FirstRand Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FANDF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FANDF
FirstRand Limited (FANDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FANDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANDF | $5.44 | +8.47% | 28B | 10.67 | $0.47 | +7.54% |
| BACRP | $302.00 | +0.00% | 2.2T | N/A | N/A | +2.23% |
| CICHY | $21.75 | +1.33% | 377B | 5.73 | $3.77 | +3.88% |
| IDCBY | $17.71 | +0.97% | 317.5B | 6.14 | $2.90 | +3.64% |
| IDCBF | $0.88 | +4.76% | 313.6B | 5.87 | $0.15 | +4.88% |
| HBCYF | $15.51 | -5.31% | 288.5B | 14.00 | $1.20 | +4.45% |
| ACGBF | $0.67 | +0.00% | 255.9B | 6.09 | $0.11 | +5.14% |
| ACGBY | $18.12 | +1.91% | 253.7B | 6.40 | $2.83 | +3.48% |
| CICHF | $1.05 | +2.94% | 247.6B | 5.42 | $0.19 | +5.33% |
| MBFJF | $17.53 | -0.14% | 205.3B | 17.25 | $1.05 | +2.37% |
Stock Comparison
FANDF vs BACRP Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BACRP trades at $302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACRP's competition here
FANDF vs CICHY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 377B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while CICHY trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check CICHY's competition here
FANDF vs IDCBY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 317.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while IDCBY trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check IDCBY's competition here
FANDF vs IDCBF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 313.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while IDCBF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and IDCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDCBF's competition here
FANDF vs HBCYF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 288.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while HBCYF trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and HBCYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HBCYF's competition here
FANDF vs ACGBF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 255.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while ACGBF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ACGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACGBF's competition here
FANDF vs ACGBY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 253.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while ACGBY trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check ACGBY's competition here
FANDF vs CICHF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 247.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while CICHF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and CICHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CICHF's competition here
FANDF vs MBFJF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 205.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while MBFJF trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and MBFJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBFJF's competition here
FANDF vs CMWAY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 201.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while CMWAY trades at $121.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check CMWAY's competition here
FANDF vs CBAUF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while CBAUF trades at $119.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBAUF's competition here
FANDF vs BACHY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 199.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BACHY trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check BACHY's competition here
FANDF vs BACHF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 198B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BACHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACHF's competition here
FANDF vs BCDRF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 162.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BCDRF trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check BCDRF's competition here
FANDF vs SMFNF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while SMFNF trades at $34.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check SMFNF's competition here
FANDF vs BBVXF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BBVXF trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check BBVXF's competition here
FANDF vs NAUBF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while NAUBF trades at $32.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and NAUBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAUBF's competition here
FANDF vs WEBNF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while WEBNF trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check WEBNF's competition here
FANDF vs NABZY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while NABZY trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check NABZY's competition here
FANDF vs BKFCF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFCF's competition here
FANDF vs ANZGY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while ANZGY trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check ANZGY's competition here
FANDF vs BCLYF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BCLYF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check BCLYF's competition here
FANDF vs INGVF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while INGVF trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check INGVF's competition here
FANDF vs BCMXY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BCMXY trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check BCMXY's competition here
FANDF vs RBSPF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while RBSPF trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check RBSPF's competition here
FANDF vs ANEWF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
FANDF vs NTIOF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while NTIOF trades at $134.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check NTIOF's competition here
FANDF vs SCBFY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while SCBFY trades at $42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check SCBFY's competition here
FANDF vs SCBFF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while SCBFF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check SCBFF's competition here
FANDF vs TDBKF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check TDBKF's competition here
FANDF vs FANDY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while FANDY trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check FANDY's competition here
FANDF vs AAVMY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while AAVMY trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check AAVMY's competition here
FANDF vs SVNLY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while SVNLY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check SVNLY's competition here
FANDF vs SVNLF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while SVNLF trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check SVNLF's competition here
FANDF vs ABMRF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while ABMRF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
FANDF vs RBCPF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check RBCPF's competition here
FANDF vs BNSPF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
FANDF vs BNDSY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BNDSY trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check BNDSY's competition here
FANDF vs BNDSF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BNDSF trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check BNDSF's competition here
FANDF vs WFCNP Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while WFCNP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check WFCNP's competition here
FANDF vs EFGXY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while EFGXY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check EFGXY's competition here
FANDF vs ALORY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALORY's competition here
FANDF vs NBKCF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while NBKCF trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check NBKCF's competition here
FANDF vs EFGIF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while EFGIF trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check EFGIF's competition here
FANDF vs CSGKF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGKF's competition here
FANDF vs VUPPF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VUPPF's competition here
FANDF vs PRRCF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while PRRCF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRRCF's competition here
FANDF vs BCSO Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check BCSO's competition here
FANDF vs ANZBY Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here
FANDF vs TNTTF Comparison April 2026
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 28B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $5.44, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.Check TNTTF's competition here