vs PRPO Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PRPO has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PRPO trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PRPO's P/E ratio is -33.16. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PRPO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PRPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PRPO's competition here
FLDM vs STRR Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while STRR trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to STRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check STRR's competition here
FLDM vs STRRP Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while STRRP trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check STRRP's competition here
FLDM vs AKU Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, AKU has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while AKU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas AKU's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AKU's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to AKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check AKU's competition here
FLDM vs VNRX Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, VNRX has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while VNRX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas VNRX's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VNRX's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to VNRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check VNRX's competition here
FLDM vs BNR Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BNR has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BNR trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BNR's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BNR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to BNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BNR's competition here
FLDM vs CEMI Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CEMI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CEMI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CEMI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CEMI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CEMI's competition here
FLDM vs ENZ Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ENZ has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ENZ trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ENZ's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ENZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to ENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ENZ's competition here
FLDM vs PMD Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PMD has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PMD trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PMD's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PMD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PMD's competition here
FLDM vs ME Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ME has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ME trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ME's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ME's ROE of -5.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ME's competition here
FLDM vs NOTV Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NOTV has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NOTV trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NOTV's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NOTV's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to NOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NOTV's competition here
FLDM vs MBAI Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MBAI has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MBAI trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MBAI's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MBAI's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MBAI's competition here
FLDM vs CHEK Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CHEK has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CHEK trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CHEK's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CHEK's ROE of +12.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to CHEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CHEK's competition here
FLDM vs BIAF Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BIAF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BIAF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BIAF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BIAF's ROE of -3.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to BIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BIAF's competition here
FLDM vs CNTG Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CNTG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CNTG trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CNTG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CNTG's ROE of +3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CNTG's competition here
FLDM vs TRIB Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, TRIB has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while TRIB trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas TRIB's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TRIB's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to TRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check TRIB's competition here
FLDM vs APDN Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, APDN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while APDN trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas APDN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to APDN's ROE of -8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to APDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check APDN's competition here
FLDM vs ADVB Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ADVB has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ADVB trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ADVB's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ADVB's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ADVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ADVB's competition here
FLDM vs NVTA Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NVTA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NVTA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NVTA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NVTA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to NVTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NVTA's competition here
FLDM vs LMDXW Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, LMDXW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while LMDXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas LMDXW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LMDXW's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to LMDXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check LMDXW's competition here
FLDM vs LMDX Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, LMDX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while LMDX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas LMDX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LMDX's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to LMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check LMDX's competition here
FLDM vs BGLC Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BGLC has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BGLC trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BGLC's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BGLC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to BGLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BGLC's competition here
FLDM vs BNGO Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BNGO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BNGO trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BNGO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BNGO's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to BNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BNGO's competition here
FLDM vs DMTK Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DMTK has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DMTK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DMTK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DMTK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to DMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DMTK's competition here
FLDM vs MYNZ Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MYNZ has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MYNZ trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MYNZ's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MYNZ's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to MYNZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MYNZ's competition here
FLDM vs NDRA Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NDRA has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NDRA trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NDRA's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NDRA's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to NDRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NDRA's competition here
FLDM vs INBS Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, INBS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while INBS trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas INBS's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to INBS's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to INBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check INBS's competition here
FLDM vs SQL Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SQL has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SQL trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SQL's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SQL's ROE of +9.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to SQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SQL's competition here
FLDM vs AWH Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, AWH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while AWH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas AWH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AWH's ROE of +4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to AWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check AWH's competition here
FLDM vs ISPC Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ISPC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ISPC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ISPC's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ISPC's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to ISPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ISPC's competition here
FLDM vs BIAFW Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BIAFW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BIAFW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BIAFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BIAFW's ROE of -3.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to BIAFW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BIAFW's competition here
FLDM vs HTGM Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, HTGM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while HTGM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas HTGM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HTGM's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to HTGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check HTGM's competition here
FLDM vs BIOC Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BIOC has a market cap of 450.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BIOC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BIOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BIOC's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to BIOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BIOC's competition here
FLDM vs PRENW Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PRENW has a market cap of 281.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PRENW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PRENW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PRENW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PRENW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PRENW's competition here
FLDM vs SQLLW Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SQLLW has a market cap of 159.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SQLLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SQLLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SQLLW's ROE of +6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to SQLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SQLLW's competition here
FLDM vs TTOO Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, TTOO has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while TTOO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas TTOO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TTOO's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to TTOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check TTOO's competition here
FLDM vs OCDX Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, OCDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while OCDX trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas OCDX's P/E ratio is -42.28. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OCDX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to OCDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check OCDX's competition here
FLDM vs DHR-PA Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DHR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DHR-PA trades at $1,841.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DHR-PA's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DHR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DHR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DHR-PA's competition here
FLDM vs MEUSW Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MEUSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MEUSW trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MEUSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MEUSW's ROE of -5.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to MEUSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MEUSW's competition here
FLDM vs BNGOW Comparison March 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BNGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BNGOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BNGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BNGOW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to BNGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BNGOW's competition here