eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Inc.

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while VRTX trades at $468.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is -123.27. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to VRTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check VRTX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while REGN trades at $558.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check REGN's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while SGEN trades at $228.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check SGEN's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ALNY trades at $330.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is -157.40. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ALNY's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ALNY's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ARGX trades at $598.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ARGX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while BNTX trades at $111.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check BNTX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RPRX trades at $37.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RPRX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while BGNE trades at $184.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to BGNE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check BGNE's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while SMMT trades at $26.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -78.65. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check SMMT's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check DNA-WT's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while INCY trades at $77.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 386.88. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check INCY's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while GMAB trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check GMAB's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while UTHR trades at $297.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check UTHR's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MRNA trades at $32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MRNA's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while KRTX trades at $329.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check KRTX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while BMRN trades at $58.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check BMRN's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while EXEL trades at $36.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check EXEL's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ASND trades at $163.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -24.38. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ASND's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RXDX trades at $199.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RXDX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while TECH trades at $57.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 69.72. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check TECH's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while VRNA trades at $105.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -52.58. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check VRNA's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while BBIO trades at $46.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -13.01. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check BBIO's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while IMGN trades at $31.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check IMGN's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while BPMC trades at $129.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check BPMC's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while CERE trades at $44.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check CERE's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ROIVW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ROIVW trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROIVW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ROIVW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ROIVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ROIVW's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ROIV trades at $11.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -15.23. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ROIV's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while HALO trades at $59.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check HALO's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while CORT trades at $68.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 59.30. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check CORT's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while JAZZ trades at $116.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check JAZZ's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RVMD trades at $37.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RVMD's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while IONS trades at $41.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check IONS's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RETA trades at $172.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RETA's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MDGL trades at $294.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -16.51. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MDGL's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, AMRN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while AMRN trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to AMRN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to AMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check AMRN's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while NUVL trades at $79.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -17.92. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check NUVL's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RYTM trades at $85.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -30.60. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RYTM's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while TGTX trades at $35.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 147.21. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check TGTX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ABCM trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ABCM's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ISEE trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ISEE's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while CRSP trades at $59.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -13.14. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check CRSP's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while AXSM trades at $100.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check AXSM's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MRUS trades at $65.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MRUS's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while TLX trades at $13.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is 134.90. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to TLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check TLX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while PCVX trades at $34.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check PCVX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ZLAB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ZLAB trades at $40.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLAB's P/E ratio is -15.58. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ZLAB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ZLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ZLAB's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ALPN trades at $64.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ALPN's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ALKS trades at $27.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ALKS's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ABVX trades at $69.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ABVX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, SLNO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while SLNO trades at $83.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNO's P/E ratio is -17.72. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to SLNO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to SLNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check SLNO's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while KRYS trades at $152.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 36.38. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check KRYS's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ADMA trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ADMA's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RNA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RNA trades at $35.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNA's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RNA's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while CYTK trades at $35.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +8.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check CYTK's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while OPT trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to OPT's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check OPT's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MRTX trades at $58.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MRTX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while PTCT trades at $49.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check PTCT's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MTSR trades at $37.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MTSR's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ACLX trades at $69.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -23.65. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ACLX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ACAD trades at $22.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ACAD's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while AKRO trades at $47.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check AKRO's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while LEGN trades at $40.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -34.55. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check LEGN's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RYZB trades at $62.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RYZB's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while CBAY trades at $32.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check CBAY's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, AAPG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while AAPG trades at $40.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPG's P/E ratio is -53.29. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to AAPG's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to AAPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check AAPG's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while VKTX trades at $32.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -21.37. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check VKTX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while SWTX trades at $46.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check SWTX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while SRRK trades at $37.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check SRRK's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while PTGX trades at $55.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is 70.53. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to PTGX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check PTGX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MLTX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MLTX trades at $52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLTX's P/E ratio is -22.76. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MLTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MLTX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while KYMR trades at $43.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check KYMR's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MORF trades at $56.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MORF's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MOR trades at $18.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MOR's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MOR's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while IMVT trades at $16.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check IMVT's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while CRNX trades at $29.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check CRNX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, KDNY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while KDNY trades at $40.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDNY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to KDNY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to KDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check KDNY's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MYOV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MYOV trades at $26.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYOV's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MYOV's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MYOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MYOV's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RARE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RARE trades at $27.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RARE's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RARE's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RARE's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while CPRX trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check CPRX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while NAMS trades at $22.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -12.38. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check NAMS's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while LGND trades at $131.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to LGND's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check LGND's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while MIRM trades at $51.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -31.78. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check MIRM's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, RXRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while RXRX trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXRX's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to RXRX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to RXRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check RXRX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while NAMSW trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check NAMSW's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while APLS trades at $18.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to APLS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check APLS's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, PRVB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while PRVB trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRVB's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to PRVB's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to PRVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check PRVB's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while XENE trades at $30.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check XENE's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, LBPH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while LBPH trades at $59.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBPH's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to LBPH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to LBPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check LBPH's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, DICE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while DICE trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DICE's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to DICE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to DICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check DICE's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while APGE trades at $37.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -10.51. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check APGE's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while IBRX trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check IBRX's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while KNSA trades at $30.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is -126.54. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to KNSA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check KNSA's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while ARWR trades at $15.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check ARWR's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, AGIO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while AGIO trades at $37.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGIO's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to AGIO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to AGIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check AGIO's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, IDYA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while IDYA trades at $24.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDYA's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to IDYA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to IDYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check IDYA's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, GLPG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while GLPG trades at $32.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLPG's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to GLPG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to GLPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check GLPG's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, CALT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while CALT trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALT's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to CALT's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to CALT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check CALT's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, IRON has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while IRON trades at $59.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRON's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to IRON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to IRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check IRON's competition here

EFTR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFTR stands at 2.8K. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFTR is priced at $0.00, while BLTE trades at $63.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFTR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -46.76. In terms of profitability, EFTR's ROE is +7.23%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EFTR is more volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFTR.Check BLTE's competition here