Eurogas International Inc.
Eurogas International Inc. EI.CN Peers
See (EI.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EI.CN | $0.02 | N/A | 466583.00 | -0.30 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | $42.90 | -0.58% | 90.06B | 12.05 | $3.56 | +5.13% |
| TOU.TO | $62.75 | -0.79% | 23.49B | 19.07 | $3.29 | +2.71% |
| ARX.TO | $29.15 | +1.92% | 17.08B | 12.90 | $2.26 | +2.47% |
| OVV.TO | $52.21 | -0.65% | 13.56B | 15.82 | $3.30 | +3.22% |
| WCP.TO | $8.58 | +0.70% | 10.55B | 5.61 | $1.53 | +8.50% |
| CPG.TO | $11.72 | -0.34% | 7.24B | 23.92 | $0.49 | +5.03% |
| MEG.TO | $25.29 | +18.73% | 6.49B | 10.85 | $2.33 | +1.19% |
| SCR.TO | $30.26 | -2.13% | 6.48B | 10.73 | $2.82 | +2.51% |
| ERF.TO | $26.78 | -3.36% | 5.66B | 10.93 | $2.45 | +1.09% |
Stock Comparison
EI.CN vs CNQ.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 90.06B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while CNQ.TO trades at $42.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs TOU.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 23.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while TOU.TO trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs ARX.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 17.08B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while ARX.TO trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs OVV.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 13.56B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while OVV.TO trades at $52.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs WCP.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 10.55B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while WCP.TO trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs CPG.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while CPG.TO trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs MEG.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 6.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while MEG.TO trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs SCR.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 6.48B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while SCR.TO trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs ERF.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while ERF.TO trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PSK.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PSK.TO trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PEY.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 3.78B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PEY.TO trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs NVA.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while NVA.TO trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs POU.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while POU.TO trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs ATH.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while ATH.TO trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs IPCO.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while IPCO.TO trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs TVE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while TVE.TO trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs FRU.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while FRU.TO trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs BTE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while BTE.TO trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs BIR.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while BIR.TO trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs AAV.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while AAV.TO trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -60.71. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs HWX.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while HWX.TO trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs VET.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while VET.TO trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -44.62. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs KEL.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while KEL.TO trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs AOI.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while AOI.TO trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PXT.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PXT.TO trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs CR.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while CR.TO trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs CJ.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 991.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while CJ.TO trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs VLE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 784.32M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while VLE.TO trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs KEC.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 739.96M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while KEC.TO trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and KEC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.50M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while BIR-PA.TO trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and BIR-PA.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs SDE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 566.12M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while SDE.TO trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PIPE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.50M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PIPE.TO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs TAL.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 540.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while TAL.TO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs SGY.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 527.43M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while SGY.TO trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs OBE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 490.00M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while OBE.TO trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs GFR.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 437.02M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while GFR.TO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs TNZ.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 433.46M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while TNZ.TO trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -34.93. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs FEC.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 375.65M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while FEC.TO trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs TGL.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.88M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while TGL.TO trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs SOIL.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 335.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while SOIL.TO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs KEI.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 328.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while KEI.TO trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs ITE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while ITE.TO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs GTE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 242.00M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while GTE.TO trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs IPO.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 226.03M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while IPO.TO trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PNE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 197.09M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PNE.TO trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs RBY.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 167.22M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while RBY.TO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PRQ.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 165.39M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PRQ.TO trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs GXE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.52M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while GXE.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs CDR.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 122.79M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while CDR.TO trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs BNE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 120.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while BNE.TO trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs QEC.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 115.70M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while QEC.TO trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs JOY.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 112.19M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while JOY.TO trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs CNE.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 96.90M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while CNE.TO trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PEA.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.83M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PEA.TO trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs YGR.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 91.62M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while YGR.TO trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs FORZ.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.79M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while FORZ.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and FORZ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs TXP.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 85.13M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while TXP.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PPR.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 49.05M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PPR.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs PMT.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.74M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while PMT.TO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and PMT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs XOP.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.35M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while XOP.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
EI.CN vs TCF.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 6.52M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while TCF.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and TCF.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs BNG.TO Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 4.85M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while BNG.TO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and BNG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs SQX.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while SQX.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and SQX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs OIL.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while OIL.CN trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and OIL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs JBR.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while JBR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and JBR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs BDR.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 1.36M. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while BDR.CN trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN is less volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EI.CN.
EI.CN vs VIK.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 917420.00. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while VIK.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and VIK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs WOGC.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791812.00. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while WOGC.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and WOGC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
EI.CN vs GTOO.CN Comparison
EI.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EI.CN stands at 466583.00. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520922.00. Regarding current trading prices, EI.CN is priced at $0.02, while GTOO.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, EI.CN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EI.CN and GTOO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).