Filo Mining Corp.
Filo Mining Corp. FIL.TO Peers
See (FIL.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIL.TO | CA$32.25 | -1.01% | 4.4B | -31.01 | -CA$1.04 | N/A |
| TECK-A.TO | CA$52.08 | +0.44% | 26.2B | 744.00 | CA$0.07 | +0.96% |
| TECK-B.TO | CA$52.02 | +0.54% | 25.9B | 743.14 | CA$0.07 | +1.92% |
| IVN.TO | CA$11.19 | +0.90% | 15.1B | 25.43 | CA$0.44 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | CA$8.86 | -0.56% | 5.7B | 9.53 | CA$0.93 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | CA$15.38 | -0.32% | 3.2B | -39.44 | -CA$0.39 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | CA$17.38 | +1.05% | 2B | -10.93 | -CA$1.59 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | CA$3.04 | -0.65% | 1.3B | -60.80 | -CA$0.05 | N/A |
| ALS.TO | CA$26.73 | -0.34% | 1.2B | 12.43 | CA$2.15 | +1.35% |
| VZLA.TO | CA$3.87 | -4.21% | 1.1B | -129.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FIL.TO vs TECK-A.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TECK-A.TO trades at CA$52.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 744.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to TECK-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TECK-B.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TECK-B.TO trades at CA$52.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 743.14. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to TECK-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs IVN.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while IVN.TO trades at CA$11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to IVN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs AKE.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while AKE.TO trades at CA$8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to AKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs NGEX.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while NGEX.TO trades at CA$15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -39.44. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to NGEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SKE.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SKE.TO trades at CA$17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to SKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs FOM.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while FOM.TO trades at CA$3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -60.80. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to FOM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs ALS.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while ALS.TO trades at CA$26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to ALS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs VZLA.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while VZLA.TO trades at CA$3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -129.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to VZLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LAC.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 834M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LAC.TO trades at CA$3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to LAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs NDM.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 791.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while NDM.TO trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to NDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs AII.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 754.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while AII.TO trades at CA$2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to AII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs MDI.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 659.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while MDI.TO trades at CA$8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to MDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LAAC.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LAAC.TO trades at CA$3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to LAAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs POM.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while POM.TO trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to POM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs FVL.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 544.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while FVL.TO trades at CA$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -103.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to FVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs USA.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 541.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while USA.TO trades at CA$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to USA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs ETG.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 470.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while ETG.TO trades at CA$2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -32.43. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to ETG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SOLG.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SOLG.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to SOLG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs ERD.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while ERD.TO trades at CA$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to ERD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LUCA.V Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LUCA.V trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to LUCA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs PMET.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 339.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while PMET.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to PMET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs WRN.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while WRN.TO trades at CA$1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to WRN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs GLO.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 301.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while GLO.TO trades at CA$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to GLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LIRC.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 287.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LIRC.TO trades at CA$5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -72.86. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to LIRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LIFT.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LIFT.CN trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to LIFT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SMT.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SMT.TO trades at CA$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to SMT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs ECOR.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 273.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while ECOR.TO trades at CA$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to ECOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TMQ.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 271M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TMQ.TO trades at CA$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -23.57. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to TMQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs MNO.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 246.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while MNO.TO trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to MNO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs PRYM.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while PRYM.TO trades at CA$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to PRYM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TLG.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 233.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TLG.TO trades at CA$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to TLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TLO.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TLO.TO trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to TLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs AMC.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while AMC.TO trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to AMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs FAR.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 175.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while FAR.TO trades at CA$1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to FAR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs ARA.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while ARA.TO trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -14.80. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to ARA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LAM.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs GEO.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 163.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while GEO.TO trades at CA$3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to GEO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs IBAT.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while IBAT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to IBAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs CDPR.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while CDPR.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to CDPR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs NB.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while NB.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to NB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs AOT.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while AOT.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to AOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LGO.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LGO.TO trades at CA$1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to LGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs FSY.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs MOLY.NE Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while MOLY.NE trades at CA$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -20.75. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to MOLY.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs FURY.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while FURY.TO trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to FURY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs GENM.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while GENM.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to GENM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs GMX.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while GMX.TO trades at CA$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to GMX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TI.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TI.TO trades at CA$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to TI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs S.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while S.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to S.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SLR.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SLR.TO trades at CA$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to SLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SAU.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SAU.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to SAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs WM.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while WM.TO trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to WM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs NVLH.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while NVLH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to NVLH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TSK.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TSK.TO trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -4.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to TSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs OGD.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while OGD.TO trades at CA$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to OGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs VROY.V Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while VROY.V trades at CA$2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -37.83. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to VROY.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs RUA.V Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while RUA.V trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to RUA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs NCF.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while NCF.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to NCF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs NEXT.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while NEXT.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to NEXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs ARS.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while ARS.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to ARS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs MIN.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while MIN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to MIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs FOX.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while FOX.CN trades at CA$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to FOX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs RUA.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while RUA.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to RUA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs RTG.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while RTG.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to RTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs VALU.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while VALU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to VALU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs NICO.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NICO.CN has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while NICO.CN trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas NICO.CN's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NICO.CN's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to NICO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TOC.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TOC.CN trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to TOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs BKI.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while BKI.TO trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to BKI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs FT.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while FT.TO trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to FT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs EGFV.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while EGFV.CN trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to EGFV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs AMPS.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while AMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to AMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs AAN.V Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while AAN.V trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to AAN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs CELL.V Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CELL.V has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while CELL.V trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas CELL.V's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CELL.V's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to CELL.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SX.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SX.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to SX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs URNM.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while URNM.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to URNM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs EXN.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while EXN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to EXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LVL.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LVL.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FIL.TO has daily volatility of 0.65 and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
FIL.TO vs VOY.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while VOY.CN trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to VOY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SAM.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SAM.TO trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to SAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TN.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TN.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to TN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs WRX.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while WRX.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to WRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs AVL.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while AVL.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to AVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SUPR.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SUPR.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -116.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to SUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TICO.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TICO.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to TICO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs COSA.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while COSA.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to COSA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs ASND.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while ASND.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to ASND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs PM.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while PM.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to PM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs TTX.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while TTX.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to TTX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs MAXX.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while MAXX.CN trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to MAXX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SCY.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SCY.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to SCY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SVB.TO Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SVB.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to SVB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs PEK.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while PEK.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to PEK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs NXU.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while NXU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to NXU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LFLR.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LFLR.CN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LFLR.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LFLR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LFLR.CN's ROE of -4.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to LFLR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs LIM.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while LIM.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to LIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs SLV.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while SLV.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is less volatile compared to SLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs GAMA.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GAMA.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while GAMA.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas GAMA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GAMA.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to GAMA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.
FIL.TO vs GDIG.CN Comparison
FIL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIL.TO stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GDIG.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIL.TO is priced at CA$32.25, while GDIG.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -31.01, whereas GDIG.CN's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, FIL.TO's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GDIG.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FIL.TO is more volatile compared to GDIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIL.TO.