EPWK Holdings Ltd.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 124.91B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while ADP trades at $307.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RCRUY has a market cap of 86.46B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RCRUY trades at $11.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RCRUY's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RCRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to RCRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RCRRF has a market cap of 82.36B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RCRRF trades at $56.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RCRRF's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RCRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to RCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, PAYX has a market cap of 54.62B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while PAYX trades at $151.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas PAYX's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to PAYX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to PAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RANJY has a market cap of 14.60B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RANJY trades at $20.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RANJY's P/E ratio is 61.26. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RANJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to RANJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, AHEXY has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while AHEXY trades at $13.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas AHEXY's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to AHEXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to AHEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RANJF has a market cap of 6.55B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RANJF trades at $37.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RANJF's P/E ratio is 54.20. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RANJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to RANJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, SKLTY has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while SKLTY trades at $26.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas SKLTY's P/E ratio is 174.92. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to SKLTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to SKLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RHI trades at $44.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, AHEXF has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while AHEXF trades at $25.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas AHEXF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to AHEXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to AHEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while TNET trades at $81.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, TEMPF has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while TEMPF trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas TEMPF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to TEMPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to TEMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while BZ trades at $15.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while KFY trades at $66.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while NSP trades at $65.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to NSP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, TCCPY has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while TCCPY trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas TCCPY's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to TCCPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to TCCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, MPGPY has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while MPGPY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas MPGPY's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to MPGPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to MPGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while UPWK trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, TXHPF has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while TXHPF trades at $20.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas TXHPF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to TXHPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to TXHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while MAN trades at $41.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to MAN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, HAYPY has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while HAYPY trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas HAYPY's P/E ratio is -80.75. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to HAYPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to HAYPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, MEITF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while MEITF trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas MEITF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to MEITF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to MEITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, MPGPF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while MPGPF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas MPGPF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to MPGPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to MPGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while BBSI trades at $40.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.19M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while HRT trades at $14.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 873.29M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while HSII trades at $42.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 117.64. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.05M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while HHR trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 731.60M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while KFRC trades at $39.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, ENJPY has a market cap of 715.78M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while ENJPY trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas ENJPY's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to ENJPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to ENJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, IGPPF has a market cap of 498.22M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while IGPPF trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas IGPPF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to IGPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to IGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 449.11M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while ZIP trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIP's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, KELYB has a market cap of 431.06M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while KELYB trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas KELYB's P/E ratio is -565.75. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to KELYB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to KELYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 418.12M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while KELYA trades at $12.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is -604.50. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, TGDLF has a market cap of 308.69M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while TGDLF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas TGDLF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to TGDLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to TGDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 139.49M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while HQI trades at $9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 131.70M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while TBI trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 92.74M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while MHH trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 85.46M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while DHX trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is 186.00. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to DHX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, VOLT has a market cap of 67.59M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while VOLT trades at $22.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas VOLT's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to VOLT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to VOLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, CAEEF has a market cap of 55.94M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while CAEEF trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas CAEEF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to CAEEF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to CAEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 37.83M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while BGSF trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 37.07M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while NIXX trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to NIXX's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 34.78M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while NIXXW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to NIXXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to NIXXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 28.06M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while HSON trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to HSON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 19.98M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while JOB trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, CWLPF has a market cap of 15.07M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while CWLPF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas CWLPF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to CWLPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to CWLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RLBY has a market cap of 14.76M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RLBY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RLBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RLBY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to RLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RCRT trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RCRT's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, GLXG has a market cap of 10.50M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while GLXG trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas GLXG's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to GLXG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to GLXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, LTNC has a market cap of 6.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while LTNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas LTNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to LTNC's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to LTNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 4.47M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while CLIK trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to CLIK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while IPDN trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.27M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while PIXY trades at $6.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, STAF has a market cap of 2.66M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while STAF trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas STAF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to STAF's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to STAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, TREP has a market cap of 2.37M. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while TREP trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas TREP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to TREP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to TREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, FTRS has a market cap of 876880.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while FTRS trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas FTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to FTRS's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to FTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RVLTF has a market cap of 521011.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RVLTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RVLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RVLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to RVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, WDHR has a market cap of 467189.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while WDHR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas WDHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to WDHR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to WDHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, HIRRF has a market cap of 413508.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while HIRRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas HIRRF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to HIRRF's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to HIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, GXXM has a market cap of 240561.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while GXXM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas GXXM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to GXXM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to GXXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, SSET has a market cap of 85139.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while SSET trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas SSET's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to SSET's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to SSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, PBHG has a market cap of 45950.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while PBHG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas PBHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to PBHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to PBHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11498.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, MCTH has a market cap of 2450.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while MCTH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas MCTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to MCTH's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to MCTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, CTPR has a market cap of 875.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while CTPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas CTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to CTPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is less volatile compared to CTPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, NZIH has a market cap of 223.00. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while NZIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas NZIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to NZIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to NZIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, BNTOF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while BNTOF trades at $13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas BNTOF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to BNTOF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to BNTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, JOBS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while JOBS trades at $60.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas JOBS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to JOBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to JOBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.

EPWK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPWK stands at 137.73M. In comparison, FRSI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EPWK is priced at $7.34, while FRSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPWK currently has a P/E ratio of -146.80, whereas FRSI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EPWK's ROE is N/A, compared to FRSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPWK is more volatile compared to FRSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPWK.