FG Group Holdings Inc.

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CCL trades at $30.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CCL's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CUK trades at $27.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CUK's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while AS trades at $37.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 104.65. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check AS's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while HAS trades at $80.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HAS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check HAS's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while PLNT trades at $104.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 48.01. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check PLNT's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while LTH trades at $27.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check LTH's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while MAT trades at $18.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check MAT's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while GOLF trades at $79.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check GOLF's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ELY trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ELY's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while PTON trades at $8.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -28.40. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check PTON's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while SEAS trades at $50.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check SEAS's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while PRKS trades at $53.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check PRKS's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while YETI trades at $33.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check YETI's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while SIX trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check SIX's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while VSTO trades at $44.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check VSTO's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while FUN trades at $26.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FUN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check FUN's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while OSW trades at $21.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check OSW's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while MODG trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check MODG's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while LUCK trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -144.43. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LUCK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check LUCK's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while GEAR trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check GEAR's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 402.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while JOUT trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check JOUT's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while XPOF trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check XPOF's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CNXA trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CNXA's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CNXA's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DOGZ trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -39.74. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DOGZ's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while JAKK trades at $17.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check JAKK's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while SRM trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SRM's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check SRM's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ESCA trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ESCA's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while PLBY trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +16.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check PLBY's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while FNKO trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check FNKO's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 130.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CLAR trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CLAR's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while AOUT trades at $9.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -965.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check AOUT's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while YYAI trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to YYAI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check YYAI's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while AGH trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -181.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check AGH's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while BTN trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check BTN's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ISPO trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ISPO's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while NLS trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check NLS's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while GDHG trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check GDHG's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while MMA trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MMA's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check MMA's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while HWH trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HWH's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check HWH's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while NWTG trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check NWTG's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while FXLV trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check FXLV's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while SPGC trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check SPGC's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 124.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ISPOW's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while BBIG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check BBIG's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DVD trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DVD's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DS-PB's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DS-PD's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DS-PC's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DS trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DS's competition here

FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check BWL-A's competition here