Estrella Immunopharma, Inc.
Estrella Immunopharma, Inc. ESLAW Peers
See (ESLAW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESLAW | $0.05 | +29.18% | 1.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VRTX | $450.50 | +1.51% | 115.7B | -117.62 | -$3.83 | N/A |
| REGN | $493.02 | +2.06% | 52.3B | 12.54 | $39.32 | +0.36% |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $300.83 | -2.33% | 39.2B | -143.25 | -$2.10 | N/A |
| ARGX | $585.34 | +0.82% | 35.7B | 35.74 | $16.38 | N/A |
| BNTX | $108.49 | -1.51% | 26.1B | -29.89 | -$3.63 | N/A |
| BGNE | $184.71 | +0.49% | 20.2B | -22.55 | -$8.19 | N/A |
| RPRX | $33.78 | +0.09% | 19B | 13.79 | $2.45 | +2.55% |
| DNA-WT | $0.27 | -2.76% | 18.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ESLAW vs VRTX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while VRTX trades at $450.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is -117.62. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VRTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs REGN Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while REGN trades at $493.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs SGEN Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ALNY Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ALNY trades at $300.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is -143.25. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ALNY's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ARGX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ARGX trades at $585.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs BNTX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while BNTX trades at $108.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -29.89. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs BGNE Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to BGNE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RPRX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RPRX trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs DNA-WT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs SMMT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while SMMT trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -60.56. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs UTHR Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while UTHR trades at $325.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs GMAB Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while GMAB trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs INCY Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while INCY trades at $68.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 343.85. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs KRTX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs EXEL Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while EXEL trades at $43.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs BMRN Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while BMRN trades at $56.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MRNA Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MRNA trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ASND Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ASND trades at $173.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -26.26. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RXDX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs IMGN Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs BPMC Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while BPMC trades at $127.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -50.94. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CERE Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ROIVW Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ROIVW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ROIVW trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROIVW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ROIVW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ROIVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RVMD Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RVMD trades at $41.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs TECH Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while TECH trades at $48.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 58.67. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ROIV Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ROIV trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -14.97. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CORT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CORT trades at $69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 60.52. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs BBIO Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while BBIO trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs VRNA Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while VRNA trades at $84.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -42.17. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs JAZZ Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while JAZZ trades at $111.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs HALO Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while HALO trades at $54.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RETA Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs TGTX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while TGTX trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 160.24. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MDGL Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MDGL trades at $278.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs TLX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while TLX trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is 186.33. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs IONS Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while IONS trades at $35.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs NUVL Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while NUVL trades at $78.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -17.65. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ABCM Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ISEE Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs AXSM Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while AXSM trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -19.38. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs AMRN Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AMRN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while AMRN trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRN's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AMRN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to AMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ALKS Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ALKS trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ADMA Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ADMA trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs PCVX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while PCVX trades at $36.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ALPN Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RNA Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RNA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RNA trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNA's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RYTM Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RYTM trades at $68.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs AKRO Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while AKRO trades at $54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.21. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs SRPT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SRPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while SRPT trades at $43.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRPT's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SRPT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to SRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs OPT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to OPT's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ZLAB Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ZLAB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ZLAB trades at $38.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLAB's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ZLAB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ZLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs PTCT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while PTCT trades at $52.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MRTX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs KRYS Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while KRYS trades at $136.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MRUS Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MRUS trades at $56.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CYTK Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CYTK trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +8.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs SLNO Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SLNO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while SLNO trades at $75.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNO's P/E ratio is -15.93. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SLNO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to SLNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ACLX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ACLX trades at $68.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -22.78. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RYZB Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CBAY Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ACAD Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ACAD trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CRSP Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CRSP trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs SWTX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while SWTX trades at $46.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RARE Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RARE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RARE trades at $37.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RARE's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RARE's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs PTGX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while PTGX trades at $54.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is 69.72. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to PTGX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs SRRK Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while SRRK trades at $34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -13.42. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs LEGN Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while LEGN trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -29.66. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CPRX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CPRX trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs VKTX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while VKTX trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -23.99. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs KYMR Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while KYMR trades at $47.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -15.31. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CRNX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CRNX trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MLTX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MLTX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MLTX trades at $46.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLTX's P/E ratio is -20.38. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MLTX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MTSR Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MTSR trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs IMVT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while IMVT trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MORF Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MORF trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MOR Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MOR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MOR's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs IBRX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while IBRX trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs KDNY Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KDNY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while KDNY trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDNY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to KDNY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to KDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MYOV Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MYOV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MYOV trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYOV's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MYOV's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MYOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs AAPG Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AAPG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while AAPG trades at $28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPG's P/E ratio is -37.34. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AAPG's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to AAPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs APGE Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while APGE trades at $40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs XENE Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while XENE trades at $31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs APLS Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while APLS trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to APLS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs PRVB Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PRVB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while PRVB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRVB's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to PRVB's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to PRVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs LBPH Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LBPH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while LBPH trades at $59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBPH's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to LBPH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to LBPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs ARWR Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while ARWR trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs BCRX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BCRX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while BCRX trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCRX's P/E ratio is -42.46. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to BCRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to BCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs MIRM Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while MIRM trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -28.81. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs DICE Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DICE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while DICE trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DICE's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to DICE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to DICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs NAMS Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while NAMS trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs KNSA Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while KNSA trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is -120.92. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to KNSA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs RXRX Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RXRX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while RXRX trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXRX's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RXRX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to RXRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs VCEL Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VCEL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while VCEL trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCEL's P/E ratio is 866.00. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VCEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to VCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs VCYT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while VCYT trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 65.38. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CALT Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CALT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CALT trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALT's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CALT's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CALT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs DNLI Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while DNLI trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs NAMSW Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while NAMSW trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs CGON Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while CGON trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -17.94. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.
ESLAW vs LGND Comparison
ESLAW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESLAW stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESLAW is priced at $0.05, while LGND trades at $106.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESLAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is -14.54. In terms of profitability, ESLAW's ROE is -1.56%, compared to LGND's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESLAW is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESLAW.