FirstRand Limited
FirstRand Limited FANDF Peers
See (FANDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANDF | $4.24 | +0.00% | 23.7B | 10.60 | $0.40 | +5.56% |
| IDCBY | $15.61 | -0.83% | 5.3T | 5.75 | $2.71 | +4.20% |
| BACRP | $192.01 | +0.00% | 460.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.53% |
| IDCBF | $0.79 | +0.00% | 345.5B | 5.38 | $0.14 | +11.41% |
| ACGBF | $0.66 | +0.00% | 286B | 6.60 | $0.10 | +5.59% |
| ACGBY | $17.01 | -0.18% | 277.6B | 6.50 | $2.62 | +3.72% |
| CICHY | $21.34 | -0.97% | 257B | 5.94 | $3.60 | +4.04% |
| CICHF | $1.03 | -1.90% | 248.2B | 5.74 | $0.18 | +5.42% |
| BACHY | $14.81 | -0.94% | 239.2B | 5.65 | $2.62 | +4.29% |
| BACHF | $0.61 | +0.00% | 222.7B | 6.10 | $0.10 | +5.51% |
Stock Comparison
FANDF vs IDCBY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 5.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while IDCBY trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs BACRP Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 460.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BACRP trades at $192.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs IDCBF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 345.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while IDCBF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and IDCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs ACGBF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 286B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while ACGBF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ACGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs ACGBY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 277.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while ACGBY trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs CICHY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 257B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while CICHY trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs CICHF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 248.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while CICHF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs BACHY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 239.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BACHY trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs BACHF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 222.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BACHF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs HBCYF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 220.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while HBCYF trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs CBAUF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 203.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while CBAUF trades at $116.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs CMWAY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 194.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while CMWAY trades at $116.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs MBFJF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while MBFJF trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and MBFJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs BCDRF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 125.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BCDRF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs SMFNF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while SMFNF trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs BBVXF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BBVXF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs NAUBF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while NAUBF trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and NAUBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs NABZY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while NABZY trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs BKFCF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BKFCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs BCLYF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BCLYF trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs WEBNF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while WEBNF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and WEBNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs ANZGY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while ANZGY trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs RBSPF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while RBSPF trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs ANEWF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs INGVF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while INGVF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and INGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs BCMXY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BCMXY trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BCMXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs SCBFF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while SCBFF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs SCBFY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while SCBFY trades at $36.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs NBKCF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and NBKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs NTIOF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while NTIOF trades at $104.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and NTIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs TDBKF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and TDBKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs RBCPF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs SVNLF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while SVNLF trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs SVNLY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while SVNLY trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs AAVMY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while AAVMY trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.
FANDF vs ABMRF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while ABMRF trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs BNSPF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs BNDSF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BNDSF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BNDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs WFCNP Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while WFCNP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and WFCNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs BNDSY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BNDSY trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BNDSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs ALORY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while ALORY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs EFGIF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while EFGIF trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and EFGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs EFGXY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and EFGXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs CSGKF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs FANDY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while FANDY trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and FANDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs VUPPF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs PRRCF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 547.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while PRRCF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs BCSO Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and BCSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs ANZBY Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FANDF vs TNTTF Comparison
FANDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANDF stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANDF is priced at $4.24, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANDF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.60, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, FANDF's ROE is +2.46%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FANDF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANDF.