Enerplus Corporation
Enerplus Corporation ERF.TO Peers
See (ERF.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERF.TO | CA$26.78 | -3.36% | 5.7B | 10.93 | CA$2.45 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | CA$43.96 | +1.97% | 89.6B | 12.02 | CA$3.56 | +6.68% |
| TOU.TO | CA$65.40 | -0.53% | 25.4B | 19.44 | CA$3.38 | +3.55% |
| ARX.TO | CA$28.07 | -2.47% | 16.8B | 12.70 | CA$2.26 | +2.51% |
| OVV.TO | CA$54.41 | +3.30% | 13.5B | 16.01 | CA$3.24 | +3.23% |
| WCP.TO | CA$9.21 | +1.10% | 11.3B | 5.98 | CA$1.53 | +8.48% |
| CPG.TO | CA$11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | CA$0.49 | +5.03% |
| MEG.TO | CA$25.73 | +0.04% | 6.5B | 11.04 | CA$2.33 | +1.17% |
| SCR.TO | CA$30.31 | +0.13% | 6.4B | 9.08 | CA$3.31 | +2.70% |
| PSK.TO | CA$23.71 | +0.94% | 5.6B | 24.86 | CA$0.95 | +4.32% |
Stock Comparison
ERF.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while CNQ.TO trades at CA$43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while TOU.TO trades at CA$65.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while ARX.TO trades at CA$28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while OVV.TO trades at CA$54.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while WCP.TO trades at CA$9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while CPG.TO trades at CA$11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while MEG.TO trades at CA$25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while SCR.TO trades at CA$30.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PSK.TO trades at CA$23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PEY.TO trades at CA$18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs POU.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while POU.TO trades at CA$21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while NVA.TO trades at CA$14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while ATH.TO trades at CA$5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while IPCO.TO trades at CA$22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while TVE.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while FRU.TO trades at CA$12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while BIR.TO trades at CA$7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while AAV.TO trades at CA$11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -65.72. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while BTE.TO trades at CA$2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while HWX.TO trades at CA$6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs VET.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while VET.TO trades at CA$10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -47.33. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while KEL.TO trades at CA$7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PXT.TO trades at CA$14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while AOI.TO trades at CA$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs CR.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while CR.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while CJ.TO trades at CA$6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 926M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while KEC.TO trades at CA$21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 762.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while SDE.TO trades at CA$3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 762M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while VLE.TO trades at CA$7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while BIR-PA.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 613.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while TAL.TO trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 606.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while SGY.TO trades at CA$6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is -14.90. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while TNZ.TO trades at CA$19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -43.93. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PIPE.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while OBE.TO trades at CA$8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 511.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while FEC.TO trades at CA$6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while GFR.TO trades at CA$6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while SOIL.TO trades at CA$2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.34. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while TGL.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 332.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while KEI.TO trades at CA$9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while ITE.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while IPO.TO trades at CA$9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 229.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while GTE.TO trades at CA$6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PNE.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 185.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PRQ.TO trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 144.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while RBY.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while QEC.TO trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while BNE.TO trades at CA$3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 70.20. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while JOY.TO trades at CA$2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while GXE.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while CDR.TO trades at CA$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -36.80. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while YGR.TO trades at CA$1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PEA.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while FORZ.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while CNE.TO trades at CA$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while TXP.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PPR.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while PMT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while XOP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ERF.TO has daily volatility of 5.87 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
ERF.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while TCF.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while SQX.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is less volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while BNG.TO trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while OIL.CN trades at CA$5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while JBR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while SHP.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while VIK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while BDR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while WOGC.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while GTOO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs EI.CN Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while EI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while SRX.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while BIR-PC.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while CPI.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.
ERF.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison
ERF.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF.TO stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ERF.TO is priced at CA$26.78, while CNU.TO trades at CA$121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERF.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.TO.