EPR Properties
EPR Properties EPR Peers
See (EPR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPR | $59.06 | +1.38% | 4.4B | 35.87 | $1.63 | +5.91% |
| AMT | $224.25 | +1.46% | 105.1B | 36.33 | $6.18 | +2.95% |
| EQIX | $788.14 | -0.92% | 77.8B | 83.37 | $9.54 | +2.25% |
| CCI | $103.24 | +0.50% | 45.2B | -11.51 | -$9.01 | +5.53% |
| IRM | $99.80 | -2.70% | 29.5B | 243.63 | $0.41 | +3.00% |
| SBAC | $239.20 | +1.85% | 25.7B | 31.58 | $7.56 | +1.75% |
| WY | $26.62 | +3.62% | 19B | 53.53 | $0.49 | +3.11% |
| GLPI | $48.06 | +2.95% | 13B | 16.76 | $2.83 | +6.45% |
| LAMR | $124.10 | +2.26% | 12.6B | 29.96 | $4.11 | +4.98% |
| RYN | $23.12 | +4.24% | 3.5B | 9.57 | $2.38 | +12.79% |
Stock Comparison
EPR vs AMT Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while AMT trades at $224.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs EQIX Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while EQIX trades at $788.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 83.37. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs CCI Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while CCI trades at $103.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs IRM Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while IRM trades at $99.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 243.63. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs SBAC Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while SBAC trades at $239.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs WY Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while WY trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 53.53. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs GLPI Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while GLPI trades at $48.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs LAMR Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while LAMR trades at $124.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs RYN Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while RYN trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs PCH Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while PCH trades at $40.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 64.95. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs OUT Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while OUT trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs EPR-PE Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while EPR-PE trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs CXW Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while CXW trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs EPR-PC Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while EPR-PC trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs EPR-PG Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while EPR-PG trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs SMA Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while SMA trades at $36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is -105.71. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs UNIT Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while UNIT trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs LANDP Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 696.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while LANDP trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs FPI Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 526.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while FPI trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is more volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs AFCG Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while AFCG trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs PW Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while PW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PW's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.
EPR vs CTT Comparison
EPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPR stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EPR is priced at $59.06, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPR currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, EPR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPR is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPR.