Flight Centre Travel Group Limited
Flight Centre Travel Group Limited FGETF Peers
See (FGETF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGETF | $13.37 | N/A | 3B | 40.52 | $0.33 | +1.21% |
| TRPCF | $63.00 | -3.06% | 41.2B | 18.53 | $3.40 | +0.48% |
| AMADF | $86.30 | +0.49% | 38B | 26.72 | $3.23 | +1.33% |
| AMADY | $84.84 | +0.82% | 37B | 25.94 | $3.27 | +1.26% |
| TNGCF | $2.30 | -6.52% | 5.3B | 19.17 | $0.12 | N/A |
| DRTGF | $23.50 | N/A | 5B | 8.22 | $2.86 | +0.61% |
| TUIFF | $8.44 | N/A | 4.3B | 7.09 | $1.19 | N/A |
| LGDDF | $22.26 | +7.23% | 3.1B | 16.61 | $1.34 | +3.41% |
| TNLIY | $6.81 | N/A | 1.5B | 20.03 | $0.34 | N/A |
| CTMLF | $8.75 | -41.71% | 1.3B | 31.25 | $0.28 | +2.13% |
Stock Comparison
FGETF vs TRPCF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, TRPCF has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while TRPCF trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas TRPCF's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRPCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to TRPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs AMADF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, AMADF has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while AMADF trades at $86.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas AMADF's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMADF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to AMADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs AMADY Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, AMADY has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while AMADY trades at $84.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas AMADY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMADY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to AMADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs TNGCF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, TNGCF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while TNGCF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas TNGCF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and TNGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs DRTGF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, DRTGF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while DRTGF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas DRTGF's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRTGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and DRTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs TUIFF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, TUIFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while TUIFF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas TUIFF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TUIFF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and TUIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs LGDDF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, LGDDF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while LGDDF trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas LGDDF's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGDDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and LGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs TNLIY Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, TNLIY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while TNLIY trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas TNLIY's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNLIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and TNLIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs CTMLF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, CTMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while CTMLF trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas CTMLF's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and CTMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs WEBJF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, WEBJF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while WEBJF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas WEBJF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEBJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to WEBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs EDDRF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, EDDRF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while EDDRF trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas EDDRF's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDDRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and EDDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs WEJTY Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, WEJTY has a market cap of 940.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while WEJTY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas WEJTY's P/E ratio is 142.50. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEJTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to WEJTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs OOBHF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, OOBHF has a market cap of 430.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while OOBHF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas OOBHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OOBHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and OOBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs EOVBF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, EOVBF has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while EOVBF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas EOVBF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EOVBF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to EOVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs LSMNF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, LSMNF has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while LSMNF trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas LSMNF's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSMNF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and LSMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs HWGG Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, HWGG has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while HWGG trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas HWGG's P/E ratio is -137.33. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWGG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to HWGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs HSWLF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, HSWLF has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while HSWLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas HSWLF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSWLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and HSWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs TRZBF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, TRZBF has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while TRZBF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas TRZBF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRZBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to TRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs ONVC Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, ONVC has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while ONVC trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas ONVC's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONVC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and ONVC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs ZMWYF Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, ZMWYF has a market cap of 992.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while ZMWYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas ZMWYF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZMWYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and ZMWYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs NNAX Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, NNAX has a market cap of 495.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while NNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas NNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNAX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to NNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs CDNO Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, CDNO has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while CDNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas CDNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDNO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to CDNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs ARMV Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, ARMV has a market cap of 61.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while ARMV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas ARMV's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARMV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and ARMV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs GWYT Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, GWYT has a market cap of 17.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while GWYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas GWYT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GWYT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to GWYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.
FGETF vs WESC Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, WESC has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while WESC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas WESC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WESC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and WESC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FGETF vs OHTR Comparison
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 3B. In comparison, OHTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $13.37, while OHTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.52, whereas OHTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OHTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to OHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.